These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18821959)

  • 1. pH changes after manual or ultrasonic instrumentation and smear layer removal with EDTA or ultrasonic.
    Zampronio CF; Sivieri-Araújo G; Bonetti-Filho I; Berbert FL
    Dent Traumatol; 2008 Oct; 24(5):542-5. PubMed ID: 18821959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effectiveness of the EndoActivator System in removing the smear layer after root canal instrumentation.
    Uroz-Torres D; González-Rodríguez MP; Ferrer-Luque CM
    J Endod; 2010 Feb; 36(2):308-11. PubMed ID: 20113797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of EDTA with and without ultrasonics on removal of the smear layer.
    Kuah HG; Lui JN; Tseng PS; Chen NN
    J Endod; 2009 Mar; 35(3):393-6. PubMed ID: 19249602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of shortened irrigation times with 17% ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid on smear layer removal after rotary canal instrumentation.
    Saito K; Webb TD; Imamura GM; Goodell GG
    J Endod; 2008 Aug; 34(8):1011-4. PubMed ID: 18634937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Changes in pH at the dentin surface in roots obturated with calcium hydroxide pastes.
    Esberard RM; Carnes DL; del Rio CE
    J Endod; 1996 Aug; 22(8):402-5. PubMed ID: 8941747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of debris and smear layer remaining following use of ProTaper and Hero Shaper instruments in combination with NaOCl and EDTA irrigation.
    Yang G; Wu H; Zheng Y; Zhang H; Li H; Zhou X
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):e63-71. PubMed ID: 18701325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Scanning electron microscopic preliminary study of the efficacy of SmearClear and EDTA for smear layer removal after root canal instrumentation in permanent teeth.
    da Silva LA; Sanguino AC; Rocha CT; Leonardo MR; Silva RA
    J Endod; 2008 Dec; 34(12):1541-4. PubMed ID: 19026891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of root canal wall cleanliness after calcium hydroxide removal using three irrigation regimens.
    Naaman A; Kaloustian H; Ounsi HF; Naaman-Bou Abboud N; Ricci C; Medioni E
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jan; 8(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 17211500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effectiveness in cleaning oval-shaped root canals using Anatomic Endodontic Technology, ProFile and manual instrumentation: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Banegas G
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):356-63. PubMed ID: 15910470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Chitosan: a new solution for removal of smear layer after root canal instrumentation.
    Silva PV; Guedes DF; Nakadi FV; Pécora JD; Cruz-Filho AM
    Int Endod J; 2013 Apr; 46(4):332-8. PubMed ID: 22970844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of ethylenediaminetetraacetic, etidronic and peracetic acid irrigation on human root dentine and the smear layer.
    Lottanti S; Gautschi H; Sener B; Zehnder M
    Int Endod J; 2009 Apr; 42(4):335-43. PubMed ID: 19220516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [A comparative study of root smear layer removal using different pH EDTA salts].
    Ma R; Liu Z; Zhu CL
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2003 Jun; 12(3):197-9. PubMed ID: 14661329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of different irrigants on calcium hydroxide medication removal: microscopic cleanliness evaluation.
    Salgado RJ; Moura-Netto C; Yamazaki AK; Cardoso LN; de Moura AA; Prokopowitsch I
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Apr; 107(4):580-4. PubMed ID: 19201223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of different irrigation on smear layer removal after post space preparation.
    Gu XH; Mao CY; Kern M
    J Endod; 2009 Apr; 35(4):583-6. PubMed ID: 19345810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro evaluation of endodontic debris removal as obtained by rotary instrumentation coupled with ultrasonic irrigation.
    Passarinho-Neto JG; Marchesan MA; Ferreira RB; Silva RG; Silva-Sousa YT; Sousa-Neto MD
    Aust Endod J; 2006 Dec; 32(3):123-8. PubMed ID: 17201755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of EDTA with and without surfactants or ultrasonics on removal of smear layer.
    Lui JN; Kuah HG; Chen NN
    J Endod; 2007 Apr; 33(4):472-5. PubMed ID: 17368342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) solution and gel for smear layer removal.
    Dotto SR; Travassos RM; de Oliveira EP; Machado ME; Martins JL
    Aust Endod J; 2007 Aug; 33(2):62-5. PubMed ID: 17697246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The smear layer in endodontics - a review.
    Violich DR; Chandler NP
    Int Endod J; 2010 Jan; 43(1):2-15. PubMed ID: 20002799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficacy of the NaviTip FX irrigation needle in removing post instrumentation canal smear layer and debris in curved root canals.
    Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Serrano SA; Palo RM; Iglesias EF
    J Endod; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1270-3. PubMed ID: 19720229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term evaluation of the influence of smear layer on the apical sealing ability of MTA.
    Yildirim T; Oruçoğlu H; Cobankara FK
    J Endod; 2008 Dec; 34(12):1537-40. PubMed ID: 19026890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.