586 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18815053)
1. Accuracy and repeatability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements used in the determination of facial indices in the laboratory setup.
Moerenhout BA; Gelaude F; Swennen GR; Casselman JW; Van Der Sloten J; Mommaerts MY
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 18815053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability of traditional cephalometric landmarks as seen in three-dimensional analysis in maxillary expansion treatments.
Lagravère MO; Gordon JM; Guedes IH; Flores-Mir C; Carey JP; Heo G; Major PW
Angle Orthod; 2009 Nov; 79(6):1047-56. PubMed ID: 19852593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The accuracy of matching three-dimensional photographs with skin surfaces derived from cone-beam computed tomography.
Maal TJ; Plooij JM; Rangel FA; Mollemans W; Schutyser FA; Bergé SJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jul; 37(7):641-6. PubMed ID: 18539435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography dental measurements.
Baumgaertel S; Palomo JM; Palomo L; Hans MG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):19-25; discussion 25-8. PubMed ID: 19577143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intraexaminer and interexaminer reliabilities of landmark identification on digitized lateral cephalograms and formatted 3-dimensional cone-beam computerized tomography images.
Lagravère MO; Low C; Flores-Mir C; Chung R; Carey JP; Heo G; Major PW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 20451778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability and the smallest detectable difference of measurements on 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography images.
Damstra J; Fourie Z; Huddleston Slater JJ; Ren Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Sep; 140(3):e107-14. PubMed ID: 21889058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A cone-beam computed tomography triple scan procedure to obtain a three-dimensional augmented virtual skull model appropriate for orthognathic surgery planning.
Swennen GR; Mollemans W; De Clercq C; Abeloos J; Lamoral P; Lippens F; Neyt N; Casselman J; Schutyser F
J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 20(2):297-307. PubMed ID: 19276829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Orthodontic soft-tissue parameters: a comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and the 3dMD imaging system.
Metzger TE; Kula KS; Eckert GJ; Ghoneima AA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):672-81. PubMed ID: 24182583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of the reliability and repeatability of landmarks using 3-D cephalometric software.
Frongia G; Piancino MG; Bracco AA; Crincoli V; Debernardi CL; Bracco P
Cranio; 2012 Oct; 30(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23156966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The reliability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) - generated frontal cephalograms.
Kim SJ; Park SB; Kim YI; Cho BH; Hwang DS
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):e331-6. PubMed ID: 22444351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of soft-tissue profiles in Le Fort I osteotomy patients with Dolphin and Maxilim softwares.
Nadjmi N; Tehranchi A; Azami N; Saedi B; Mollemans W
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):654-62. PubMed ID: 24182581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Facial soft tissue esthetic predictions: validation in craniomaxillofacial surgery with cone beam computed tomography data.
Bianchi A; Muyldermans L; Di Martino M; Lancellotti L; Amadori S; Sarti A; Marchetti C
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 68(7):1471-9. PubMed ID: 20561464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Registration of 3-dimensional facial photographs for clinical use.
Maal TJ; van Loon B; Plooij JM; Rangel F; Ettema AM; Borstlap WA; Bergé SJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Oct; 68(10):2391-401. PubMed ID: 20708318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of reconstructed images from cone-beam computed tomography scans.
Lamichane M; Anderson NK; Rigali PH; Seldin EB; Will LA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):156.e1-6; discussion 156-7. PubMed ID: 19651340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy and reliability of linear cephalometric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography scans of a dry human skull.
Berco M; Rigali PH; Miner RM; DeLuca S; Anderson NK; Will LA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):17.e1-9; discussion 17-8. PubMed ID: 19577142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.
Periago DR; Scarfe WC; Moshiri M; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison between conventional and cone-beam computed tomography-generated cephalograms.
Cattaneo PM; Bloch CB; Calmar D; Hjortshøj M; Melsen B
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):798-802. PubMed ID: 19061807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison between 2D and 3D cephalometry on CBCT scans of human skulls.
van Vlijmen OJ; Maal T; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Feb; 39(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 20044238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Distances between facial landmarks can be measured accurately with a new digital 3-dimensional video system.
Schimmel M; Christou P; Houstis O; Herrmann FR; Kiliaridis S; Müller F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):580.e1-580.e10; discussion 580-1. PubMed ID: 20451768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional cephalometry on frontal radiographs and on cone beam computed tomography scans of human skulls.
van Vlijmen OJ; Maal TJ; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 19583759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
