231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18815850)
1. Computer navigation-assisted versus minimally invasive TKA: benefits and drawbacks.
Bonutti PM; Dethmers D; Ulrich SD; Seyler TM; Mont MA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2008 Nov; 466(11):2756-62. PubMed ID: 18815850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 2017 Chitranjan S. Ranawat Award: Does Computer Navigation in Knee Arthroplasty Improve Functional Outcomes in Young Patients? A Randomized Study.
Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Jan; 476(1):6-15. PubMed ID: 29389753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Results of computer assisted mini-incision subvastus approach for total knee arthroplasty.
Turajane T; Larbpaiboonpong V; Kongtharvonskul J; Maungsiri S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Dec; 92 Suppl 6():S51-8. PubMed ID: 20120665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of implantation during computer-assisted minimally invasive Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a comparison with a conventional instrumented technique.
Jung KA; Kim SJ; Lee SC; Hwang SH; Ahn NK
Knee; 2010 Dec; 17(6):387-91. PubMed ID: 19945880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Midterm outcomes of electromagnetic computer-assisted navigation in minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty.
Thiengwittayaporn S; Kanjanapiboonwong A; Junsee D
J Orthop Surg Res; 2013 Oct; 8():37. PubMed ID: 24161011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improved accuracy of component alignment with the implementation of image-free navigation in total knee arthroplasty.
Rosenberger RE; Hoser C; Quirbach S; Attal R; Hennerbichler A; Fink C
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2008 Mar; 16(3):249-57. PubMed ID: 18157493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Navigation did not improve the precision of minimally invasive knee arthroplasty.
Bonutti PM; Dethmers DA; McGrath MS; Ulrich SD; Mont MA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2008 Nov; 466(11):2730-5. PubMed ID: 18618213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Total knee arthroplasty in patients with Ranawat type-II valgus arthritic knee with a marked coronal femoral bowing deformity: comparison between computer-assisted surgery and intra-articular resection.
Huang TW; Chuang PY; Lee CY; Lin SJ; Huang KC; Shen SH; Tsai YH; Lee MS; Hsu RW
J Orthop Surg Res; 2016 Aug; 11(1):88. PubMed ID: 27488841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robot-assisted implantation improves the precision of component position in minimally invasive TKA.
Kim SM; Park YS; Ha CW; Lim SJ; Moon YW
Orthopedics; 2012 Sep; 35(9):e1334-9. PubMed ID: 22955398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computer-assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with standard total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized study.
Dutton AQ; Yeo SJ; Yang KY; Lo NN; Chia KU; Chong HC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Jan; 90(1):2-9. PubMed ID: 18171951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computer-navigated versus conventional total knee arthroplasty a prospective randomized trial.
Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Nov; 94(22):2017-24. PubMed ID: 23052635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer-navigated minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty for patients with retained implants in the femur.
Lin SY; Chen CH; Huang PJ; Fu YC; Huang HT
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2014 Aug; 30(8):415-21. PubMed ID: 25002380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mechanical accuracy of navigated minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty (MIS TKA).
Biasca N; Wirth S; Bungartz M
Knee; 2009 Jan; 16(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 19070495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of computer-navigated and conventional total knee arthroplasty in patients with Ranawat type-II valgus deformity: medium-term clinical and radiological results.
Huang TW; Lee CY; Lin SJ; Peng KT; Huang KC; Lee MS; Hsu RW; Shen WJ
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2014 Nov; 15():390. PubMed ID: 25416446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prediction of post-operative range of motion using intra-operative soft tissue balance in total knee arthroplasty with navigation.
Hasegawa M; Takagita H; Sudo A
Comput Aided Surg; 2015; 20(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 26291504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical and radiologic outcomes of contemporary 3 techniques of TKA.
Yang JH; Yoon JR; Pandher DS; Oh KJ
Orthopedics; 2010 Oct; 33(10 Suppl):76-81. PubMed ID: 20954636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Five-year follow-up of minimally invasive computer assisted total knee arthroplasty (MICATKA) versus conventional computer assisted total knee arthroplasty (CATKA) - A population matched study.
Khakha RS; Chowdhry M; Norris M; Kheiran A; Patel N; Chauhan SK
Knee; 2014 Oct; 21(5):944-8. PubMed ID: 25086899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: comparison of jig-based technique versus computer navigation for clinical and alignment outcome.
Hasegawa M; Yoshida K; Wakabayashi H; Sudo A
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2011 Jun; 19(6):904-10. PubMed ID: 20811732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty using mini midvastus or medial parapatellar approach technique: A prospective, randomized, international multicentre trial.
Feczko P; Engelmann L; Arts JJ; Campbell D
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Jan; 17():19. PubMed ID: 26762175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Total knee arthroplasty with use of computer-assisted navigation compared with conventional guiding systems in the same patient: radiographic results in Asian patients.
Huang TW; Hsu WH; Peng KT; Hsu RW; Weng YJ; Shen WJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Jul; 93(13):1197-202. PubMed ID: 21776572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
