129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18822453)
1. The newer the better? Comparison of the 1997 and 2001 partin tables for pathologic stage prediction of prostate cancer in China.
Gao X; Ren S; Lu X; Xu C; Sun Y
Urology; 2008 Nov; 72(5):1096-101. PubMed ID: 18822453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of Partin tables for predicting pathological stage of clinically localized prostate cancer.
Blute ML; Bergstralh EJ; Partin AW; Walsh PC; Kattan MW; Scardino PT; Montie JE; Pearson JD; Slezak JM; Zincke H
J Urol; 2000 Nov; 164(5):1591-5. PubMed ID: 11025711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of accuracy between the Partin tables of 1997 and 2001 to predict final pathological stage in clinically localized prostate cancer.
Augustin H; Eggert T; Wenske S; Karakiewicz PI; Palisaar J; Daghofer F; Huland H; Graefen M
J Urol; 2004 Jan; 171(1):177-81. PubMed ID: 14665871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of 2001 Partin tables in Turkey: a multicenter study.
Eskicorapci SY; Karabulut E; Türkeri L; Baltaci S; Cal C; Toktas G; Akpinar H; Ozer G; Sozen S; Tokuc R; Lekili M; Soylu A; Albayrak S; Sahin H; Alpar R; Ozen H
Eur Urol; 2005 Feb; 47(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 15661412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of Partin tables and development of a preoperative nomogram for Japanese patients with clinically localized prostate cancer using 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus on Gleason grading: data from the Clinicopathological Research Group for Localized Prostate Cancer.
Naito S; Kuroiwa K; Kinukawa N; Goto K; Koga H; Ogawa O; Murai M; Shiraishi T;
J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):904-9; discussion 909-10. PubMed ID: 18635221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Partin Tables cannot accurately predict the pathological stage at radical prostatectomy.
Bhojani N; Ahyai S; Graefen M; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Shariat SF; Jeldres C; Erbersdobler A; Schlomm T; Haese A; Steuber T; Heinzer H; Montorsi F; Huland H; Karakiewicz PI
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2009 Feb; 35(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 18786800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. External validation of the updated partin tables in a cohort of French and Italian men.
Bhojani N; Salomon L; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Shariat SF; Jeldres C; Zini L; Pharand D; Péloquin F; Arjane P; Abbou CC; De La Taille A; Montorsi F; Karakiewicz PI
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Feb; 73(2):347-52. PubMed ID: 19004573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How well does the Partin nomogram predict pathological stage after radical prostatectomy in a community based population? Results of the cancer of the prostate strategic urological research endeavor.
Penson DF; Grossfeld GD; Li YP; Henning JM; Lubeck DP; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2002 Apr; 167(4):1653-7; discussion 1657-8. PubMed ID: 11912382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transition zone cancers undermine the predictive accuracy of Partin table stage predictions.
Steuber T; Karakiewicz PI; Augustin H; Erbersdobler A; Lange I; Haese A; Chun KH; Walz J; Graefen M; Huland H
J Urol; 2005 Mar; 173(3):737-41. PubMed ID: 15711259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multi-institutional external validation of seminal vesicle invasion nomograms: head-to-head comparison of Gallina nomogram versus 2007 Partin tables.
Zorn KC; Capitanio U; Jeldres C; Arjane P; Perrotte P; Shariat SF; Lee DI; Shalhav AL; Zagaja GP; Shikanov SA; Gofrit ON; Thong AE; Albala DM; Sun L; Karakiewicz PI
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Apr; 73(5):1461-7. PubMed ID: 18938046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. External validation of the updated Partin tables in a cohort of North American men.
Karakiewicz PI; Bhojani N; Capitanio U; Reuther AM; Suardi N; Jeldres C; Pharand D; Péloquin F; Perrotte P; Shariat SF; Klein EA
J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):898-902; discussion 902-3. PubMed ID: 18635222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predictive ability of partin tables 2001 in a Welsh population.
Ayyathurai R; Ananthakrishnan K; Rajasundaram R; Knight RJ; Toussi H; Srinivasan V
Urol Int; 2006; 76(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 16601382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Combined endorectal and phased-array MRI in the prediction of pelvic lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer.
Wang L; Hricak H; Kattan MW; Schwartz LH; Eberhardt SC; Chen HN; Scardino PT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Mar; 186(3):743-8. PubMed ID: 16498101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prostate-specific antigen improves the ability of clinical stage and biopsy Gleason sum to predict the pathologic stage at radical prostatectomy in the new millennium.
Chun FK; Briganti A; Gallina A; Hutterer GC; Shariat SF; Antebie E; Walz J; Roehrborn CG; Salonia A; Rigatti P; Saad F; Huland H; Montorsi F; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI
Eur Urol; 2007 Oct; 52(4):1067-74. PubMed ID: 17383807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A pretreatment table for the prediction of final histopathology after radical prostatectomy in clinical unilateral T3a prostate cancer.
Joniau S; Hsu CY; Lerut E; Van Baelen A; Haustermans K; Roskams T; Oyen R; Van Poppel H
Eur Urol; 2007 Feb; 51(2):388-94; discussion 395-6. PubMed ID: 16901622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of 1997 Partin Tables' lymph node invasion predictions in men treated with radical prostatectomy in Montreal Quebec.
Karakiewicz PI; Lattouf JB; Perrotte P; Valiquette L; Bénard F; McCormack M; Ménard C; Lebeau T; Benayoun S; Ramirez A; Ouaknine S; Saad F
Can J Urol; 2005 Apr; 12(2):2588-92. PubMed ID: 15877940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predictive models and prostate cancer.
Karakiewicz PI; Hutterer GC
Nat Clin Pract Urol; 2008 Feb; 5(2):82-92. PubMed ID: 18259186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and split-sample validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of seminal vesicle invasion at radical prostatectomy.
Gallina A; Chun FK; Briganti A; Shariat SF; Montorsi F; Salonia A; Erbersdobler A; Rigatti P; Valiquette L; Huland H; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI
Eur Urol; 2007 Jul; 52(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 17267098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Updated nomogram to predict pathologic stage of prostate cancer given prostate-specific antigen level, clinical stage, and biopsy Gleason score (Partin tables) based on cases from 2000 to 2005.
Makarov DV; Trock BJ; Humphreys EB; Mangold LA; Walsh PC; Epstein JI; Partin AW
Urology; 2007 Jun; 69(6):1095-101. PubMed ID: 17572194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can predictive models for prostate cancer patients derived in the United States of America be utilized in European patients? A validation study of the Partin tables.
Graefen M; Augustin H; Karakiewicz PI; Hammerer PG; Haese A; Palisaar J; Blonski J; Fernandez S; Erbersdobler A; Huland H
Eur Urol; 2003 Jan; 43(1):6-10; discussion 11. PubMed ID: 12507538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
