These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

369 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18815092)

  • 1. Electrical impedance tomography problem with inaccurately known boundary and contact impedances.
    Kolehmainen V; Lassas M; Ola P
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 Oct; 27(10):1404-14. PubMed ID: 18815092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Imaging of conductivity changes and electrode movement in EIT.
    Soleimani M; Gómez-Laberge C; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S103-13. PubMed ID: 16636402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Induced current magnetic resonance-electrical impedance tomography.
    Ozparlak L; Ider YZ
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S289-305. PubMed ID: 15798242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrical impedance tomography for piecewise constant domains using boundary element shape-based inverse solutions.
    Babaeizadeh S; Brooks DH
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 May; 26(5):637-47. PubMed ID: 17518058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Solution of the inverse problem of magnetic induction tomography (MIT).
    Merwa R; Hollaus K; Brunner P; Scharfetter H
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S241-50. PubMed ID: 15798237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Direct reconstruction of tissue parameters from differential multifrequency EIT in vivo.
    Mayer M; Brunner P; Merwa R; Smolle-Jüttner FM; Maier A; Scharfetter H
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S93-101. PubMed ID: 16636423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving the forward solver for the complete electrode model in EIT using algebraic multigrid.
    Soleimani M; Powell CE; Polydorides N
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 May; 24(5):577-83. PubMed ID: 15889545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reconstruction of the shape of conductivity spectra using differential multi-frequency magnetic induction tomography.
    Brunner P; Merwa R; Missner A; Rosell J; Hollaus K; Scharfetter H
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S237-48. PubMed ID: 16636414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Objective selection of hyperparameter for EIT.
    Graham BM; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S65-79. PubMed ID: 16636421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors limiting the application of electrical impedance tomography for identification of regional conductivity changes using scalp electrodes during epileptic seizures in humans.
    Fabrizi L; Sparkes M; Horesh L; Perez-Juste Abascal JF; McEwan A; Bayford RH; Elwes R; Binnie CD; Holder DS
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S163-74. PubMed ID: 16636408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dynamic electrical impedance imaging with the interacting multiple model scheme.
    Kim KY; Kim BS; Kim MC; Kim S; Isaacson D; Newell JC
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S217-33. PubMed ID: 15798235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Phase artefact reduction in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT).
    Lee BI; Park C; Pyo HC; Kwon O; Woo EJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(20):5277-88. PubMed ID: 17019038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. EIT reconstructions and Faddeev solutions for a numerically simulated phantom chest.
    Mueller JL
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2004; 40():213-8. PubMed ID: 15133960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accounting for hardware imperfections in EIT image reconstruction algorithms.
    Hartinger AE; Gagnon H; Guardo R
    Physiol Meas; 2007 Jul; 28(7):S13-27. PubMed ID: 17664631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficient Simultaneous Reconstruction of Time-Varying Images and Electrode Contact Impedances in Electrical Impedance Tomography.
    Boverman G; Isaacson D; Newell JC; Saulnier GJ; Kao TJ; Amm BC; Wang X; Davenport DM; Chong DH; Sahni R; Ashe JM
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Apr; 64(4):795-806. PubMed ID: 27295649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Shape deformation in two-dimensional electrical impedance tomography.
    Boyle A; Adler A; Lionheart WR
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 Dec; 31(12):2185-93. PubMed ID: 22711769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Error analysis of nonconstant admittivity for MR-based electric property imaging.
    Seo JK; Kim MO; Lee J; Choi N; Woo EJ; Kim HJ; Kwon OI; Kim DH
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 Feb; 31(2):430-7. PubMed ID: 21990329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using the GRID to improve the computation speed of electrical impedance tomography (EIT) reconstruction algorithms.
    Fritschy J; Horesh L; Holder DS; Bayford RH
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S209-15. PubMed ID: 15798234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of anisotropic modelling in electrical impedance tomography: description of method and preliminary assessment of utility in imaging brain function in the adult human head.
    Abascal JF; Arridge SR; Atkinson D; Horesh R; Fabrizi L; De Lucia M; Horesh L; Bayford RH; Holder DS
    Neuroimage; 2008 Nov; 43(2):258-68. PubMed ID: 18694835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of electrode area, contact impedance and boundary shape on EIT images.
    Boyle A; Adler A
    Physiol Meas; 2011 Jul; 32(7):745-54. PubMed ID: 21646710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.