525 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18820306)
1. Treatment effects of intraoral appliances with conventional anchorage designs for non-compliance maxillary molar distalization: a literature review.
Kinzinger GS; Eren M; Diedrich PR
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):558-71. PubMed ID: 18820306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Molar distalization with pendulum appliances in the mixed dentition: effects on the position of unerupted canines and premolars.
Kinzinger GS; Wehrbein H; Gross U; Diedrich PR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Mar; 129(3):407-17. PubMed ID: 16527638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficiency of the skeletonized Pendulum K appliance for non-compliance maxillary molar distalization : A clinical pilot study.
Kinzinger GSM; Hourfar J; Lisson JA
J Orofac Orthop; 2021 Nov; 82(6):391-402. PubMed ID: 33651171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficiency of a skeletonized distal jet appliance supported by miniscrew anchorage for noncompliance maxillary molar distalization.
Kinzinger GS; Gülden N; Yildizhan F; Diedrich PR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Oct; 136(4):578-86. PubMed ID: 19815162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Maxillary molar distalization with noncompliance intramaxillary appliances in Class II malocclusion. A systematic review.
Antonarakis GS; Kiliaridis S
Angle Orthod; 2008 Nov; 78(6):1133-40. PubMed ID: 18947282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A new approach in maxillary molar distalization: intraoral bodily molar distalizer.
Keles A; Sayinsu K
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jan; 117(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 10629518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Osseointegrated implants with pendulum springs for maxillary molar distalization: a cephalometric study.
Onçağ G; Seçkin O; Dinçer B; Arikan F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):16-26. PubMed ID: 17208102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of two intraoral molar distalization appliances: distal jet versus pendulum.
Chiu PP; McNamara JA; Franchi L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Sep; 128(3):353-65. PubMed ID: 16168332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of unilateral molar distalization with a modified pendulum appliance.
Schütze SF; Gedrange T; Zellmann MR; Harzer W
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 May; 131(5):600-8. PubMed ID: 17482078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effectiveness of pendulum, K-loop, and distal jet distalization techniques in growing children and its effects on anchor unit: A comparative study.
Marure PS; Patil RU; Reddy S; Prakash A; Kshetrimayum N; Shukla R
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 27681396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sagittal, vertical, and transverse changes consequent to maxillary molar distalization with the pendulum appliance.
Fuziy A; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Janson G; Angelieri F; Pinzan A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Oct; 130(4):502-10. PubMed ID: 17045150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Maxillary molar distalization with a bone-anchored pendulum appliance.
Kircelli BH; Pektaş ZO; Kircelli C
Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):650-9. PubMed ID: 16808573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anchorage quality of deciduous molars versus premolars for molar distalization with a pendulum appliance.
Kinzinger GS; Gross U; Fritz UB; Diedrich PR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Mar; 127(3):314-23. PubMed ID: 15775946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intraoral maxillary molar distalization.
Karlsson I; Bondemark L
Angle Orthod; 2006 Nov; 76(6):923-9. PubMed ID: 17090171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of maxillary molar distalization with the distal jet: a comparison with other contemporary methods.
Bolla E; Muratore F; Carano A; Bowman SJ
Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):481-94. PubMed ID: 12401059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cephalometric effects of the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion treatment.
Patel MP; Henriques JF; Freitas KM; Grec RH
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(3):44-51. PubMed ID: 25162565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Noncompliance maxillary molar distalization with the first class appliance: a randomized controlled trial.
Papadopoulos MA; Melkos AB; Athanasiou AE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):586.e1-586.e13; discussion 586-7. PubMed ID: 20451774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of two maxillary molar distalizing appliances with the distal jet.
Ferguson DJ; Carano A; Bowman SJ; Davis EC; Gutierrez Vega ME; Lee SH
World J Orthod; 2005; 6(4):382-90. PubMed ID: 16379210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of an intraoral maxillary molar distalization technique.
Ghosh J; Nanda RS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Dec; 110(6):639-46. PubMed ID: 8972811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
