371 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18816324)
1. Engaging the public in priority-setting for health technology assessment: findings from a citizens' jury.
Menon D; Stafinski T
Health Expect; 2008 Sep; 11(3):282-93. PubMed ID: 18816324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Citizens' juries in planning research priorities: process, engagement and outcome.
Gooberman-Hill R; Horwood J; Calnan M
Health Expect; 2008 Sep; 11(3):272-81. PubMed ID: 18816323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. From passive subject to active agent: the potential of Citizens' Juries for nursing research.
Iredale R; Longley M
Nurse Educ Today; 2007 Oct; 27(7):788-95. PubMed ID: 17157967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing the impact of deliberative processes on the views of participants: is it 'in one ear and out the other'?
Stafinski T; Menon D; Yasui Y
Health Expect; 2014 Apr; 17(2):278-90. PubMed ID: 22296492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Grounded citizens' juries: a tool for health activism?
Kashefi E; Mort M
Health Expect; 2004 Dec; 7(4):290-302. PubMed ID: 15544682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating the use of citizens' juries in food policy: a case study of food regulation.
Henderson J; House E; Coveney J; Meyer S; Ankeny R; Ward P; Calnan M
BMC Public Health; 2013 Jun; 13():596. PubMed ID: 23782688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Setting priorities: is there a role for citizens' juries?
Lenaghan J; New B; Mitchell E
BMJ; 1996 Jun; 312(7046):1591-3. PubMed ID: 8664672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The use of citizens' juries in health policy decision-making: a systematic review.
Street J; Duszynski K; Krawczyk S; Braunack-Mayer A
Soc Sci Med; 2014 May; 109():1-9. PubMed ID: 24657639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Investigating the Extent to Which Patients Should Control Access to Patient Records for Research: A Deliberative Process Using Citizens' Juries.
Tully MP; Bozentko K; Clement S; Hunn A; Hassan L; Norris R; Oswald M; Peek N
J Med Internet Res; 2018 Mar; 20(3):e112. PubMed ID: 29592847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Engaging the public in healthcare decision-making: results from a Citizens' Jury on emergency care services.
Scuffham PA; Moretto N; Krinks R; Burton P; Whitty JA; Wilson A; Fitzgerald G; Littlejohns P; Kendall E
Emerg Med J; 2016 Nov; 33(11):782-788. PubMed ID: 27323789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Social values and health priority setting in Australia: an analysis applied to the context of health technology assessment.
Whitty JA; Littlejohns P
Health Policy; 2015 Feb; 119(2):127-36. PubMed ID: 25267072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Do consumer voices in health-care citizens' juries matter?
Krinks R; Kendall E; Whitty JA; Scuffham PA
Health Expect; 2016 Oct; 19(5):1015-22. PubMed ID: 26414486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Engaging the public in healthcare decision-making: quantifying preferences for healthcare through citizens' juries.
Scuffham PA; Ratcliffe J; Kendall E; Burton P; Wilson A; Chalkidou K; Littlejohns P; Whitty JA
BMJ Open; 2014 May; 4(5):e005437. PubMed ID: 24793259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of information and deliberation on the consistency of preferences for prioritization in health care - evidence from discrete choice experiments undertaken alongside citizens' juries.
Whitty JA; Littlejohns P; Ratcliffe J; Rixon K; Wilson A; Kendall E; Burton P; Chalkidou K; Scuffham PA
J Med Econ; 2023; 26(1):1237-1249. PubMed ID: 37738383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cystic fibrosis: to screen or not to screen? Involving a Citizens' jury in decisions on screening carrier.
Mosconi P; Castellani C; Villani W; Satolli R
Health Expect; 2015 Dec; 18(6):1956-67. PubMed ID: 25200794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Public attitudes towards novel reproductive technologies: a citizens' jury on mitochondrial donation.
Newson AJ; de Lacey S; Dowling DK; Murray S; Sue CM; Thorburn DR; Gillam L; Degeling C
Hum Reprod; 2019 Apr; 34(4):751-757. PubMed ID: 30865256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A citizens' jury on regulation of McDonald's products and operations in Australia in response to a corporate health impact assessment.
Anaf J; Baum F; Fisher M
Aust N Z J Public Health; 2018 Apr; 42(2):133-139. PubMed ID: 29384238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How a deliberative approach includes women in the decisions of screening mammography: a citizens' jury feasibility study in Andalusia, Spain.
Baena-Cañada JM; Luque-Ribelles V; Quílez-Cutillas A; Rosado-Varela P; Benítez-Rodríguez E; Márquez-Calderón S; Rivera-Bautista JM
BMJ Open; 2018 May; 8(5):e019852. PubMed ID: 29730621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Involving a Citizens' Jury in Decisions on Individual Screening for Prostate Cancer.
Mosconi P; Colombo C; Satolli R; Carzaniga S; ;
PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0143176. PubMed ID: 26751212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Recommendations from Two Citizens' Juries on the Surgical Management of Obesity.
Scuffham PA; Krinks R; Chalkidou K; Littlejohns P; Whitty JA; Wilson A; Burton P; Kendall E
Obes Surg; 2018 Jun; 28(6):1745-1752. PubMed ID: 29308534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
