These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

536 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18822313)

  • 1. Models of response inhibition in the stop-signal and stop-change paradigms.
    Verbruggen F; Logan GD
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2009 May; 33(5):647-61. PubMed ID: 18822313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigating a race model account of executive control in rats with the countermanding paradigm.
    Beuk J; Beninger RJ; Paré M
    Neuroscience; 2014 Mar; 263():96-110. PubMed ID: 24440749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the ability to inhibit thought and action: general and special theories of an act of control.
    Logan GD; Van Zandt T; Verbruggen F; Wagenmakers EJ
    Psychol Rev; 2014 Jan; 121(1):66-95. PubMed ID: 24490789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual-tactile saccadic inhibition.
    Akerfelt A; Colonius H; Diederich A
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 169(4):554-63. PubMed ID: 16328301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inhibitory control in mind and brain 2.0: blocked-input models of saccadic countermanding.
    Logan GD; Yamaguchi M; Schall JD; Palmeri TJ
    Psychol Rev; 2015 Apr; 122(2):115-47. PubMed ID: 25706403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inhibitory control in mind and brain: an interactive race model of countermanding saccades.
    Boucher L; Palmeri TJ; Logan GD; Schall JD
    Psychol Rev; 2007 Apr; 114(2):376-97. PubMed ID: 17500631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A unified account of simple and response-selective inhibition.
    Gronau QF; Hinder MR; Salomoni SE; Matzke D; Heathcote A
    Cogn Psychol; 2024 Mar; 149():101628. PubMed ID: 38199181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stopping eyes and hands: evidence for non-independence of stop and go processes and for a separation of central and peripheral inhibition.
    Gulberti A; Arndt PA; Colonius H
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2014; 8():61. PubMed ID: 24600371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Paradox resolved: Stop signal race model with negative dependence.
    Colonius H; Diederich A
    Psychol Rev; 2018 Nov; 125(6):1051-1058. PubMed ID: 30272461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Models of inhibitory control.
    Schall JD; Palmeri TJ; Logan GD
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2017 Apr; 372(1718):. PubMed ID: 28242727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cognitive control and automatic interference in mind and brain: A unified model of saccadic inhibition and countermanding.
    Bompas A; Campbell AE; Sumner P
    Psychol Rev; 2020 Jul; 127(4):524-561. PubMed ID: 31999149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy of inhibitory control depends on procrastination and deceleration in saccade planning.
    Indrajeet I; Ray S
    Exp Brain Res; 2020 Oct; 238(10):2417-2432. PubMed ID: 32776172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Looking before you leap: a theory of motivated control of action.
    Liddle EB; Scerif G; Hollis CP; Batty MJ; Groom MJ; Liotti M; Liddle PF
    Cognition; 2009 Jul; 112(1):141-58. PubMed ID: 19409540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Countermanding saccades: evidence against independent processing of go and stop signals.
    Ozyurt J; Colonius H; Arndt PA
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Apr; 65(3):420-8. PubMed ID: 12785072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of history on saccade countermanding performance in humans and macaque monkeys.
    Emeric EE; Brown JW; Boucher L; Carpenter RH; Hanes DP; Harris R; Logan GD; Mashru RN; Paré M; Pouget P; Stuphorn V; Taylor TL; Schall JD
    Vision Res; 2007 Jan; 47(1):35-49. PubMed ID: 17081584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. To start or stop an action depends on which movement we perform: An appraisal of the horse-race model.
    Hervault M; Huys R; Buisson JC; Francheteau M; Siguier P; Zanone PG
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Jun; 217():103332. PubMed ID: 33991795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cancelling of pursuit and saccadic eye movements in humans and monkeys.
    Kornylo K; Dill N; Saenz M; Krauzlis RJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2003 Jun; 89(6):2984-99. PubMed ID: 12783947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pigeons' performance in a tracking change-signal procedure is consistent with the independent horse-race model.
    Lea SEG; Chow PKY; Meier C; McLaren IPL; Verbruggen F
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Oct; 45(4):464-473. PubMed ID: 31368768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stop-signal delay reflects response selection duration in stop-signal task.
    Aksiotis V; Myachykov A; Tumyalis A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Aug; 85(6):1976-1989. PubMed ID: 37415061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Countermanding eye-head gaze shifts in humans: marching orders are delivered to the head first.
    Corneil BD; Elsley JK
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Jul; 94(1):883-95. PubMed ID: 15728762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.