These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1881762)

  • 1. Visual field effects in the discrimination of sine-wave gratings.
    Kitterle FL; Selig LM
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Jul; 50(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 1881762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hemispheric asymmetries for spatial frequency discrimination in a selective attention task.
    Proverbio AM; Zani A; Avella C
    Brain Cogn; 1997 Jul; 34(2):311-20. PubMed ID: 9220094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual hemispheric asymmetries depend on which spatial frequencies are task relevant.
    Kitterle FL; Hellige JB; Christman S
    Brain Cogn; 1992 Nov; 20(2):308-14. PubMed ID: 1449760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hemispheric asymmetry in the processing of absolute versus relative spatial frequency.
    Christman S; Kitterle FL; Hellige J
    Brain Cogn; 1991 May; 16(1):62-73. PubMed ID: 1854470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hemispheric asymmetry in the processing of high and low spatial frequencies: a facial recognition task.
    Keenan PA; Whitman RD; Pepe J
    Brain Cogn; 1989 Nov; 11(2):229-37. PubMed ID: 2803762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hemispheric differences in the interference among components of compound gratings.
    Kitterle FL; Christman S; Conesa J
    Percept Psychophys; 1993 Dec; 54(6):785-93. PubMed ID: 8134248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hemispheric differences are found in the identification, but not the detection, of low versus high spatial frequencies.
    Kitterle FL; Christman S; Hellige JB
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Oct; 48(4):297-306. PubMed ID: 2243753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hemispheric processing of spatial frequencies in two commissurotomy patients.
    Fendrich R; Gazzaniga M
    Neuropsychologia; 1990; 28(7):657-63. PubMed ID: 2120611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spatial frequency discrimination and detection characteristics for gratings defined by orientation texture.
    Gray R; Regan D
    Vision Res; 1998 Sep; 38(17):2601-17. PubMed ID: 12116706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of high spatial frequencies in hemispheric processing of categorical and coordinate spatial relations.
    Okubo M; Michimata C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Nov; 16(9):1576-82. PubMed ID: 15601520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatial frequencies and the cerebral hemispheres: contrast sensitivity, visible persistence, and letter classification.
    Peterzell DH; Harvey LO; Hardyck CD
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Nov; 46(5):443-55. PubMed ID: 2813029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hemispheric patterns in visual search.
    Polich J
    Brain Cogn; 1984 Apr; 3(2):128-39. PubMed ID: 6537246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual field differences in spatial frequency discrimination.
    Niebauer CL; Christman SD
    Brain Cogn; 1999 Dec; 41(3):381-9. PubMed ID: 10585243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of perceptual reference frames in visual field asymmetries.
    Robertson LC; Lamb MR
    Neuropsychologia; 1988; 26(1):145-52. PubMed ID: 3362340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Delayed pattern discrimination in patients with unilateral temporal lobe damage.
    Greenlee MW; Rischewski J; Mergner T; Seeger W
    J Neurosci; 1993 Jun; 13(6):2565-74. PubMed ID: 8501522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Decision strategies and visual-field asymmetries in same-different judgments of word meaning.
    Francis MA; Irwin RJ
    Mem Cognit; 1995 May; 23(3):301-12. PubMed ID: 7791599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spatial and temporal frequency in figure-ground organization.
    Klymenko V; Weisstein N; Topolski R; Hsieh CH
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 May; 45(5):395-403. PubMed ID: 2726401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of script direction on word processing modes in left and right visual fields.
    Siéroff E; Slama Y
    Laterality; 2018 Jul; 23(4):479-500. PubMed ID: 29141494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Flexible contrast gain control in the right hemisphere.
    Okubo M; Nicholls ME
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Dec; 59(3):269-76. PubMed ID: 16169137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What do lateralized displays tell us about visual word perception? A cautionary indication from the word-letter effect.
    Jordan TR; Patching GR
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(11):1504-14. PubMed ID: 15246288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.