247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18823486)
1. Comparison of sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for the induction of labour: a systematic review.
Souza AS; Amorim MM; Feitosa FE
BJOG; 2008 Oct; 115(11):1340-9. PubMed ID: 18823486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review.
Hofmeyr GJ; Gülmezoglu AM; Alfirevic Z
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):798-803. PubMed ID: 10453829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Misoprostol compared with prostaglandin E2 for labour induction in women at term with intact membranes and unfavourable cervix: a systematic review.
Crane JM; Butler B; Young DC; Hannah ME
BJOG; 2006 Dec; 113(12):1366-76. PubMed ID: 17081181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour.
Hofmeyr GJ; Gülmezoglu AM
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2003; (1):CD000941. PubMed ID: 12535398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A randomised comparison of patient satisfaction with vaginal and sublingual misoprostol for induction of labour at term.
Nassar AH; Awwad J; Khalil AM; Abu-Musa A; Mehio G; Usta IM
BJOG; 2007 Oct; 114(10):1215-21. PubMed ID: 17877674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sublingual compared with vaginal misoprostol for labour induction at term: a randomised controlled trial.
Bartusevicius A; Barcaite E; Krikstolaitis R; Gintautas V; Nadisauskiene R
BJOG; 2006 Dec; 113(12):1431-7. PubMed ID: 17083652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Misoprostol administered sublingually at a dose of 12.5 μg versus vaginally at a dose of 25 μg for the induction of full-term labor: a randomized controlled trial.
Gattás DSMB; de Amorim MMR; Feitosa FEL; da Silva-Junior JR; Ribeiro LCG; Souza GFA; Souza ASR
Reprod Health; 2020 Apr; 17(1):47. PubMed ID: 32272959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Misoprostol administered sublingually at a dose of 12.5 μg versus vaginally at a dose of 25 μg for the induction of full-term labor: a randomized controlled trial protocol.
Gattás DSMB; da Silva Junior JR; Souza ASR; Feitosa FE; de Amorim MMR
Reprod Health; 2018 Apr; 15(1):65. PubMed ID: 29669596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Buccal or sublingual misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour.
Muzonzini G; Hofmeyr GJ
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004 Oct; 2004(4):CD004221. PubMed ID: 15495088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Oral misoprostol for induction of labour.
Alfirevic Z
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2000; (4):CD001338. PubMed ID: 11034716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Oral misoprostol for induction of labour.
Alfirevic Z
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2001; (2):CD001338. PubMed ID: 11405987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Misoprostol for termination of pregnancy with intrauterine fetal demise in the second and third trimester of pregnancy - a systematic review.
Gómez Ponce de León R; Wing DA
Contraception; 2009 Apr; 79(4):259-71. PubMed ID: 19272495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of 25 µg sublingual and 50 µg intravaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor: a randomized controlled equivalence trial.
Sharami SH; Milani F; Faraji R; Bloukimoghadam K; Salamat F; Momenzadeh S; Ebrahimi H
Arch Iran Med; 2014 Oct; 17(10):652-6. PubMed ID: 25305762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of sublingual misoprostol with that of vaginal misoprostol for labour induction at term.
Sheela CN; John C; Preethi R
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015; 35(5):469-71. PubMed ID: 25358078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Oral misoprostol for induction of labour.
Alfirevic Z; Weeks A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2006 Apr; (2):CD001338. PubMed ID: 16625542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Which method is best for the induction of labour? A systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.
Alfirevic Z; Keeney E; Dowswell T; Welton NJ; Medley N; Dias S; Jones LV; Gyte G; Caldwell DM
Health Technol Assess; 2016 Aug; 20(65):1-584. PubMed ID: 27587290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sublingual compared with oral misoprostol in term labour induction: a randomised controlled trial.
Shetty A; Mackie L; Danielian P; Rice P; Templeton A
BJOG; 2002 Jun; 109(6):645-50. PubMed ID: 12118642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intracervical prostaglandins for induction of labour.
Boulvain M; Kelly A; Irion O
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2008 Jan; (1):CD006971. PubMed ID: 18254122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Balancing the efficacy and safety of misoprostol: a meta-analysis comparing 25 versus 50 micrograms of intravaginal misoprostol for the induction of labour.
McMaster K; Sanchez-Ramos L; Kaunitz AM
BJOG; 2015 Mar; 122(4):468-76. PubMed ID: 24989790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficacy of two intervals and two routes of administration of misoprostol for termination of early pregnancy: a randomised controlled equivalence trial.
von Hertzen H; Piaggio G; Huong NT; Arustamyan K; Cabezas E; Gomez M; Khomassuridze A; Shah R; Mittal S; Nair R; Erdenetungalag R; Huong TM; Vy ND; Phuong NT; Tuyet HT; Peregoudov A;
Lancet; 2007 Jun; 369(9577):1938-46. PubMed ID: 17560446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
