106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18816815)
21. Measurements of diagnostic examination performance using quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient and proton MR spectroscopic imaging in the preoperative evaluation of tumor grade in cerebral gliomas.
Server A; Kulle B; Gadmar ØB; Josefsen R; Kumar T; Nakstad PH
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):462-70. PubMed ID: 20708868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Automatic knee cartilage segmentation from multi-contrast MR images using support vector machine classification with spatial dependencies.
Zhang K; Lu W; Marziliano P
Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Dec; 31(10):1731-43. PubMed ID: 23867282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Optimizing Texture Retrieving Model for Multimodal MR Image-Based Support Vector Machine for Classifying Glioma.
Yang Y; Yan LF; Zhang X; Nan HY; Hu YC; Han Y; Zhang J; Liu ZC; Sun YZ; Tian Q; Yu Y; Sun Q; Wang SY; Zhang X; Wang W; Cui GB
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 May; 49(5):1263-1274. PubMed ID: 30623514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Data-driven grading of brain gliomas: a multiparametric MR imaging study.
Caulo M; Panara V; Tortora D; Mattei PA; Briganti C; Pravatà E; Salice S; Cotroneo AR; Tartaro A
Radiology; 2014 Aug; 272(2):494-503. PubMed ID: 24661247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. 3D brain tumor segmentation in multimodal MR images based on learning population- and patient-specific feature sets.
Jiang J; Wu Y; Huang M; Yang W; Chen W; Feng Q
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2013; 37(7-8):512-21. PubMed ID: 23816459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Semiquantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for accurate classification of complex adnexal masses.
Kazerooni AF; Malek M; Haghighatkhah H; Parviz S; Nabil M; Torbati L; Assili S; Saligheh Rad H; Gity M
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Feb; 45(2):418-427. PubMed ID: 27367786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Optimizing a machine learning based glioma grading system using multi-parametric MRI histogram and texture features.
Zhang X; Yan LF; Hu YC; Li G; Yang Y; Han Y; Sun YZ; Liu ZC; Tian Q; Han ZY; Liu LD; Hu BQ; Qiu ZY; Wang W; Cui GB
Oncotarget; 2017 Jul; 8(29):47816-47830. PubMed ID: 28599282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Okafuji T; Kamitani T; Soeda H; Setoguchi T; Sakai S; Hatakenaka M; Kubo M; Sadanaga N; Yamamoto H; Honda H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 28(5):1157-65. PubMed ID: 18972357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Primary and metastatic intraaxial brain tumors: prospective comparison of multivoxel 2D chemical-shift imaging (CSI) proton MR spectroscopy, perfusion MRI, and histopathological findings in a group of 159 patients.
Bendini M; Marton E; Feletti A; Rossi S; Curtolo S; Inches I; Ronzon M; Longatti P; Di Paola F
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2011 Feb; 153(2):403-12. PubMed ID: 21165751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Machine learning study of several classifiers trained with texture analysis features to differentiate benign from malignant soft-tissue tumors in T1-MRI images.
Juntu J; Sijbers J; De Backer S; Rajan J; Van Dyck D
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Mar; 31(3):680-9. PubMed ID: 20187212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. COMPARE: classification of morphological patterns using adaptive regional elements.
Fan Y; Shen D; Gur RC; Gur RE; Davatzikos C
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Jan; 26(1):93-105. PubMed ID: 17243588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A prospective study on the added value of pulsed arterial spin-labeling and apparent diffusion coefficients in the grading of gliomas.
Kim HS; Kim SY
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2007 Oct; 28(9):1693-9. PubMed ID: 17885229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Semiquantitative assessment of intratumoral susceptibility signals using non-contrast-enhanced high-field high-resolution susceptibility-weighted imaging in patients with gliomas: comparison with MR perfusion imaging.
Park MJ; Kim HS; Jahng GH; Ryu CW; Park SM; Kim SY
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2009 Aug; 30(7):1402-8. PubMed ID: 19369602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Recurrent cerebral gliomas in MRI and Iodine-123[corrected]-alpha-methyl-tyrosine SPECT: the use of digitally fused images.
Grzelak P; Górska-Chrzastek M; Gajewicz W; Kuśmierek J; Tybor K; Stefańczyk L
Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur; 2005; 8(2):94-9. PubMed ID: 16437393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Utility of multiparametric 3-T MRI for glioma characterization.
Roy B; Gupta RK; Maudsley AA; Awasthi R; Sheriff S; Gu M; Husain N; Mohakud S; Behari S; Pandey CM; Rathore RK; Spielman DM; Alger JR
Neuroradiology; 2013 May; 55(5):603-13. PubMed ID: 23377234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Quantifying spatial heterogeneity in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parameter maps.
Rose CJ; Mills SJ; O'Connor JP; Buonaccorsi GA; Roberts C; Watson Y; Cheung S; Zhao S; Whitcher B; Jackson A; Parker GJ
Magn Reson Med; 2009 Aug; 62(2):488-99. PubMed ID: 19466747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Distinguishing tumefactive demyelinating lesions from glioma or central nervous system lymphoma: added value of unenhanced CT compared with conventional contrast-enhanced MR imaging.
Kim DS; Na DG; Kim KH; Kim JH; Kim E; Yun BL; Chang KH
Radiology; 2009 May; 251(2):467-75. PubMed ID: 19261924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Subcompartmentalization of extracellular extravascular space (EES) into permeability and leaky space with local arterial input function (AIF) results in improved discrimination between high- and low-grade glioma using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI.
Sahoo P; Rathore RK; Awasthi R; Roy B; Verma S; Rathore D; Behari S; Husain M; Husain N; Pandey CM; Mohakud S; Gupta RK
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Sep; 38(3):677-88. PubMed ID: 23390002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Can structural MRI aid in clinical classification? A machine learning study in two independent samples of patients with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and healthy subjects.
Schnack HG; Nieuwenhuis M; van Haren NE; Abramovic L; Scheewe TW; Brouwer RM; Hulshoff Pol HE; Kahn RS
Neuroimage; 2014 Jan; 84():299-306. PubMed ID: 24004694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Machine learning methods for the classification of gliomas: Initial results using features extracted from MR spectroscopy.
Ranjith G; Parvathy R; Vikas V; Chandrasekharan K; Nair S
Neuroradiol J; 2015 Apr; 28(2):106-11. PubMed ID: 25923676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
