BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

320 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18818037)

  • 1. How to optimize breast ultrasound.
    Athanasiou A; Tardivon A; Ollivier L; Thibault F; El Khoury C; Neuenschwander S
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jan; 69(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 18818037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computer-aided detection/diagnosis of breast cancer in mammography and ultrasound: a review.
    Jalalian A; Mashohor SB; Mahmud HR; Saripan MI; Ramli AR; Karasfi B
    Clin Imaging; 2013; 37(3):420-6. PubMed ID: 23153689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bimodal Multiparameter-Based Approach for Benign-Malignant Classification of Breast Tumors.
    Ara SR; Alam F; Rahman MH; Akhter S; Awwal R; Hasan K
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Jul; 41(7):2022-38. PubMed ID: 25913281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Breast elasticity: principles, technique, results: an update and overview of commercially available software.
    Balleyguier C; Canale S; Ben Hassen W; Vielh P; Bayou EH; Mathieu MC; Uzan C; Bourgier C; Dromain C
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Mar; 82(3):427-34. PubMed ID: 22445593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ultrasound Strain Elastography for Breast Lesions: Computer-Aided Evaluation With Quantifiable Elastographic Features.
    Xiao Y; Zeng J; Zhang X; Niu LL; Qian M; Wang CZ; Zheng HR; Zheng RQ
    J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Jun; 36(6):1089-1100. PubMed ID: 28295467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of eighty-one cases with breast lesions using automated breast volume scanner and comparison with handheld ultrasound.
    Lin X; Wang J; Han F; Fu J; Li A
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 May; 81(5):873-8. PubMed ID: 21420814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Whole Breast Ultrasound: Comparison of the Visibility of Suspicious Lesions with Automated Breast Volumetric Scanning Versus Hand-Held Breast Ultrasound.
    Kuzmiak CM; Ko EY; Tuttle LA; Steed D; Zeng D; Yoon SC
    Acad Radiol; 2015 Jul; 22(7):870-9. PubMed ID: 25872862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combined Use of Ultrasound Elastography and B-Mode Sonography for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Circumscribed Breast Masses.
    Kim SY; Park JS; Koo HR
    J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Nov; 34(11):1951-9. PubMed ID: 26384609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: a comparison between automatically generated breast volume scans and handheld ultrasound examinations.
    Wang HY; Jiang YX; Zhu QL; Zhang J; Dai Q; Liu H; Lai XJ; Sun Q
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3190-200. PubMed ID: 22386134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. CAD in questions/answers Review of the literature.
    Boyer B; Balleyguier C; Granat O; Pharaboz C
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jan; 69(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 18977103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computer-aided diagnosis with textural features for breast lesions in sonograms.
    Chen DR; Huang YL; Lin SH
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2011 Apr; 35(3):220-6. PubMed ID: 21131178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [3D ultrasound (3D US) in the diagnosis of focal breast lesions].
    Kotsianos D; Wirth S; Fischer T; Hiltawsky K; Sittek H; Reiser M
    Radiologe; 2005 Mar; 45(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 15747149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speckle reduction approach for breast ultrasound image and its application to breast cancer diagnosis.
    Su Y; Wang H; Wang Y; Guo Y; Cheng H; Zhang Y; Tian J
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jul; 75(1):e136-41. PubMed ID: 19913380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Breast Cancer Ultrasound Images' Sequence Exploration Using BI-RADS Features' Extraction: Towards an Advanced Clinical Aided Tool for Precise Lesion Characterization.
    Sellami L; Ben Sassi O; Chtourou K; Ben Hamida A
    IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2015 Oct; 14(7):740-5. PubMed ID: 26513796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Malignant and benign breast masses on 3D US volumetric images: effect of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologist accuracy.
    Sahiner B; Chan HP; Roubidoux MA; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA; Paramagul C; Bailey J; Nees AV; Blane C
    Radiology; 2007 Mar; 242(3):716-24. PubMed ID: 17244717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimization of Region of Interest Drawing for Quantitative Analysis: Differentiation Between Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions on Contrast-Enhanced Sonography.
    Nakata N; Ohta T; Nishioka M; Takeyama H; Toriumi Y; Kato K; Nogi H; Kamio M; Fukuda K
    J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Nov; 34(11):1969-76. PubMed ID: 26384607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New potential and applications of contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the breast: Own investigations and review of the literature.
    Balleyguier C; Opolon P; Mathieu MC; Athanasiou A; Garbay JR; Delaloge S; Dromain C
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jan; 69(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 18977102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative study of automated breast 3-D ultrasound and handheld B-mode ultrasound for differentiation of benign and malignant breast masses.
    Chen L; Chen Y; Diao XH; Fang L; Pang Y; Cheng AQ; Li WP; Wang Y
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1735-42. PubMed ID: 23849390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Static and dynamic cumulative maximum intensity display mode for subharmonic breast imaging: a comparative study with mammographic and conventional ultrasound techniques.
    Dave JK; Forsberg F; Fernandes S; Piccoli CW; Fox TB; Merton DA; Leodore LM; Hall AL
    J Ultrasound Med; 2010 Aug; 29(8):1177-85. PubMed ID: 20660451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Breast Elastography: How We Do It.
    Gkali CA; Chalazonitis AN; Feida E; Sotiropoulou M; Giannos A; Tsigginou A; Dimitrakakis C
    Ultrasound Q; 2015 Dec; 31(4):255-61. PubMed ID: 26327432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.