These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18817110)

  • 1. The development of industry-specific odor impact criteria for feedlots using models.
    Henry CG; Watts PJ; Nicholas PJ
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2008 Sep; 58(9):1177-86. PubMed ID: 18817110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correlating emissions with time and temperature to predict worst-case emissions from open liquid area sources.
    Nagaraj A; Sattler ML
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2005 Aug; 55(8):1077-84. PubMed ID: 16187578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Characterizing ammonia emissions from swine farms in eastern North Carolina: part 2--potential environmentally superior technologies for waste treatment.
    Aneja VP; Arya SP; Rumsey IC; Kim DS; Bajwa K; Arkinson HL; Semunegus H; Dickey DA; Stefanski LA; Todd L; Mottus K; Robarge WP; Williams CM
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2008 Sep; 58(9):1145-57. PubMed ID: 18817107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preventive control of odor emissions through manipulation of operational parameters during the active phase of composting.
    Zhang W; Lau AK; Wen ZS
    J Environ Sci Health B; 2009 Jun; 44(5):496-505. PubMed ID: 20183055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Chemical-sensory characterization of dairy manure odor using headspace solid-phase microextraction and multidimensional gas chromatography mass spectrometry-olfactometry.
    Laor Y; Koziel JA; Cai L; Ravid U
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2008 Sep; 58(9):1187-97. PubMed ID: 18817111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Atmospheric ammonia, volatile fatty acids, and other odorants near beef feedlots.
    McGinn SM; Janzen HH; Coates T
    J Environ Qual; 2003; 32(4):1173-82. PubMed ID: 12931870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impacts of feedlot floor condition, deposition frequency, and inhibitors on N
    Liao W; Liu C; Gao Z
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2018 Jul; 68(7):700-712. PubMed ID: 29630461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Concentrations of particulate matter emitted from large cattle feedlots in Kansas.
    Guo L; Maghirang RG; Razote EB; Trabue SL; McConnell LL
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2011 Oct; 61(10):1026-35. PubMed ID: 22070035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Field measurement of beef pen manure methane and nitrous oxide reveals a surprise for inventory calculations.
    Redding MR; Devereux J; Phillips F; Lewis R; Naylor T; Kearton T; Hill CJ; Weidemann S
    J Environ Qual; 2015 May; 44(3):720-8. PubMed ID: 26024253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Incorporation of thymol into corncob granules for reduction of odor and pathogens in feedlot cattle waste.
    Varel VH; Miller DN; Berry ED
    J Anim Sci; 2006 Feb; 84(2):481-7. PubMed ID: 16424277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Odor control for livestock systems.
    Powers WJ
    J Anim Sci; 1999; 77 Suppl 2():169-76. PubMed ID: 15526792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effectiveness of porous covers for control of ammonia, reduced sulfur compounds, total hydrocarbons, selected volatile organic compounds, and odor from hog manure storage lagoons.
    Regmi S; Ongwandee M; Morrison G; Fitch M; Surampalli R
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2007 Jun; 57(6):761-8. PubMed ID: 17608010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Snapshot of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from a Cattle Feedlot.
    Bai M; Flesch TK; McGinn SM; Chen D
    J Environ Qual; 2015 Nov; 44(6):1974-8. PubMed ID: 26641350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. CH4 and N2O emissions from China's beef feedlots with ad libitum and restricted feeding in fall and spring seasons.
    Lin Z; Liao W; Yang Y; Gao Z; Ma W; Wang D; Cao Y; Li J; Cai Z
    Environ Res; 2015 Apr; 138():391-400. PubMed ID: 25769128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dispersion modeling to compare alternative technologies for odor remediation at swine facilities.
    Schiffman SS; Graham BG; Williams CM
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2008 Sep; 58(9):1166-76. PubMed ID: 18817109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Odor compounds in waste gas emissions from agricultural operations and food industries.
    Rappert S; Müller R
    Waste Manag; 2005; 25(9):887-907. PubMed ID: 16129591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laboratory investigation of supported permeable organic covers for the management of odour emissions from anaerobic piggery waste ponds.
    Hudson N; Casey K; Melvin S; Nicholas P
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(9):317-26. PubMed ID: 11762479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ammonia Emission from a Beef Cattle Feedlot and Its Local Dry Deposition and Re-Emission.
    McGinn SM; Janzen HH; Coates TW; Beauchemin KA; Flesch TK
    J Environ Qual; 2016 Jul; 45(4):1178-85. PubMed ID: 27380065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A field study on downwind odor transport from swine facilities.
    Zhu J; Li X
    J Environ Sci Health B; 2000 Mar; 35(2):245-58. PubMed ID: 10736772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measurements techniques and models to assess odor annoyance: A review.
    Conti C; Guarino M; Bacenetti J
    Environ Int; 2020 Jan; 134():105261. PubMed ID: 31704563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.