These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18816635)

  • 1. CT, MRI and ultrasound scanning rates: evaluation of cancer diagnosis, staging and surveillance in Ontario.
    Coburn N; Przybysz R; Barbera L; Hodgson D; Sharir S; Laupacis A; Law C
    J Surg Oncol; 2008 Dec; 98(7):490-9. PubMed ID: 18816635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of CT and MRI scanning among cancer patients in Ontario.
    Coburn N; Przybysz R; Barbera L; Hodgson DC; Laupacis A; Law C
    Clin Imaging; 2011; 35(4):301-8. PubMed ID: 21724124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Utilization patterns of diagnostic imaging across the late life course: a population-based study in Ontario, Canada.
    Wang L; Nie JX; Tracy CS; Moineddin R; Upshur RE
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(4):384-90. PubMed ID: 18828931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preauthorization of CT and MRI examinations: assessment of a managed care preauthorization program based on the ACR Appropriateness Criteria and the Royal College of Radiology guidelines.
    Blachar A; Tal S; Mandel A; Novikov I; Polliack G; Sosna J; Freedman Y; Copel L; Shemer J
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Nov; 3(11):851-9. PubMed ID: 17412184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Growth rates in pediatric diagnostic imaging and sedation.
    Wachtel RE; Dexter F; Dow AJ
    Anesth Analg; 2009 May; 108(5):1616-21. PubMed ID: 19372345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of a CT and MR preauthorization program on ED utilization.
    Smulowitz PB; Ngo L; Epstein SK
    Am J Emerg Med; 2009 Mar; 27(3):328-32. PubMed ID: 19328378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variation in MRI/CT utilization among FAMILY physicians and general internists in a multi-specialty group practice.
    Couchman GR; Forjuoh SN; Reis MD; Bartels G; Lindzey D
    Med Sci Monit; 2005 Mar; 11(3):MT19-25. PubMed ID: 15735575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Increased use of MRI for breast cancer surveillance and staging is not associated with increased rate of mastectomy.
    Dang CM; Zaghiyan K; Karlan SR; Phillips EH
    Am Surg; 2009 Oct; 75(10):937-40. PubMed ID: 19886139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Non-adherence to recommendations for further testing after outpatient CT and MRI.
    You JJ; Laupacis A; Newman A; Bell CM
    Am J Med; 2010 Jun; 123(6):557.e1-8. PubMed ID: 20569765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Liver lesion detection and characterization in patients with colorectal cancer: a comparison of low radiation dose non-enhanced PET/CT, contrast-enhanced PET/CT, and liver MRI.
    Cantwell CP; Setty BN; Holalkere N; Sahani DV; Fischman AJ; Blake MA
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008; 32(5):738-44. PubMed ID: 18830103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnosis of breast cancer: MDCT versus MRI.
    Tozaki M
    Breast Cancer; 2008; 15(3):205-11. PubMed ID: 18443898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The efficacy of diffusion-weighted imaging for the detection of colorectal cancer.
    Shinya S; Sasaki T; Nakagawa Y; Guiquing Z; Yamamoto F; Yamashita Y
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2009; 56(89):128-32. PubMed ID: 19453043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Utilization of preoperative imaging in uterine cancer patients.
    Gien LT; Barbera L; Kupets R; Saskin R; Paszat L
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Nov; 115(2):226-30. PubMed ID: 19683807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Availability and quality of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging equipment in U.S. emergency departments.
    Ginde AA; Foianini A; Renner DM; Valley M; Camargo CA
    Acad Emerg Med; 2008 Aug; 15(8):780-3. PubMed ID: 18783491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Utilization trends for advanced imaging procedures: evidence from individuals with private insurance coverage in California.
    Mitchell JM
    Med Care; 2008 May; 46(5):460-6. PubMed ID: 18438193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Imaging juvenile idiopathic arthritis: assessing the modalities.
    McKay GM; Cox LA; Long BW
    Radiol Technol; 2010; 81(4):318-27. PubMed ID: 20207788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trends in diagnostic imaging utilization in a university hospital in Turkey.
    Semin S; Demiral Y; Dicle O
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2006; 22(4):532-6. PubMed ID: 16984689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The clinical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing focal hepatic lesions and suspected cancer.
    Shah AJ; Parsons B; Pope I; Callaway M; Finch-Jones MD; Thomas MG
    Clin Imaging; 2009; 33(3):209-12. PubMed ID: 19411027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic breast magnetic resonance imaging and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.
    Sorbero ME; Dick AW; Beckjord EB; Ahrendt G
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Jun; 16(6):1597-605. PubMed ID: 19330381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recent trends in utilization rates of noncardiac thoracic imaging: an example of how imaging growth might be controlled.
    Levin DC; Rao VM; Parker L; Frangos AJ; Sunshine JH
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Dec; 4(12):886-9. PubMed ID: 18047983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.