BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1881253)

  • 1. Spinal MR imaging in suspected metastases: correlation with skeletal scintigraphy.
    Colletti PM; Dang HT; Deseran MW; Kerr RM; Boswell WD; Ralls PW
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1991; 9(3):349-55. PubMed ID: 1881253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does magnetic resonance imaging give value-added than bone scintigraphy in the detection of vertebral metastasis?
    Chiewvit P; Danchaivijitr N; Sirivitmaitrie K; Chiewvit S; Thephamongkhol K
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Jun; 92(6):818-29. PubMed ID: 19530588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spinal cord compression due to metastatic disease: diagnosis with MR imaging versus myelography.
    Carmody RF; Yang PJ; Seeley GW; Seeger JF; Unger EC; Johnson JE
    Radiology; 1989 Oct; 173(1):225-9. PubMed ID: 2675185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of MR imaging in evaluating metastatic spinal disease.
    Smoker WR; Godersky JC; Knutzon RK; Keyes WD; Norman D; Bergman W
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Dec; 149(6):1241-8. PubMed ID: 3500616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Magnetic resonance imaging in suspected metastatic spinal cord compression.
    Williams MP; Cherryman GR; Husband JE
    Clin Radiol; 1989 May; 40(3):286-90. PubMed ID: 2752687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors influencing visualization of vertebral metastases on MR imaging versus bone scintigraphy.
    Taoka T; Mayr NA; Lee HJ; Yuh WT; Simonson TM; Rezai K; Berbaum KS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Jun; 176(6):1525-30. PubMed ID: 11373226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Frequency of unexpected multifocal metastasis in patients with acute spinal cord compression. Evaluation by low-field MR imaging in cancer patients.
    Heldmann U; Myschetzky PS; Thomsen HS
    Acta Radiol; 1997 May; 38(3):372-5. PubMed ID: 9191426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Magnetic resonance imaging of metastatic bone disease.
    Traill Z; Richards MA; Moore NR
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 Mar; (312):76-88. PubMed ID: 7634620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Which MR imaging sequences are necessary in determining the need for radiation therapy for cord compression? A prospective study.
    Johnson AJ; Ying J; El Gammal T; Timmerman RD; Kim RY; Littenberg B
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2007 Jan; 28(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 17213420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of bone marrow: differentiation of benign versus pathologic compression fractures.
    Baur A; Stäbler A; Brüning R; Bartl R; Krödel A; Reiser M; Deimling M
    Radiology; 1998 May; 207(2):349-56. PubMed ID: 9577479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does T1- and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging give value-added than bone scintigraphy in the follow-up of vertebral metastasis of prostate cancer?
    Lee DH; Nam JK; Jung HS; Kim SJ; Chung MK; Park SW
    Investig Clin Urol; 2017 Sep; 58(5):324-330. PubMed ID: 28868503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detection of vertebral metastases: comparison between MR imaging and bone scintigraphy.
    Algra PR; Bloem JL; Tissing H; Falke TH; Arndt JW; Verboom LJ
    Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):219-32. PubMed ID: 2028061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical and experimental imaging of breast cancer metastases in the spine.
    Petrén-Mallmin M
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1994; 391():1-23. PubMed ID: 8172006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of prostate cancer metastatic to bone.
    Fujii Y; Higashi Y; Owada F; Okuno T; Mizuno H; Mizuno H
    Br J Urol; 1995 Jan; 75(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 7850297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Metastatic disease of the spine.
    White AP; Kwon BK; Lindskog DM; Friedlaender GE; Grauer JN
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2006 Oct; 14(11):587-98. PubMed ID: 17030592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intertrabecular vertebral metastases: metastases only detectable on MR imaging.
    Yamaguchi T
    Semin Musculoskelet Radiol; 2001 Jun; 5(2):171-5. PubMed ID: 11500162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Imaging of the spine in patients with malignancy.
    MacVicar D
    Cancer Imaging; 2006 Oct; 6(Spec No A):S22-6. PubMed ID: 17114075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact on treatment planning of MRI of the spine in patients suspected of vertebral metastasis: an efficacy study.
    Colletti PM; Siegel HJ; Woo MY; Young HY; Terk MR
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 1996; 20(3):159-62. PubMed ID: 8930468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Magnetic resonance in examination of the spine in patients with multiple myeloma].
    Vytrasová M; Scudla V; Nekula J; Bucil J; Vavrdová V; Bacovský J
    Vnitr Lek; 2001 Oct; 47(10):694-8. PubMed ID: 11789008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Early diagnosis of spinal metastases by CT and MR studies.
    Colman LK; Porter BA; Redmond J; Olson DO; Stimac GK; Dunning DM; Friedl KE
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1988; 12(3):423-6. PubMed ID: 3366955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.