34 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18811766)
1. The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists (RANZCR), 73rd Annual Scientific Meeting, 19-21 October 2023.
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2023 Oct; 67 Suppl 1():4-183. PubMed ID: 37822040
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Restructuring Our Approach to Peer Review: A Critical Need to Improve the Quality and Safety of Radiation Therapy.
Chera BS; Potters L; Marks LB
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2020; 10(5):321-323. PubMed ID: 32888525
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Gradual Acquisition of Professional Knowledge, Audit Quality and Audit Fees.
Xu G; Ding R; Cheng H; Xing Q
Front Psychol; 2022; 13():759875. PubMed ID: 35369164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Regional cancer centre demonstrates voluntary conformity with the national Radiation Oncology Practice Standards.
Manley S; Last A; Fu K; Greenham S; Kovendy A; Shakespeare TP
J Med Radiat Sci; 2015 Jun; 62(2):152-9. PubMed ID: 26229680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A survey of radiation treatment planning peer-review activities in a provincial radiation oncology programme: current practice and future directions.
Brundage M; Foxcroft S; McGowan T; Gutierrez E; Sharpe M; Warde P
BMJ Open; 2013 Jul; 3(7):. PubMed ID: 23903814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ten-year results of quality assurance in radiotherapy chart round.
Taghavi Bayat B; Gill S; Siva S; Tai KH; Joon ML; Foroudi F
BMC Health Serv Res; 2013 Apr; 13():148. PubMed ID: 23617328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiation oncology peer review in Australia and New Zealand.
Chin S; Or M; Ong WL; Millar J; Chilkuri M; Vinod S
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2022 Mar; 66(2):258-266. PubMed ID: 35243786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of a real-time peer review audit on patient management in a radiation oncology department.
Boxer M; Forstner D; Kneebone A; Delaney G; Koh ES; Fuller M; Kaadan N
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Aug; 53(4):405-11. PubMed ID: 19695048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of RANZCR and Singapore-designed radiation oncology practice audit instruments: how does reproducibility affect future approaches to revalidation?
Shakespeare TP; Mukherjee RK; Lu JJ; Wynne CJ; Kumar MB; Back MF
Australas Radiol; 2004 Jun; 48(2):195-203. PubMed ID: 15230754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is rural radiation oncology practice quality as good as the big smoke? Results of the Australian radiotherapy single machine unit trial.
Shakespeare TP; Turner M; Chapman A
Australas Radiol; 2007 Aug; 51(4):381-5. PubMed ID: 17635479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. IRQN Award article: Radiology audit: a program developed for remote or solo-practicing radiologists: a New Zealand quality initiative.
Baigent ML; Harding R
J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Nov; 4(11):841-3. PubMed ID: 17964507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Projected requirements for radiation oncologists and trainees in Australia and New Zealand to 2007.
Morgan G; Wigg D; Childs J
Australas Radiol; 2000 Feb; 44(1):88-97. PubMed ID: 10761265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. RANZCR 2006 peer review audit instrument.
Toohey J; Shakespeare TP; Morgan G
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2008 Aug; 52(4):403-13. PubMed ID: 18811766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
