These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18813345)

  • 1. Modulating attentional load affects numerosity estimation: evidence against a pre-attentive subitizing mechanism.
    Vetter P; Butterworth B; Bahrami B
    PLoS One; 2008 Sep; 3(9):e3269. PubMed ID: 18813345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What eye fixation patterns tell us about subitizing.
    Sophian C; Crosby ME
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2008; 33(3):394-409. PubMed ID: 18473205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intentional subitizing: exploring the role of automaticity in enumeration.
    Pincham HL; Szűcs D
    Cognition; 2012 Aug; 124(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 22695378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enumeration of small and large numerosities: the effect of element visibility.
    Palomares M; Smith PR; Pitts CH
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(6):1185-94. PubMed ID: 22489791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Subitizing but not estimation of numerosity requires attentional resources.
    Burr DC; Turi M; Anobile G
    J Vis; 2010 Jun; 10(6):20. PubMed ID: 20884569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does subitizing reflect numerical estimation?
    Revkin SK; Piazza M; Izard V; Cohen L; Dehaene S
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Jun; 19(6):607-14. PubMed ID: 18578852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A candidate for the attentional bottleneck: set-size specific modulation of the right TPJ during attentive enumeration.
    Vetter P; Butterworth B; Bahrami B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Mar; 23(3):728-36. PubMed ID: 20350059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of cross-sensory attentional demand on subitizing and on mapping number onto space.
    Anobile G; Turi M; Cicchini GM; Burr DC
    Vision Res; 2012 Dec; 74():102-9. PubMed ID: 22727938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of attention in subitizing.
    Railo H; Koivisto M; Revonsuo A; Hannula MM
    Cognition; 2008 Apr; 107(1):82-104. PubMed ID: 17923120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Linking visual attention and number processing in the brain: the role of the temporo-parietal junction in small and large symbolic and nonsymbolic number comparison.
    Ansari D; Lyons IM; van Eimeren L; Xu F
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Nov; 19(11):1845-53. PubMed ID: 17958487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatial working memory load affects counting but not subitizing in enumeration.
    Shimomura T; Kumada T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Aug; 73(6):1694-709. PubMed ID: 21671157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can subitizing survive the attentional blink? An ERP study.
    Xu X; Liu C
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Aug; 440(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 18556118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Enumerating by pointing to locations: a new method for measuring the numerosity of visual object representations.
    Haladjian HH; Pylyshyn ZW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Feb; 73(2):303-8. PubMed ID: 21264734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Higher attentional costs for numerosity estimation at high densities.
    Pomè A; Anobile G; Cicchini GM; Scabia A; Burr DC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Nov; 81(8):2604-2611. PubMed ID: 31407272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How do people apprehend large numerosities?
    Sophian C; Chu Y
    Cognition; 2008 May; 107(2):460-78. PubMed ID: 18082157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Range dependent processing of visual numerosity: similarities across vision and haptics.
    Plaisier MA; Bergmann Tiest WM; Kappers AM
    Exp Brain Res; 2010 Aug; 204(4):525-37. PubMed ID: 20549196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Underestimation of perceived number at the time of saccades.
    Binda P; Morrone MC; Ross J; Burr DC
    Vision Res; 2011 Jan; 51(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 20934445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adaptation affects both high and low (subitized) numbers under conditions of high attentional load.
    Burr DC; Anobile G; Turi M
    Seeing Perceiving; 2011; 24(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 21864455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Manipulation of attention affects subitizing performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Chen J; Paul JM; Reeve R
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2022 Aug; 139():104753. PubMed ID: 35772633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision.
    Trick LM; Pylyshyn ZW
    Psychol Rev; 1994 Jan; 101(1):80-102. PubMed ID: 8121961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.