These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18818529)

  • 1. The beneficial role of a judicial process when "everything" is too much?
    Handelman M; Parke B
    Healthc Q; 2008; 11(4):46-50. PubMed ID: 18818529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Best interests at end of life: an updated review of decisions made by the Consent and Capacity Board of Ontario.
    Chidwick P; Sibbald R; Hawryluck L
    J Crit Care; 2013 Feb; 28(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 23228726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The standard of care and conflicts at the end of life in critical care: lessons from medical-legal crossroads and the role of a quasi-judicial tribunal in decision-making.
    Hawryluck L; Sibbald R; Chidwick P
    J Crit Care; 2013 Dec; 28(6):1055-61. PubMed ID: 23891135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Physician perspectives on legal processes for resolving end-of-life disputes.
    Chidwick P; Sibbald R
    Healthc Q; 2011; 14(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 21841397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Best interests at end of life: a review of decisions made by the Consent and Capacity Board of Ontario.
    Sibbald RW; Chidwick P
    J Crit Care; 2010 Mar; 25(1):171.e1-7. PubMed ID: 19781897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Experience of Surrogate Decision Makers on Being Approached for Consent for Patient Participation in Research. A Multicenter Study.
    Burns KE; Prats CJ; Maione M; Lanceta M; Zubrinich C; Jeffs L; Smith OM;
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2017 Feb; 14(2):238-245. PubMed ID: 27849142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. "Everything has been tried and his heart can't recover…": A Descriptive Review of "Do Everything!" in the Archive of Ontario Consent and Capacity Board.
    Yim H; Hashmi SS; Dewar B; Dyason C; Kyeremanteng K; Lamb S; Shamy M
    BMC Med Ethics; 2022 Jun; 23(1):66. PubMed ID: 35761229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. End-of-life decision-making is difficult (problems with the Consent and Capacity Board).
    Sibbald R
    Can J Anaesth; 2018 Oct; 65(10):1161-1162. PubMed ID: 29980999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment in a patient's best interests: Australian judicial deliberations.
    Willmott L; White B; Smith MK; Wilkinson DJ
    Med J Aust; 2014 Nov; 201(9):545-7. PubMed ID: 25358584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Decisionmaking at the end of life: patients with Alzheimer's or other dementias.
    Francis LP
    Georgia Law Rev; 2001; 35(2):539-92. PubMed ID: 15119319
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reconciling Quinlan and Saikewicz: decision making for the terminally ill incompetent.
    Annas GJ
    Am J Law Med; 1979; 4(4):367-96. PubMed ID: 507056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The future of decision-making in critical care after Cuthbertson v. Rasouli.
    Hawryluck L; Baker AJ; Faith A; Singh JM
    Can J Anaesth; 2014 Oct; 61(10):951-8. PubMed ID: 25164242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Holding the line on euthanasia.
    Wolf SM
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(1):S13-5. PubMed ID: 11650119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Medical team's struggle with financial abuse in the corresponding -Limitation of the adult guardianship system: A case report].
    Ohno N; Mizuno Y; Kanbara A
    Nihon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi; 2018; 55(4):663-667. PubMed ID: 30542033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Commentary on "the standard of care and conflicts at the end of life: a review of decisions by the Ontario Consent and Capacity Board".
    Crippen D
    J Crit Care; 2013 Dec; 28(6):1105. PubMed ID: 24011974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Decisions to limit life-sustaining treatment for critically ill patients who lack both decision-making capacity and surrogate decision-makers.
    White DB; Curtis JR; Lo B; Luce JM
    Crit Care Med; 2006 Aug; 34(8):2053-9. PubMed ID: 16763515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Communicating with surrogate decision-makers in end-of-life situations: substitutive descriptive language for the healthcare provider.
    Limerick M
    Am J Hosp Palliat Care; 2002; 19(6):376-80. PubMed ID: 12442971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Criminal law--homicide--removal of intravenous feeding line from vegetative, comatose patient at family's request is not murder. Barber v. Superior Court, 147 Cal. App. 3d 1006, 195 Cal. Rptr. 484 (1983).
    Crook RR
    Cumberland Law Rev; 1984-1985; 15(1):225-37. PubMed ID: 11652439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Autonomy at the end of life: life-prolonging treatment in nursing homes--relatives' role in the decision-making process.
    Dreyer A; Forde R; Nortvedt P
    J Med Ethics; 2009 Nov; 35(11):672-7. PubMed ID: 19880703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Non-treatment in the best interests of the child: a case commentary of Couture-Jacquet v. Montreal Children's Hospital.
    Keyserlingk EW
    McGill Law J; 1987 Mar; 32(2):413-36. PubMed ID: 11649873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.