BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

428 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18820514)

  • 1. Does the consistent application of criteria for faculty promotion lead to fair decisions?
    Kanter SL
    Acad Med; 2008 Oct; 83(10):891-2. PubMed ID: 18820514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The Professorial Promotions Committee of the Faculty of Medicine of Johns Hopkins: a letter of experience].
    McHugh PR
    Med Clin (Barc); 1994 Feb; 102(7):259-66. PubMed ID: 8170214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development of an evidence-based application and rubric for evaluating applicants' qualifications for promotion to professor.
    Wiese GC; Percuoco RE; Pickar JG; Duray SM; Faruqui SR; Schmiedel GO; McLean ID
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2007 Sep; 30(7):527-35. PubMed ID: 17870422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The value of reference checks.
    Nowicki M
    J Healthc Resour Manag; 1996 Dec; 14(10):32. PubMed ID: 10163206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reviewing performance appraisal policies can lead to improved worker health.
    Rosen RH
    Bus Health; 1984 Sep; 1(9):54. PubMed ID: 10267658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Alternative pathways to promotion needed.
    Baldor RA
    Fam Med; 1997 Mar; 29(3):158-9. PubMed ID: 9085092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Creating job descriptions and a job applicant wish list.
    Hills LS
    J Med Pract Manage; 2003; 18(5):275-7. PubMed ID: 12733488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The formulations of a work reference are similar to a secret code. Our specialty author decrypts the most important sentences: between the lines lies the truth].
    Gamm S
    Pflege Z; 2012 Jan; 65(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 22338261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Answering the question of the year with faculty diversity.
    McDougle L; Lu FG; Castro IL
    Acad Med; 2011 Nov; 86(11):1344. PubMed ID: 22030643
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Academic internal medicine: challenges and opportunities--Part I.
    Am J Med; 2000 Apr; 108(6):525-9. PubMed ID: 10866595
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance audit in the selection and management of personnel in the physician's office laboratory.
    Crowley JR; Tillman M
    Prim Care; 1986 Dec; 13(4):617-31. PubMed ID: 3642611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Organizational climate and family life: how these factors affect the status of women faculty at one medical school.
    Shollen SL; Bland CJ; Finstad DA; Taylor AL
    Acad Med; 2009 Jan; 84(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 19116483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The role of the faculty in the organization and control of medical research].
    Kazakov VN; Barinov EF; Siniachenko OV; Abramets II
    Sov Med; 1990; (10):67-9. PubMed ID: 2293392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bibliometrics: a potential decision making aid in hiring, reappointment, tenure and promotion decisions.
    Holden G; Rosenberg G; Barker K
    Soc Work Health Care; 2005; 41(3-4):67-92. PubMed ID: 16236639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What every personnel director should know about management promotion decisions.
    London M
    Pers J; 1978 Oct; 57(10):550-5. PubMed ID: 10238551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. First-time department chairs at U.S. medical schools: a 29-year perspective on recruitment and retention.
    Rayburn WF; Alexander H; Lang J; Scott JL
    Acad Med; 2009 Oct; 84(10):1336-41. PubMed ID: 19881417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A study of the relational aspects of the culture of academic medicine.
    Pololi L; Conrad P; Knight S; Carr P
    Acad Med; 2009 Jan; 84(1):106-14. PubMed ID: 19116486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Should decisions about your hiring, reappointment, tenure, or promotion use the impact factor score as a proxy indicator of the impact of your scholarship?
    Holden G; Rosenberg G; Barker K; Onghena P
    MedGenMed; 2006 Jul; 8(3):21. PubMed ID: 17406161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The performance appraisal process.
    Moss GL
    Optometry; 2000 Dec; 71(12):796-9. PubMed ID: 11145305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Characteristics of the sophisticated job candidate.
    Lyons MF
    Physician Exec; 2004; 30(3):65-6. PubMed ID: 15179896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.