BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18819791)

  • 1. How to interpret the relative survival ratios of cancer patients.
    Pokhrel A; Hakulinen T
    Eur J Cancer; 2008 Nov; 44(17):2661-7. PubMed ID: 18819791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Greenwood formula for standard error of the age-standardised relative survival ratio.
    Pokhrel A; Dyba T; Hakulinen T
    Eur J Cancer; 2008 Feb; 44(3):441-7. PubMed ID: 18053707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Age-standardisation of relative survival ratios of cancer patients in a comparison between countries, genders and time periods.
    Pokhrel A; Hakulinen T
    Eur J Cancer; 2009 Mar; 45(4):642-7. PubMed ID: 19081246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trends in the survival of patients diagnosed with cancer in the Nordic countries 1964-2003 followed up to the end of 2006. Material and methods.
    Engholm G; Gislum M; Bray F; Hakulinen T
    Acta Oncol; 2010 Jun; 49(5):545-60. PubMed ID: 20491523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Choosing the relative survival method for cancer survival estimation.
    Hakulinen T; Seppä K; Lambert PC
    Eur J Cancer; 2011 Sep; 47(14):2202-10. PubMed ID: 21549589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Survival chances of Hungarian cancer patients in the National Cancer Registry].
    Tusnády G; Gaudi I; Rejto L; Kásler M; Szentirmay Z
    Magy Onkol; 2008 Dec; 52(4):339-49. PubMed ID: 19068461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Substantial overestimation of standard errors of relative survival rates of cancer patients.
    Brenner H; Hakulinen T
    Am J Epidemiol; 2005 Apr; 161(8):781-6. PubMed ID: 15800271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cancer survival analysis in Hamburg 1995-2003: assessing the data quality within a population-based registry.
    Nennecke AL; Hentschel S; Reintjes R
    Acta Oncol; 2009; 48(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 18607873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reduction in selective under-ascertainment bias in population-based estimates of cancer patient survival by age adjustment.
    Brenner H; Hakulinen T
    Eur J Cancer; 2005 Aug; 41(12):1788-93. PubMed ID: 16043349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating expected survival probabilities for relative survival analysis--exploring the impact of including cancer patient mortality in the calculations.
    Talbäck M; Dickman PW
    Eur J Cancer; 2011 Nov; 47(17):2626-32. PubMed ID: 21924892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Up-to-date and precise estimates of cancer patient survival: model-based period analysis.
    Brenner H; Hakulinen T
    Am J Epidemiol; 2006 Oct; 164(7):689-96. PubMed ID: 16840519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cancer incidence among persons with fragile X syndrome in Finland: a population-based study.
    Sund R; Pukkala E; Patja K
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2009 Jan; 53(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 18705633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of methods for calculating relative survival in population-based studies.
    Rutherford MJ; Dickman PW; Lambert PC
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2012 Feb; 36(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 21840284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of period analysis for providing more up-to-date estimates of long-term survival rates: empirical evaluation among 370,000 cancer patients in Finland.
    Brenner H; Söderman B; Hakulinen T
    Int J Epidemiol; 2002 Apr; 31(2):456-62. PubMed ID: 11980816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An alternative approach to age adjustment of cancer survival rates.
    Brenner H; Arndt V; Gefeller O; Hakulinen T
    Eur J Cancer; 2004 Oct; 40(15):2317-22. PubMed ID: 15454258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adjusting for the proportion of cancer deaths in the general population when using relative survival: a sensitivity analysis.
    Hinchliffe SR; Dickman PW; Lambert PC
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2012 Apr; 36(2):148-52. PubMed ID: 22000329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An empirical evaluation of period survival analysis using data from the Canadian Cancer Registry.
    Ellison LF
    Ann Epidemiol; 2006 Mar; 16(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 16099673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lifelong cancer incidence in 47,697 patients treated for childhood cancer in the Nordic countries.
    Olsen JH; Möller T; Anderson H; Langmark F; Sankila R; Tryggvadóttír L; Winther JF; Rechnitzer C; Jonmundsson G; Christensen J; Garwicz S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Jun; 101(11):806-13. PubMed ID: 19470947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conditional relative survival of cancer patients and conditional probability of death: a French National Database analysis.
    Bouvier AM; Remontet L; Hédelin G; Launoy G; Jooste V; Grosclaude P; Belot A; Lacour B; Estève J; Bossard N; Faivre J;
    Cancer; 2009 Oct; 115(19):4616-24. PubMed ID: 19569252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term survival expectations of cancer patients in Europe in 2000-2002.
    Brenner H; Francisci S; de Angelis R; Marcos-Gragera R; Verdecchia A; Gatta G; Allemani C; Ciccolallo L; Coleman M; Sant M;
    Eur J Cancer; 2009 Apr; 45(6):1028-41. PubMed ID: 19091549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.