These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18815315)
1. Critical appraisal of cost-effectiveness and cost-utility studies in health care. Soares M; Dumville JC Evid Based Nurs; 2008 Oct; 11(4):99-102. PubMed ID: 18815315 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing estimates of cost effectiveness submitted to the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) by different organisations: retrospective study. Miners AH; Garau M; Fidan D; Fischer AJ BMJ; 2005 Jan; 330(7482):65. PubMed ID: 15601681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality-adjusted life-years lack quality in pediatric care: a critical review of published cost-utility studies in child health. Griebsch I; Coast J; Brown J Pediatrics; 2005 May; 115(5):e600-14. PubMed ID: 15867026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Phase I: status report of existing data on the effectiveness, cost, and cost effectiveness of nutrition care services. Splett PL J Am Diet Assoc; 1991 Nov; Suppl():S9-14. PubMed ID: 1834722 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. How to critically appraise the clinical literature. Cronin P; Rawson JV; Heilbrun ME; Lee JM; Kelly AM; Sanelli PC; Bresnahan BW; Paladin AM Acad Radiol; 2014 Sep; 21(9):1117-28. PubMed ID: 25107864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Recommendations of the Second Panel on Cost Effectiveness in Health and Medicine: A Reference, Not a Rule Book. Carias C; Chesson HW; Grosse SD; Li R; Meltzer MI; Miller GF; Murphy LB; Nurmagambetov TA; Pike JJ; Whitham HK Am J Prev Med; 2018 Apr; 54(4):600-602. PubMed ID: 29338958 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Information on cost-effectiveness: an essential product of a national comparative effectiveness program. American College of Physicians Ann Intern Med; 2008 Jun; 148(12):956-61. PubMed ID: 18483128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Raising the quality of cost-utility analyses: lessons learnt and still to learn. Gerard K; Smoker I; Seymour J Health Policy; 1999 Mar; 46(3):217-38. PubMed ID: 10351669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Policy ... research that rings true. Hosp Health Netw; 1996 Oct; 70(19):13. PubMed ID: 8885294 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Costing and perspective in published cost-effectiveness analysis. Neumann PJ Med Care; 2009 Jul; 47(7 Suppl 1):S28-32. PubMed ID: 19536023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost data for individual patients included in clinical studies: no amount of statistical analysis can compensate for inadequate costing methods. Graves N; Walker D; Raine R; Hutchings A; Roberts JA Health Econ; 2002 Dec; 11(8):735-9. PubMed ID: 12457373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Strength in diversity. Med Device Technol; 1999 Mar; 10(2):80. PubMed ID: 10387616 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Health technology assessment: a policy-relevant technology diffusion model for emerging economies of the Asia and Pacific region. Roseman CB; Patrick WK; Tucker RV Asia Pac J Public Health; 1991; 5(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 1799526 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of technology on health care costs. Cotterill PG Profile Med Pract; 1980; ():107-21. PubMed ID: 10309443 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Editorial comment--stroke cost-effectiveness research: are acceptability curves acceptable? Holloway R; Dick AW Stroke; 2004 Jan; 35(1):203-4. PubMed ID: 14684768 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Cardiac transplantation: the second round. Lancet; 1980 Mar; 1(8170):687-8. PubMed ID: 6103094 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness of drug abuse treatment: relevant issues and alternative longitudinal modeling approaches. Hser YI; Anglin MD NIDA Res Monogr; 1991; 113():67-93. PubMed ID: 1762644 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]