These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18816986)

  • 1. An evaluation of the high-probability instruction sequence with and without programmed reinforcement for compliance with high-probability instructions.
    Zuluaga CA; Normand MP
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2008; 41(3):453-7. PubMed ID: 18816986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Further evaluation of the high-probability instructional sequence with and without programmed reinforcement.
    Wilder DA; Majdalany L; Sturkie L; Smeltz L
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015 Sep; 48(3):511-22. PubMed ID: 25998741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of high-p and low-p instruction similarity on compliance among young children.
    Lipschultz JL; Wilder DA; Ertel H; Enderli A
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2018 Oct; 51(4):866-878. PubMed ID: 29911333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the high-probability instructional sequence to increase compliance with multiple low-probability instructions among children with autism.
    Rosales MK; Wilder DA; Montalvo M; Fagan B
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2021 Apr; 54(2):760-769. PubMed ID: 33029788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Effect of Various High-Probability to Low-Probability Instruction Ratios During the Use of the High-Probability Instructional Sequence.
    Ertel H; Wilder DA; Hodges A; Hurtado L
    Behav Modif; 2019 Sep; 43(5):639-655. PubMed ID: 29902925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A method to establish stimulus control and compliance with instructions.
    Borgen JG; Charles Mace F; Cavanaugh BM; Shamlian K; Lit KR; Wilson JB; Trauschke SL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2017 Oct; 50(4):830-842. PubMed ID: 28940482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Further evaluation of response-independent delivery of preferred stimuli and child compliance.
    Normand MP; Beaulieu L
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2011; 44(3):665-9. PubMed ID: 21941401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Teachers' instructions and children's compliance in preschool classrooms: a descriptive analysis.
    Atwater JB; Morris EK
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1988; 21(2):157-67. PubMed ID: 3417579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A developmental analysis of rule-following.
    Riegler HC; Baer DM
    Adv Child Dev Behav; 1989; 21():191-219. PubMed ID: 2665430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An analysis of stimuli that influence compliance during the high-probability instruction sequence.
    Normand MP; Kestner K; Jessel J
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2010; 43(4):735-8. PubMed ID: 21541158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of a high-probability instruction sequence and response-independent reinforcer delivery on child compliance.
    Bullock C; Normand MP
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2006; 39(4):495-9. PubMed ID: 17236350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of positive and negative reinforcement for compliance to treat problem behavior maintained by escape.
    Slocum SK; Vollmer TR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015 Sep; 48(3):563-74. PubMed ID: 25969379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pre-assessment exposure to schedule-correlated stimuli affects choice responding for tasks.
    Kelley ME; Shamlian K; Lomas JE; Pabico RS
    Res Dev Disabil; 2011; 32(2):527-31. PubMed ID: 21232917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of strategic versus tactical instructions on adaptation to changing contingencies in children with adhd.
    Bicard DE; Neef NA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2002; 35(4):375-89. PubMed ID: 12555909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using the high-probability instructional sequence to improve initiation and completion of low-probability instructions in young autistic children.
    Russo DA; Blair KC
    Res Dev Disabil; 2023 Mar; 134():104422. PubMed ID: 36610208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An evaluation of strategies to maintain mands at practical levels.
    Sidener TM; Shabani DB; Carr JE; Roland JP
    Res Dev Disabil; 2006; 27(6):632-44. PubMed ID: 16298103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differential reinforcement of other behavior and noncontingent reinforcement as control procedures during the modification of a preschooler's compliance.
    Goetz EM; Holmberg MC; LeBlanc JM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1975; 8(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 1141083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analyzing Consequence Variables Within the High-Probability Instructional Sequence for a Child Diagnosed With CHARGE Syndrome.
    Davis CR; Axe JB
    Behav Anal Pract; 2021 Jun; 14(2):352-359. PubMed ID: 34150451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. For children with learning disabilities. Programmed instruction versus therapist instruction.
    Driscoll MC; Abelson C
    Am J Occup Ther; 1972 Mar; 26(2):78-80. PubMed ID: 5014203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of reinforcement value on instruction following under schedules of negative reinforcement.
    Alessandri J; Cançado CRX; Abreu-Rodrigues J
    Behav Processes; 2017 Dec; 145():27-30. PubMed ID: 28993244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.