161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18820491)
1. Setting standards for performance tests: a pilot study of a three-level Angoff method.
Yudkowsky R; Downing SM; Popescu M
Acad Med; 2008 Oct; 83(10 Suppl):S13-6. PubMed ID: 18820491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is an Angoff standard an indication of minimal competence of examinees or of judges?
Verheggen MM; Muijtjens AM; Van Os J; Schuwirth LW
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 May; 13(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 17043915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of judge selection on standard setting for a patient survey of physician communication skills.
Wayne DB; Cohen E; Makoul G; McGaghie WC
Acad Med; 2008 Oct; 83(10 Suppl):S17-20. PubMed ID: 18820492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Do baseline data influence standard setting for a clinical skills examination?
Wayne DB; Barsuk JH; Cohen E; McGaghie WC
Acad Med; 2007 Oct; 82(10 Suppl):S105-8. PubMed ID: 17895672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Who will pass the dental OSCE? Comparison of the Angoff and the borderline regression standard setting methods.
Schoonheim-Klein M; Muijtjens A; Habets L; Manogue M; van der Vleuten C; van der Velden U
Eur J Dent Educ; 2009 Aug; 13(3):162-71. PubMed ID: 19630935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Setting defensible standards for cardiac auscultation skills in medical students.
Wayne DB; Butter J; Cohen ER; McGaghie WC
Acad Med; 2009 Oct; 84(10 Suppl):S94-6. PubMed ID: 19907398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A model for setting performance standards for standardized patient examinations.
Talente G; Haist SA; Wilson JF
Eval Health Prof; 2003 Dec; 26(4):427-46. PubMed ID: 14631613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ensuring global standards for medical graduates: a pilot study of international standard-setting.
Stern DT; Ben-David MF; De Champlain A; Hodges B; Wojtczak A; Schwarz MR
Med Teach; 2005 May; 27(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 16011943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Setting school-level outcome standards.
Stern DT; Friedman Ben-David M; Norcini J; Wojtczak A; Schwarz MR
Med Educ; 2006 Feb; 40(2):166-72. PubMed ID: 16451245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simulation-based examinations in physician assistant education: A comparison of two standard-setting methods.
Carlson J; Tomkowiak J; Knott P
J Physician Assist Educ; 2010; 21(2):7-14. PubMed ID: 21141047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rater errors in a clinical skills assessment of medical students.
Iramaneerat C; Yudkowsky R
Eval Health Prof; 2007 Sep; 30(3):266-83. PubMed ID: 17693619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Standard setting: comparison of two methods.
George S; Haque MS; Oyebode F
BMC Med Educ; 2006 Sep; 6():46. PubMed ID: 16972990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How to set the bar in competency-based medical education: standard setting after an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE).
Dwyer T; Wright S; Kulasegaram KM; Theodoropoulos J; Chahal J; Wasserstein D; Ringsted C; Hodges B; Ogilvie-Harris D
BMC Med Educ; 2016 Jan; 16():1. PubMed ID: 26727954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Standard setting with dichotomous and constructed response items: some Rasch model approaches.
MacCann RG
J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(4):438-54. PubMed ID: 19934530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patient-centered interviewing and student performance in a comprehensive clinical skills examination: is there an association?
Rouf E; Chumley H; Dobbie A
Patient Educ Couns; 2009 Apr; 75(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 19013743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Insights into the Angoff method: results from a simulation study.
Shulruf B; Wilkinson T; Weller J; Jones P; Poole P
BMC Med Educ; 2016 May; 16():134. PubMed ID: 27142788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Judges' perception of candidates' organization and communication, in relation to oral certification examination ratings.
Houston JE; Myford CM
Acad Med; 2009 Nov; 84(11):1603-9. PubMed ID: 19858824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differences in expectations of passing standards in communication skills for pre-clinical and clinical medical students.
Park YS; Kamin C; Son D; Kim G; Yudkowsky R
Patient Educ Couns; 2019 Feb; 102(2):301-308. PubMed ID: 30245099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Panel expertise for an Angoff standard setting procedure in progress testing: item writers compared to recently graduated students.
Verhoeven BH; Verwijnen GM; Muijtjens AM; Scherpbier AJ; van der Vleuten CP
Med Educ; 2002 Sep; 36(9):860-7. PubMed ID: 12354249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinically discriminating checklists versus thoroughness checklists: improving the validity of performance test scores.
Yudkowsky R; Park YS; Riddle J; Palladino C; Bordage G
Acad Med; 2014 Jul; 89(7):1057-62. PubMed ID: 24685660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
