These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18814307)

  • 1. Power comparisons between similarity-based multilocus association methods, logistic regression, and score tests for haplotypes.
    Lin WY; Schaid DJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2009 Apr; 33(3):183-97. PubMed ID: 18814307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Incorporating single-locus tests into haplotype cladistic analysis in case-control studies.
    Liu J; Papasian C; Deng HW
    PLoS Genet; 2007 Mar; 3(3):e46. PubMed ID: 17381242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detailed analysis of the relative power of direct and indirect association studies and the implications for their interpretation.
    Moskvina V; O'Donovan MC
    Hum Hered; 2007; 64(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 17483598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantifying the amount of missing information in genetic association studies.
    Nicolae DL
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 30(8):703-17. PubMed ID: 16986163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fine mapping of disease genes via haplotype clustering.
    Waldron ER; Whittaker JC; Balding DJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Feb; 30(2):170-9. PubMed ID: 16385468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Haplotypes vs single marker linkage disequilibrium tests: what do we gain?
    Akey J; Jin L; Xiong M
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2001 Apr; 9(4):291-300. PubMed ID: 11313774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of missing and erroneous genotypes on tagging SNP selection and power of subsequent association tests.
    Liu W; Zhao W; Chase GA
    Hum Hered; 2006; 61(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 16557026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new association test using haplotype similarity.
    Sha Q; Chen HS; Zhang S
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 31(6):577-93. PubMed ID: 17443704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accounting for haplotype uncertainty in matched association studies: a comparison of simple and flexible techniques.
    Kraft P; Cox DG; Paynter RA; Hunter D; De Vivo I
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005 Apr; 28(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 15637718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using tree-based recursive partitioning methods to group haplotypes for increased power in association studies.
    Yu K; Xu J; Rao DC; Province M
    Ann Hum Genet; 2005 Sep; 69(Pt 5):577-89. PubMed ID: 16138916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A regression-based association test for case-control studies that uses inferred ancestral haplotype similarity.
    Liu Y; Li YJ; Satten GA; Allen AS; Tzeng JY
    Ann Hum Genet; 2009 Sep; 73(Pt 5):520-6. PubMed ID: 19622101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genomic breeding value estimation using genetic markers, inferred ancestral haplotypes, and the genomic relationship matrix.
    de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Druet T
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Sep; 94(9):4708-14. PubMed ID: 21854945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does haplotype diversity predict power for association mapping of disease susceptibility?
    Zhang W; Collins A; Morton NE
    Hum Genet; 2004 Jul; 115(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 15221450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Association tests using kernel-based measures of multi-locus genotype similarity between individuals.
    Mukhopadhyay I; Feingold E; Weeks DE; Thalamuthu A
    Genet Epidemiol; 2010 Apr; 34(3):213-21. PubMed ID: 19697357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Direct analysis of unphased SNP genotype data in population-based association studies via Bayesian partition modelling of haplotypes.
    Morris AP
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 29(2):91-107. PubMed ID: 15940704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The relative power of SNPs and haplotype as genetic markers for association tests.
    Bader JS
    Pharmacogenomics; 2001 Feb; 2(1):11-24. PubMed ID: 11258193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantifying bias due to allele misclassification in case-control studies of haplotypes.
    Govindarajulu US; Spiegelman D; Miller KL; Kraft P
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Nov; 30(7):590-601. PubMed ID: 16830341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Haplotypes and haplotype-tagging single-nucleotide polymorphism: presentation Group 8 of Genetic Analysis Workshop 14.
    Beckmann L; Ziegler A; Duggal P; Bailey-Wilson JE
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005; 29 Suppl 1():S59-71. PubMed ID: 16342175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fine mapping by linkage and association in nuclear family and case-control designs.
    Bull SB; John S; Briollais L
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005; 29 Suppl 1():S48-58. PubMed ID: 16342184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A flexible Bayesian framework for modeling haplotype association with disease, allowing for dominance effects of the underlying causative variants.
    Morris AP
    Am J Hum Genet; 2006 Oct; 79(4):679-94. PubMed ID: 16960804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.