292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18817568)
1. "Enhanced" interrogation of detainees: do psychologists and psychiatrists participate?
Halpern AL; Halpern JH; Doherty SB
Philos Ethics Humanit Med; 2008 Sep; 3():21. PubMed ID: 18817568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contrasting ethical policies of physicians and psychologists concerning interrogation of detainees.
Pope KS; Gutheil TG
BMJ; 2009 Apr; 338():b1653. PubMed ID: 19406892
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Psychologists and detainee interrogations: key decisions, opportunities lost, and lessons learned.
Pope KS
Annu Rev Clin Psychol; 2011; 7():459-81. PubMed ID: 21219192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The ethics of interrogation and the American Psychological Association: a critique of policy and process.
Olson B; Soldz S; Davis M
Philos Ethics Humanit Med; 2008 Jan; 3():3. PubMed ID: 18230171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Psychologists abandon the Nuremberg ethic: concerns for detainee interrogations.
Pope KS; Gutheil TG
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2009; 32(3):161-6. PubMed ID: 19299016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Medical ethics and the interrogation of Guantanamo 063.
Miles SH
Am J Bioeth; 2007 Apr; 7(4):5-11. PubMed ID: 17454984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Militarism, human welfare, and the APA Ethical Principles of Psychologists.
Summers C
Ethics Behav; 1992; 2(4):287-310. PubMed ID: 11651615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ethical considerations on the complicity of psychologists and scientists in torture.
Evans NG; Sisti DA; Moreno JD
J R Army Med Corps; 2019 Aug; 165(4):248-255. PubMed ID: 30792344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Responsible interrogation.
Nature; 2009 May; 459(7245):300. PubMed ID: 19458664
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Failing ethics 101: psychologists, the U.S. military establishment, and human rights.
Boyd JW; LoCicero A; Malowney M; Aldis R; Marlin RP
Int J Health Serv; 2014; 44(3):615-25. PubMed ID: 25618992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Why physicians should not be involved in hostile interrogations - a response to Heilig's editorial.
Davis M
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2014 Oct; 23(4):452-60. PubMed ID: 25032939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. US psychologists banned from participating in national security interrogations.
McCarthy M
BMJ; 2015 Aug; 351():h4339. PubMed ID: 26259862
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The nurse, the Geneva Conventions and human rights.
Int Nurs Rev; 1992; 39(2):61-3. PubMed ID: 1582772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Glimpses of Guantanamo--medical ethics and the war on terror.
Okie S
N Engl J Med; 2005 Dec; 353(24):2529-34. PubMed ID: 16354888
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. 2010 Amendments to the 2002 "Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct".
Am Psychol; 2010; 65(5):493. PubMed ID: 20642307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Medical ethics at Guantanamo Bay and Abu Ghraib: the problem of dual loyalty.
Clark PA
J Law Med Ethics; 2006; 34(3):570-80, 481. PubMed ID: 17144181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lies and coercion: why psychiatrists should not participate in police and intelligence interrogations.
Janofsky JS
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2006; 34(4):472-8. PubMed ID: 17185476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The ethics of interrogation--the U.S. military's ongoing use of psychiatrists.
Marks JH; Bloche MG
N Engl J Med; 2008 Sep; 359(11):1090-2. PubMed ID: 18784097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Medical ethics and torture.
Sagan LA; Jonsen A
N Engl J Med; 1976 Jun; 294(26):1427-30. PubMed ID: 944852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ethical dilemmas for physicians in time of war.
Rosner F
Isr Med Assoc J; 2010 Mar; 12(3):133-5. PubMed ID: 20684174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
