These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. A seven-year clinical evaluation of soft-tissue effects of hydroxylapatite-coated vs. uncoated subperiosteal implants. Fettig RH; Kay JF J Oral Implantol; 1994; 20(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 7932855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The subperiosteal implant as a viable long-term treatment modality in the severely atrophied mandible: a patient's 40-year case history. Kurtzman GM; Schwartz K J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 7473869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A 41-year history of a mandibular subperiosteal implant. Schou S; Pallesen L; Hjørting-Hansen E; Pedersen CS; Fibaek B Clin Oral Implants Res; 2000 Apr; 11(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 11168208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Management of implant-related problems and infections. Linkow LI; Wagner JR J Oral Implantol; 1993; 19(4):321-35. PubMed ID: 8007026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A clinical technique revisited: treating the peri-implantoclasia of hydroxyapatite-coated subperiosteal implants. Nordquist WD; Jermyn AC J Oral Implantol; 1994; 20(4):322-5. PubMed ID: 7643442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of subperiosteal implants with a unique composite coating: a case report. McMillan MH; Sahay V; Hahn H J Oral Implantol; 1993; 19(4):341-5. PubMed ID: 8007028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Suspension mechanism of subperiosteal implants in baboons. Whittaker JM; James RA; Lozada J; Cordova C; Freidline C J Oral Implantol; 1990; 16(3):190-7. PubMed ID: 2098562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [110th volume of Dutch Journal of Dentistry 4. Application of dental implants during the last five decades: from subperiosteal to transosteal and endosseous implants]. Raghoebar GM Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2003 Nov; 110(11):422-9. PubMed ID: 14669481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Subperiosteal implants provide another option for dentistry: one practitioner's experience. O'Roark WL MSDA J; 1996; 39(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 9569874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A newly designed partial subperiosteal implant and the classical design: a comparative study. Ferrer F P R Health Sci J; 1994 Sep; 13(3):183-90. PubMed ID: 7997500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Current evaluation of dental implants: a review of the literature. Nomura T; Shingaki S; Nakajima T J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 1998; 8(3-4):175-92. PubMed ID: 10186964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Case report: restorative maintenance of prostheses stabilised by non-endosseous implants. Morrow LA; Smith PW; McCord JF Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2000 Jun; 8(2):53-6. PubMed ID: 11307399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Morphologic studies on the biologic seal of titanium dental implants. Report II. In vivo study on the defending mechanism of epithelial adhesions/attachment against invasive factors. Kawahara H; Kawahara D; Mimura Y; Takashima Y; Ong JL Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(4):465-73. PubMed ID: 9714952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. From subperiosteal to osseointegration: an unusual demand met by an unusual approach. Ganz CH Dent Today; 1995 Oct; 14(10):48, 50-1. PubMed ID: 9540645 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]