266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18810391)
1. The immediate effect of navigation on implant accuracy in primary mini-invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
Rosenberger RE; Fink C; Quirbach S; Attal R; Tecklenburg K; Hoser C
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2008 Dec; 16(12):1133-40. PubMed ID: 18810391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improved accuracy of component alignment with the implementation of image-free navigation in total knee arthroplasty.
Rosenberger RE; Hoser C; Quirbach S; Attal R; Hennerbichler A; Fink C
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2008 Mar; 16(3):249-57. PubMed ID: 18157493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of implantation during computer-assisted minimally invasive Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a comparison with a conventional instrumented technique.
Jung KA; Kim SJ; Lee SC; Hwang SH; Ahn NK
Knee; 2010 Dec; 17(6):387-91. PubMed ID: 19945880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improved implant alignment accuracy with an accelerometer-based portable navigation system in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
Suda Y; Takayama K; Ishida K; Hayashi S; Hashimoto S; Niikura T; Matsushita T; Kuroda R; Matsumoto T
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2020 Sep; 28(9):2917-2923. PubMed ID: 31451844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computer-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using dedicated software versus a conventional technique.
Manzotti A; Cerveri P; Pullen C; Confalonieri N
Int Orthop; 2014 Feb; 38(2):457-63. PubMed ID: 24305791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Unicompartmental knee prosthesis implantation with a non-image-based navigation system: rationale, technique, case-control comparative study with a conventional instrumented implantation.
Jenny JY; Boeri C
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2003 Jan; 11(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 12548450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Determination of the Accuracy of Navigated Kinematic Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A 2-Year Follow-Up.
Grant AL; Doma KD; Hazratwala K
J Arthroplasty; 2017 May; 32(5):1443-1452. PubMed ID: 28039023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Navigated Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Different Perspective.
Malhotra R; Gupta S; Gupta V; Manhas V
Clin Orthop Surg; 2021 Dec; 13(4):491-498. PubMed ID: 34868498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inaccurate rotational component position in image-free navigated unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
Toda A; Ishida K; Matsumoto T; Sasaki H; Takayama K; Kuroda R; Kurosaka M; Shibanuma N
Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol; 2016 Jan; 3():19-24. PubMed ID: 29264256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Superior alignment but no difference in clinical outcome after minimally invasive computer-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (MICA-UKA).
Zhang Z; Zhu W; Zhu L; Du Y
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Nov; 24(11):3419-3424. PubMed ID: 25423875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Superior femoral component alignment can be achieved with Oxford microplasty instrumentation after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
Tu Y; Xue H; Ma T; Wen T; Yang T; Zhang H; Cai M
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2017 Mar; 25(3):729-735. PubMed ID: 27225890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of robot-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a controlled cadaver study using multiparameter quantitative three-dimensional CT assessment of alignment.
Moon YW; Ha CW; Do KH; Kim CY; Han JH; Na SE; Lee CH; Kim JG; Park YS
Comput Aided Surg; 2012; 17(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 22348661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Implant and limb alignment outcomes for conventional and navigated unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
Valenzuela GA; Jacobson NA; Geist DJ; Valenzuela RG; Teitge RA
J Arthroplasty; 2013 Mar; 28(3):463-8. PubMed ID: 23142438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of implant alignment in navigated unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a comparison of 2D and 3D imaging.
Ishida K; Toda A; Shibanuma N; Matsumoto T; Kuroda R; Kurosaka M
Acta Orthop Belg; 2015 Dec; 81(4):654-61. PubMed ID: 26790787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mechanical accuracy of navigated minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty (MIS TKA).
Biasca N; Wirth S; Bungartz M
Knee; 2009 Jan; 16(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 19070495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Precision of Ci-navigated extension and flexion gap balancing in total knee arthroplasty and analysis of potential predictive variables.
Fickert S; Jawhar A; Sunil P; Scharf HP
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2012 Apr; 132(4):565-74. PubMed ID: 22072193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: Does the tibial component remain at malposition risk?
Bové JC
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2010 Sep; 96(5):536-42. PubMed ID: 20605549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Femur positioning in navigated total knee arthroplasty.
Pfitzner T; Röhner E; Preininger B; Perka C; Matziolis G
Orthopedics; 2012 Oct; 35(10 Suppl):45-9. PubMed ID: 23026252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does new instrumentation improve radiologic alignment of the Oxford® medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty?
Jang KM; Lim HC; Han SB; Jeong C; Kim SG; Bae JH
Knee; 2017 Jun; 24(3):641-650. PubMed ID: 28330757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Current state of computer navigation and robotics in unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
van der List JP; Chawla H; Joskowicz L; Pearle AD
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Nov; 24(11):3482-3495. PubMed ID: 27600634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
