These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18811108)

  • 1. Transmission electron microscopy study of corneal epithelial flaps following removal using mechanical scraping, alcohol, and epikeratome techniques.
    Choi CY; Kim JY; Kim MJ; Tchah H
    J Refract Surg; 2008 Sep; 24(7):667-70. PubMed ID: 18811108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Different epithelial cleavage planes produced by various epikeratomes in epithelial laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Choi SK; Kim JH; Lee D; Lee JB; Kim HM; Tchah HW; Hahn TW; Joo M; Ha CI
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Dec; 34(12):2079-84. PubMed ID: 19027563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Confocal and electron microscopic studies of laser subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) in the white leghorn chick eye.
    Lee JB; Javier JA; Chang JH; Chen CC; Kato T; Azar DT
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2002 Dec; 120(12):1700-6. PubMed ID: 12470145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of repositioning or discarding the epithelial flap in laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy and epithelial laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Taneri S; Oehler S; Koch J; Azar D
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Oct; 37(10):1832-46. PubMed ID: 21930046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Alcohol debridement of the corneal epithelium in PRK and LASEK: an electron microscopic study.
    Browning AC; Shah S; Dua HS; Maharajan SV; Gray T; Bragheeth MA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Feb; 44(2):510-3. PubMed ID: 12556376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Morphologic changes of corneal epithelial flap: ethanol-mediated versus mechanical removal.
    Katbab A; Owji SM; Eghtedari M
    Ultrastruct Pathol; 2012 Dec; 36(6):400-3. PubMed ID: 23216237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Epi-LASIK versus epi-LASEK.
    Camellin M; Wyler D
    J Refract Surg; 2008 Jan; 24(1):S57-63. PubMed ID: 18269152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The structure and viability analysis of corneal epithelial flap in the rabbit cornea after Epi-LASIK].
    Liu WF; DU ZY; Zhao WX; Huang Z; Liu DJ; Chen Y
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Jul; 43(7):651-7. PubMed ID: 17897558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long term results of Epi-LASIK and LASEK for myopia.
    Yuksel N; Bilgihan K; Hondur AM; Yildiz B; Yuksel E
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2014 Jun; 37(3):132-5. PubMed ID: 24128385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Epi-LASIK: comparative histological evaluation of mechanical and alcohol-assisted epithelial separation.
    Pallikaris IG; Naoumidi II; Kalyvianaki MI; Katsanevaki VJ
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2003 Aug; 29(8):1496-501. PubMed ID: 12954295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Live or Let Die: Epithelial Flap Vitality and Keratocyte Proliferation Following LASEK and Epi-LASIK in Human Donor and Porcine Eyes.
    Angunawela RI; Winkler von Mohrenfels C; Kumar A; O'Brart DP; Marshall J
    J Refract Surg; 2011 Feb; 27(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 20415285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Basement membrane and collagen deposition after laser subepithelial keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy in the leghorn chick eye.
    Javier JA; Lee JB; Oliveira HB; Chang JH; Azar DT
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2006 May; 124(5):703-9. PubMed ID: 16682593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term visual and refractive outcomes following surface ablation techniques in a large population for myopia correction.
    Kulkarni SV; AlMahmoud T; Priest D; Taylor SE; Mintsioulis G; Jackson WB
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jan; 54(1):609-19. PubMed ID: 23221080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of visual results between laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy and epipolis laser in situ keratomileusis to correct myopia and myopic astigmatism.
    Teus MA; de Benito-Llopis L; García-González M
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Sep; 146(3):357-362. PubMed ID: 18614136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of epithelial integrity and cell viability in epithelial flaps prepared with the epi-LASIK procedure.
    Tanioka H; Hieda O; Kawasaki S; Nakai Y; Kinoshita S
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Jul; 33(7):1195-200. PubMed ID: 17586375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Stromal cells change after epipolis laser in situ keratomileusis and laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy in rabbits].
    Chen CD; Zhou XT; Dai JH; Chu RY; Hu M; Yu ZQ; Zhou H; Qu XM
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Sep; 42(9):796-801. PubMed ID: 17173740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Histological evaluation of mechanical epithelial separation in epithelial laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Soma T; Nishida K; Yamato M; Kosaka S; Yang J; Hayashi R; Sugiyama H; Maeda N; Okano T; Tano Y
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Jul; 35(7):1251-9. PubMed ID: 19545817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Corneal epithelial adhesion abnormalities associated with LASIK.
    Kenyon KR; Paz H; Greiner JV; Gipson IK
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Jan; 111(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 14711707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cleavage of corneal basement membrane components by ethanol exposure in laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy.
    Espana EM; Grueterich M; Mateo A; Romano AC; Yee SB; Yee RW; Tseng SC
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2003 Jun; 29(6):1192-7. PubMed ID: 12842689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laser in situ keratomileusis versus surface ablation: visual outcomes and complications.
    Ghadhfan F; Al-Rajhi A; Wagoner MD
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Dec; 33(12):2041-8. PubMed ID: 18053901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.