478 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18817861)
1. Neural tonotopy in cochlear implants: an evaluation in unilateral cochlear implant patients with unilateral deafness and tinnitus.
Vermeire K; Nobbe A; Schleich P; Nopp P; Voormolen MH; Van de Heyning PH
Hear Res; 2008 Nov; 245(1-2):98-106. PubMed ID: 18817861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electric-acoustic pitch comparisons in single-sided-deaf cochlear implant users: frequency-place functions and rate pitch.
Schatzer R; Vermeire K; Visser D; Krenmayr A; Kals M; Voormolen M; Van de Heyning P; Zierhofer C
Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():26-35. PubMed ID: 24252455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Acoustic to electric pitch comparisons in cochlear implant subjects with residual hearing.
Boëx C; Baud L; Cosendai G; Sigrist A; Kós MI; Pelizzone M
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 7(2):110-24. PubMed ID: 16450213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pitch matching psychometrics in electric acoustic stimulation.
Baumann U; Rader T; Helbig S; Bahmer A
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):656-62. PubMed ID: 21869623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Non-penetrating round window electrode stimulation for tinnitus therapy followed by cochlear implantation.
Wenzel GI; Sarnes P; Warnecke A; Stöver T; Jäger B; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Nov; 272(11):3283-93. PubMed ID: 25480476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Place dependent stimulation rates improve pitch perception in cochlear implantees with single-sided deafness.
Rader T; Döge J; Adel Y; Weissgerber T; Baumann U
Hear Res; 2016 Sep; 339():94-103. PubMed ID: 27374479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pitch and loudness matching of unmodulated and modulated stimuli in cochlear implantees.
Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 302():32-49. PubMed ID: 23685148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perceptual changes with monopolar and phantom electrode stimulation.
Klawitter S; Landsberger DM; Büchner A; Nogueira W
Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 359():64-75. PubMed ID: 29325874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pitch Matching between Electrical Stimulation of a Cochlear Implant and Acoustic Stimuli Presented to a Contralateral Ear with Residual Hearing.
Tan CT; Martin B; Svirsky MA
J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Mar; 28(3):187-199. PubMed ID: 28277210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pure-Tone Masking Patterns for Monopolar and Phantom Electrical Stimulation in Cochlear Implants.
Saoji AA; Koka K; Litvak LM; Finley CC
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):124-130. PubMed ID: 28700446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Investigations on the tonotopy for patients with a cochlear implant and a hearing aid.
Niewiarowicz M; Stieler O
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2005; 126(2):75-80. PubMed ID: 16180345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The cochlear implant electrode-pitch function.
Baumann U; Nobbe A
Hear Res; 2006 Mar; 213(1-2):34-42. PubMed ID: 16442249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On the necessity of full length electrical cochlear stimulation to suppress severe tinnitus in single-sided deafness.
Punte AK; De Ridder D; Van de Heyning P
Hear Res; 2013 Jan; 295():24-9. PubMed ID: 23418635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Abnormal pitch perception produced by cochlear implant stimulation.
Zeng FG; Tang Q; Lu T
PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e88662. PubMed ID: 24551131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. CT-derived estimation of cochlear morphology and electrode array position in relation to word recognition in Nucleus-22 recipients.
Skinner MW; Ketten DR; Holden LK; Harding GW; Smith PG; Gates GA; Neely JG; Kletzker GR; Brunsden B; Blocker B
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2002 Sep; 3(3):332-50. PubMed ID: 12382107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electrophysiological spread of excitation and pitch perception for dual and single electrodes using the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant.
Busby PA; Battmer RD; Pesch J
Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):853-64. PubMed ID: 18633324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Electro-acoustic stimulation. Acoustic and electric pitch comparisons.
McDermott H; Sucher C; Simpson A
Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():2-7. PubMed ID: 19390169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Electro-acoustic pitch matching experiments in patients with single-sided deafness and a cochlear implant: Is there a need for adjustment of the default frequency allocation tables?
Peters JPM; Bennink E; Grolman W; van Zanten GA
Hear Res; 2016 Dec; 342():124-133. PubMed ID: 27789255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Implications of deep electrode insertion on cochlear implant fitting.
Gani M; Valentini G; Sigrist A; Kós MI; Boëx C
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2007 Mar; 8(1):69-83. PubMed ID: 17216585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. New parallel stimulation strategies revisited: effect of synchronous multi electrode stimulation on rate discrimination in cochlear implant users.
Bahmer A; Baumann U
Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Jun; 14(3):142-9. PubMed ID: 22733121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
