These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18816378)

  • 1. Clearing up the hazy road from bench to bedside: a framework for integrating the fourth hurdle into translational medicine.
    Rogowski WH; Hartz SC; John JH
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2008 Sep; 8():194. PubMed ID: 18816378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How should cost-effectiveness analysis be used in health technology coverage decisions? Evidence from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence approach.
    Williams I; Bryan S; McIver S
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2007 Apr; 12(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 17407655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An economic theory of the fourth hurdle.
    Rogowski WH
    Health Econ; 2013 May; 22(5):600-10. PubMed ID: 22544431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Decision-analytical modelling of costs per QALY in the context of the German Social Law].
    Rogowski WH; Landauer M; John J
    Gesundheitswesen; 2009 Nov; 71(11):739-50. PubMed ID: 19551622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A structured tool to analyse coverage decisions: development and feasibility test in the field of cancer screening and prevention.
    Fischer KE; Leidl R; Rogowski WH
    Health Policy; 2011 Aug; 101(3):290-9. PubMed ID: 21529980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development and implementation of health technology assessment in Argentina: two steps forward and one step back.
    Rubinstein A; Pichon-Riviere A; Augustovski F
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Jul; 25 Suppl 1():260-9. PubMed ID: 19527545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness analysis and formulary decision making in England: findings from research.
    Williams IP; Bryan S
    Soc Sci Med; 2007 Nov; 65(10):2116-29. PubMed ID: 17698271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2397-406. PubMed ID: 12692171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Criteria and procedures for determining benefit packages in health care. A comparative perspective.
    Gress S; Niebuhr D; Rothgang H; Wasem J
    Health Policy; 2005 Jul; 73(1):78-91. PubMed ID: 15911059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Medicare's coverage of colorectal cancer drugs: a case study in evidence development and policy.
    Carino T; Williams RD; Colbert AM; Bridger P
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2006; 25(5):1231-9. PubMed ID: 16966718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Role of technology assessment in health benefits coverage for medical devices.
    Braslow NM; Shatin D; McCarthy DB; Newcomer LN
    Am J Manag Care; 1998 Sep; 4 Spec No():SP139-50. PubMed ID: 10185990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of economic evaluation in local health care decision-making in England: a qualitative investigation.
    Eddama O; Coast J
    Health Policy; 2009 Mar; 89(3):261-70. PubMed ID: 18657336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
    Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How to anticipate the assessment of the public health benefit of new medicines?
    Massol J; Puech A; Boissel JP;
    Therapie; 2007; 62(5):427-35. PubMed ID: 18206104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The origin of informed consent].
    Mallardi V
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reimbursement and clinical guidance for pharmaceuticals in Sweden: do health-economic evaluations support decision making?
    Anell A; Persson U
    Eur J Health Econ; 2005 Sep; 6(3):274-9. PubMed ID: 15968561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Guidelines and Value-Based Decision Making: An Evolving Role for Payers.
    McCauley JL
    N C Med J; 2015; 76(4):243-6. PubMed ID: 26509518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.