These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18821108)

  • 21. Perceptual Judgments of Resonance, Nasal Airflow, Understandability, and Acceptability in Speakers With Cleft Palate: Ordinal Versus Visual Analogue Scaling.
    Castick S; Knight RA; Sell D
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2017 Jan; 54(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 28067575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Phonology in Swedish-speaking 3-year-olds born with cleft lip and palate and the relationship with consonant production at 18 months.
    Klintö K; Eva-Kristina-Salameh ; Olsson M; Flynn T; Svensson H; Lohmander A
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2014; 49(2):240-54. PubMed ID: 24180229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Issues in perceptual speech analysis in cleft palate and related disorders: a review.
    Sell D
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2005; 40(2):103-21. PubMed ID: 16101269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. South African speech-language therapists' opinion of their training in cleft lip and palate and craniofacial deformities.
    Ghabrial E; Bütow KW; Olorunju S
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 2020 Jul; 67(1):e1-e6. PubMed ID: 32787416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Cleft Care UK study. Part 4: perceptual speech outcomes.
    Sell D; Mildinhall S; Albery L; Wills AK; Sandy JR; Ness AR
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 Nov; 18 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):36-46. PubMed ID: 26567854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Speech outcome following treatment in cross-linguistic cleft palate studies: methodological implications.
    Hutters B; Henningsson G
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2004 Sep; 41(5):544-9. PubMed ID: 15352862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The influence of listener experience and academic training on ratings of nasality.
    Lewis KE; Watterson TL; Houghton SM
    J Commun Disord; 2003; 36(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 12493637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison between perceptual assessments of nasality and nasalance scores.
    Brunnegård K; Lohmander A; van Doorn J
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2012; 47(5):556-66. PubMed ID: 22938066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. SISL (ScreeningsInstrument Schisis Leuven): assessment of cleft palate speech, resonance and myofunction.
    Breuls M; Sell D; Manders E; Boulet E; Vander Poorten V
    B-ENT; 2006; 2 Suppl 4():71-84. PubMed ID: 17366851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Facilitating communication among speech pathologists treating children with cleft palate.
    Karnell MP; Bailey P; Johnson L; Dragan A; Canady JW
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2005 Nov; 42(6):585-8. PubMed ID: 16241168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparing Methodologies in a Series of Speech Outcome Studies : Challenges and Lessons Learned.
    Ahl R; Harding-Bell A
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2018 Jan; 55(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 34162055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Apraxia of speech: how reliable are speech and language therapists' diagnoses?
    Mumby K; Bowen A; Hesketh A
    Clin Rehabil; 2007 Aug; 21(8):760-7. PubMed ID: 17846076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cleft lip and palate research: an updated state of the art. Section VI. Speech and language aspects.
    Bradley DP
    Cleft Palate J; 1977 Oct; 14(4):321-8. PubMed ID: 332417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Speech analyses of four children with repaired cleft palates.
    Powers GR; Dunn C; Erickson CB
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1990 Aug; 55(3):542-9. PubMed ID: 2381195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Language acquisition in cleft lip-palate (CLP) children. 2. Linguistic diagnosis and therapeutic approaches].
    Herrmann W; Bitter K
    Dtsch Z Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 1990; 14(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 2102408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Using telerehabilitation to assess apraxia of speech in adults.
    Hill AJ; Theodoros D; Russell T; Ward E
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2009; 44(5):731-47. PubMed ID: 18821157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effects of listening conditions on speech rating obtained in a clinical setting.
    Moller KT; Starr CD
    Cleft Palate J; 1984 Apr; 21(2):65-9. PubMed ID: 6203670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Borg scale: a new method for hypernasality rating.
    Ramos-Favaretto FS; Fukushiro AP; Scarmagnani RH; Yamashita RP
    Codas; 2019; 31(6):e20180296. PubMed ID: 31800882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of the progress of therapy in patients with cleft lip, jaw and palate, using voice analysis--a pilot study.
    Gugsch C; Dannhauer KH; Fuchs M
    J Orofac Orthop; 2008 Jul; 69(4):257-67. PubMed ID: 18797830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Current training and continuing education needs of preschool and school-based speech-language pathologists regarding children with cleft lip/palate.
    Bedwinek AP; Kummer AW; Rice GB; Grames LM
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2010 Oct; 41(4):405-15. PubMed ID: 19901037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.