These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18813892)

  • 1. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: risk factors for failure over 25 years.
    Yue EJ; Cabanela ME; Duffy GP; Heckman MG; O'Connor MI
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2009 Apr; 467(4):992-9. PubMed ID: 18813892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Independent predictors of revision following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a retrospective cohort study using National Joint Registry data.
    Jameson SS; Baker PN; Mason J; Porter ML; Deehan DJ; Reed MR
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Jun; 94(6):746-54. PubMed ID: 22628587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term survival and reason for revision of Wagner resurfacing hip arthroplasty.
    Costi K; Howie DW; Campbell DG; McGee MA; Cornish BL
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Jun; 25(4):522-8. PubMed ID: 19520546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term outcome of a metal-on-polyethylene cementless hip resurfacing.
    Tan TL; Ebramzadeh E; Campbell PA; Al-Hamad M; Amstutz HC
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Apr; 29(4):802-7. PubMed ID: 24090660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Uncemented total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in young patients: a mid-to long-term follow-up study from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.
    Eskelinen A; Remes V; Helenius I; Pulkkinen P; Nevalainen J; Paavolainen P
    Acta Orthop; 2006 Feb; 77(1):57-70. PubMed ID: 16534703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Metal-on-metal surface replacement: a triumph of hope over reason: affirms.
    Cuckler JM
    Orthopedics; 2011 Sep; 34(9):e439-41. PubMed ID: 21902124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Resurfacing matched to standard total hip arthroplasty by preoperative activity levels - a comparison of postoperative outcomes.
    Zywiel MG; Marker DR; McGrath MS; Delanois RE; Mont MA
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):116-9. PubMed ID: 19583537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Hip resurfacing in patients under 55 years of age].
    Schmitz MW; Veth RP; Schreurs BW
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2011; 155(38):A3186. PubMed ID: 21939567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sex as a patient selection criterion for metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Amstutz HC; Wisk LE; Le Duff MJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Feb; 26(2):198-208. PubMed ID: 20452178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conus hip prosthesis.
    Wagner H; Wagner M
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(4):213-21. PubMed ID: 11706545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The design of the acetabular component and size of the femoral head influence the risk of revision following 34 721 single-brand cemented hip replacements: a retrospective cohort study of medium-term data from a National Joint Registry.
    Jameson SS; Baker PN; Mason J; Gregg PJ; Brewster N; Deehan DJ; Reed MR
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Dec; 94(12):1611-7. PubMed ID: 23188900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Resurfacing is comparable to total hip arthroplasty at short-term follow-up.
    Mont MA; Marker DR; Smith JM; Ulrich SD; McGrath MS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2009 Jan; 467(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 18841436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in patients 40 years old and younger.
    Reito A; Eskelinen A; Puolakka T; Pajamäki J
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2013 Feb; 133(2):267-73. PubMed ID: 23135156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three metal-on-metal hip replacement devices from the same manufacturer--a short- to mid-term survival.
    Kostensalo I; Junnila M; Mokka J; Virolainen P; Vahlberg T; Mäkelä KT
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2014 Jun; 80(2):222-7. PubMed ID: 25090796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is patient selection important for hip resurfacing?
    Nunley RM; Della Valle CJ; Barrack RL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2009 Jan; 467(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 18941859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: mid-term results in 486 cases and current indication in our institution.
    Ribas M; Cardenas C; Astarita E; Moya E; Bellotti V
    Hip Int; 2014 Oct; 24 Suppl 10():S19-24. PubMed ID: 24970031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Initial American experience with hip resurfacing following FDA approval.
    Della Valle CJ; Nunley RM; Raterman SJ; Barrack RL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2009 Jan; 467(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 18949528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Survival of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature.
    van der Weegen W; Hoekstra HJ; Sijbesma T; Bos E; Schemitsch EH; Poolman RW
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Mar; 93(3):298-306. PubMed ID: 21357949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Birmingham Hip Resurfacing in Patients 55 Years or Younger: Risk Factors for Poor Midterm Outcomes.
    Halawi MJ; Brigati D; Messner W; Brooks PJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jun; 32(6):1880-1883. PubMed ID: 28108170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Have contemporary hip resurfacing designs reached maturity? A review.
    Ong KL; Manley MT; Kurtz SM
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Aug; 90 Suppl 3():81-8. PubMed ID: 18676941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.