249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18823486)
21. Oral, vaginal and sublingual misoprostol for induction of labor.
Bartusevicius A; Barcaite E; Nadisauskiene R
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2005 Oct; 91(1):2-9. PubMed ID: 16109419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized prospective placebo-controlled study.
Zahran KM; Shahin AY; Abdellah MS; Elsayh KI
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1054-60. PubMed ID: 20144171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour.
Hofmeyr GJ; Gülmezoglu AM; Pileggi C
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2010 Oct; 2010(10):CD000941. PubMed ID: 20927722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A randomised comparative study on sublingual versus vaginal administration of misoprostol for termination of pregnancy between 13 to 20 weeks.
Bhattacharjee N; Saha SP; Ghoshroy SC; Bhowmik S; Barui G
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Apr; 48(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 18366490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Misoprostol for induction of labour to terminate pregnancy in the second or third trimester for women with a fetal anomaly or after intrauterine fetal death.
Dodd JM; Crowther CA
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2010 Apr; 2010(4):CD004901. PubMed ID: 20393941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour.
Hofmeyr GJ; Gulmezoglu AM
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2001; (1):CD000941. PubMed ID: 11279698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol tablets in induction of labour at term.
Shetty A; Danielian P; Templeton A
BJOG; 2001 Mar; 108(3):238-43. PubMed ID: 11281461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Misoprostol versus cervagem for the induction of labour to terminate pregnancy in the second and third trimester: a systematic review.
Dodd JM; Crowther CA
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Mar; 125(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 16466671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley catheters, misoprostol, and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in the induction of labour.
Chen W; Xue J; Peprah MK; Wen SW; Walker M; Gao Y; Tang Y
BJOG; 2016 Feb; 123(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 26538408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A comparative study on sublingual versus oral and vaginal administration of misoprostol for late first and early second trimester abortion.
Ganguly RP; Saha SP; Mukhopadhyay S; Bhattacharjee N; Bhattacharyya SK; Patra KK
J Indian Med Assoc; 2010 May; 108(5):283-4, 286. PubMed ID: 21121402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Vaginal prostaglandin (PGE2 and PGF2a) for induction of labour at term.
Kelly AJ; Kavanagh J; Thomas J
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2001; (2):CD003101. PubMed ID: 11406078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A prospective randomised comparison of sublingual and vaginal misoprostol in second trimester termination of pregnancy.
Tang OS; Lau WN; Chan CC; Ho PC
BJOG; 2004 Sep; 111(9):1001-5. PubMed ID: 15327617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Efficacy comparison of titrated oral solution of misoprostol and intravenous oxytocin on labour induction in women with full-term pregnancy.
Kashanian M; Eshraghi N; Rahimi M; Sheikhansari N; Javanmanesh F
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Jan; 40(1):20-24. PubMed ID: 31195867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of vaginal and oral misoprostol, for the induction of labour in women with intra-uterine foetal death.
Nyende L; Towobola OA; Mabina MH
East Afr Med J; 2004 Apr; 81(4):179-82. PubMed ID: 15884282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Induction of labour in nulliparous women- quick or slow: a cohort study comparing slow-release vaginal insert with low-dose misoprostol oral tablets.
Eriksson A; Jeppesen S; Krebs L
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Feb; 20(1):79. PubMed ID: 32033600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Sublingual vs. vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor.
Feitosa FE; Sampaio ZS; Alencar CA; Amorim MM; Passini R
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2006 Aug; 94(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 16828095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Oral versus vaginal misoprostol for labour induction.
Rasheed R; Alam AA; Younus S; Raza F
J Pak Med Assoc; 2007 Aug; 57(8):404-7. PubMed ID: 17902524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Oral misoprostol for induction of labour at term: randomised controlled trial.
Dodd JM; Crowther CA; Robinson JS
BMJ; 2006 Mar; 332(7540):509-13. PubMed ID: 16455695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A randomised controlled trial of mifepristone in combination with misoprostol administered sublingually or vaginally for medical abortion up to 13 weeks of gestation.
Hamoda H; Ashok PW; Flett GM; Templeton A
BJOG; 2005 Aug; 112(8):1102-8. PubMed ID: 16045525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Oral misoprostol for induction of labour with a viable fetus.
Alfirevic Z; Howarth G; Gaussmann A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2000; (2):CD001338. PubMed ID: 10796260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
