225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18823212)
1. Are phonological representations of printed and spoken language isomorphic? Evidence from the restrictions on unattested onsets.
Berent I
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Oct; 34(5):1288-304. PubMed ID: 18823212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What we know about what we have never heard: evidence from perceptual illusions.
Berent I; Steriade D; Lennertz T; Vaknin V
Cognition; 2007 Sep; 104(3):591-630. PubMed ID: 16934244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Universal constraints on the sound structure of language: phonological or acoustic?
Berent I; Lennertz T
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Feb; 36(1):212-23. PubMed ID: 20121305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Phonological generalizations in dyslexia: the phonological grammar may not be impaired.
Berent I; Vaknin-Nusbaum V; Balaban E; Galaburda AM
Cogn Neuropsychol; 2013; 30(5):285-310. PubMed ID: 24344815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Universal Restrictions on Syllable Structure: Evidence From Mandarin Chinese.
Zhao X; Berent I
J Psycholinguist Res; 2016 Aug; 45(4):795-811. PubMed ID: 25980969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Feedback consistency effects in visual and auditory word recognition: where do we stand after more than a decade?
Ziegler JC; Petrova A; Ferrand L
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):643-61. PubMed ID: 18444762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Production constraints on learning novel onset phonotactics.
Redford MA
Cognition; 2008 Jun; 107(3):785-816. PubMed ID: 18237726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Phonological ambiguity and lexical ambiguity: effects on visual and auditory word recognition.
Frost R; Feldman LB; Katz L
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Jul; 16(4):569-80. PubMed ID: 2142953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Vowel duration affects visual word identification: evidence that the mediating phonology is phonetically informed.
Lukatela G; Eaton T; Sabadini L; Turvey MT
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Feb; 30(1):151-62. PubMed ID: 14769074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Distinctive phonological features differ in relevance for both spoken and written word recognition.
Ernestus M; Mak WM
Brain Lang; 2004; 90(1-3):378-92. PubMed ID: 15172554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is the orthographic/phonological onset a single unit in reading aloud?
Mousikou P; Coltheart M; Saunders S; Yen L
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Feb; 36(1):175-94. PubMed ID: 20121303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sublexical and lexical representations in speech production: effects of phonotactic probability and onset density.
Vitevitch MS; Armbruster J; Chu S
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Mar; 30(2):514-29. PubMed ID: 14979821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Phonological universals in early childhood: Evidence from sonority restrictions.
Berent I; Harder K; Lennertz T
Lang Acquis; 2011; 18(4):281-293. PubMed ID: 22328807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influences of spoken word planning on speech recognition.
Roelofs A; Ozdemir R; Levelt WJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):900-13. PubMed ID: 17723068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rhythmic alternation and the optional complementiser in English: new evidence of phonological influence on grammatical encoding.
Lee MW; Gibbons J
Cognition; 2007 Nov; 105(2):446-56. PubMed ID: 17097626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. On the nature of sonority in spoken word production: evidence from neuropsychology.
Miozzo M; Buchwald A
Cognition; 2013 Sep; 128(3):287-301. PubMed ID: 23742841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Do phonological representations specify variables? Evidence from the obligatory contour principle.
Berent I; Everett DL; Shimron J
Cogn Psychol; 2001 Feb; 42(1):1-60. PubMed ID: 11161416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is phonological context always used to recognize variant forms in spoken word recognition? The role of variant frequency and context distribution.
Ranbom LJ; Connine CM; Yudman EM
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Aug; 35(4):1205-20. PubMed ID: 19653759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of word learning on the perception of non-native consonant sequences.
Davidson L; Shaw J; Adams T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):3697-709. PubMed ID: 18247777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A word-order constraint on phonological activation.
Janssen N; Alario FX; Caramazza A
Psychol Sci; 2008 Mar; 19(3):216-20. PubMed ID: 18315791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
