These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18819791)

  • 1. How to interpret the relative survival ratios of cancer patients.
    Pokhrel A; Hakulinen T
    Eur J Cancer; 2008 Nov; 44(17):2661-7. PubMed ID: 18819791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Greenwood formula for standard error of the age-standardised relative survival ratio.
    Pokhrel A; Dyba T; Hakulinen T
    Eur J Cancer; 2008 Feb; 44(3):441-7. PubMed ID: 18053707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Age-standardisation of relative survival ratios of cancer patients in a comparison between countries, genders and time periods.
    Pokhrel A; Hakulinen T
    Eur J Cancer; 2009 Mar; 45(4):642-7. PubMed ID: 19081246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trends in the survival of patients diagnosed with cancer in the Nordic countries 1964-2003 followed up to the end of 2006. Material and methods.
    Engholm G; Gislum M; Bray F; Hakulinen T
    Acta Oncol; 2010 Jun; 49(5):545-60. PubMed ID: 20491523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Choosing the relative survival method for cancer survival estimation.
    Hakulinen T; Seppä K; Lambert PC
    Eur J Cancer; 2011 Sep; 47(14):2202-10. PubMed ID: 21549589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Survival chances of Hungarian cancer patients in the National Cancer Registry].
    Tusnády G; Gaudi I; Rejto L; Kásler M; Szentirmay Z
    Magy Onkol; 2008 Dec; 52(4):339-49. PubMed ID: 19068461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Substantial overestimation of standard errors of relative survival rates of cancer patients.
    Brenner H; Hakulinen T
    Am J Epidemiol; 2005 Apr; 161(8):781-6. PubMed ID: 15800271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cancer survival analysis in Hamburg 1995-2003: assessing the data quality within a population-based registry.
    Nennecke AL; Hentschel S; Reintjes R
    Acta Oncol; 2009; 48(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 18607873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reduction in selective under-ascertainment bias in population-based estimates of cancer patient survival by age adjustment.
    Brenner H; Hakulinen T
    Eur J Cancer; 2005 Aug; 41(12):1788-93. PubMed ID: 16043349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating expected survival probabilities for relative survival analysis--exploring the impact of including cancer patient mortality in the calculations.
    Talbäck M; Dickman PW
    Eur J Cancer; 2011 Nov; 47(17):2626-32. PubMed ID: 21924892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Up-to-date and precise estimates of cancer patient survival: model-based period analysis.
    Brenner H; Hakulinen T
    Am J Epidemiol; 2006 Oct; 164(7):689-96. PubMed ID: 16840519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cancer incidence among persons with fragile X syndrome in Finland: a population-based study.
    Sund R; Pukkala E; Patja K
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2009 Jan; 53(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 18705633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of methods for calculating relative survival in population-based studies.
    Rutherford MJ; Dickman PW; Lambert PC
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2012 Feb; 36(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 21840284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of period analysis for providing more up-to-date estimates of long-term survival rates: empirical evaluation among 370,000 cancer patients in Finland.
    Brenner H; Söderman B; Hakulinen T
    Int J Epidemiol; 2002 Apr; 31(2):456-62. PubMed ID: 11980816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An alternative approach to age adjustment of cancer survival rates.
    Brenner H; Arndt V; Gefeller O; Hakulinen T
    Eur J Cancer; 2004 Oct; 40(15):2317-22. PubMed ID: 15454258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adjusting for the proportion of cancer deaths in the general population when using relative survival: a sensitivity analysis.
    Hinchliffe SR; Dickman PW; Lambert PC
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2012 Apr; 36(2):148-52. PubMed ID: 22000329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An empirical evaluation of period survival analysis using data from the Canadian Cancer Registry.
    Ellison LF
    Ann Epidemiol; 2006 Mar; 16(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 16099673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lifelong cancer incidence in 47,697 patients treated for childhood cancer in the Nordic countries.
    Olsen JH; Möller T; Anderson H; Langmark F; Sankila R; Tryggvadóttír L; Winther JF; Rechnitzer C; Jonmundsson G; Christensen J; Garwicz S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Jun; 101(11):806-13. PubMed ID: 19470947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conditional relative survival of cancer patients and conditional probability of death: a French National Database analysis.
    Bouvier AM; Remontet L; Hédelin G; Launoy G; Jooste V; Grosclaude P; Belot A; Lacour B; Estève J; Bossard N; Faivre J;
    Cancer; 2009 Oct; 115(19):4616-24. PubMed ID: 19569252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term survival expectations of cancer patients in Europe in 2000-2002.
    Brenner H; Francisci S; de Angelis R; Marcos-Gragera R; Verdecchia A; Gatta G; Allemani C; Ciccolallo L; Coleman M; Sant M;
    Eur J Cancer; 2009 Apr; 45(6):1028-41. PubMed ID: 19091549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.