BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18823521)

  • 1. Specialty-specific multi-source feedback: assuring validity, informing training.
    Davies H; Archer J; Bateman A; Dewar S; Crossley J; Grant J; Southgate L
    Med Educ; 2008 Oct; 42(10):1014-20. PubMed ID: 18823521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Republished paper: Assuring validity of multisource feedback in a national programme.
    Archer J; McGraw M; Davies H
    Postgrad Med J; 2010 Sep; 86(1019):526-31. PubMed ID: 20841329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assuring validity of multisource feedback in a national programme.
    Archer J; McGraw M; Davies H
    Arch Dis Child; 2010 May; 95(5):330-5. PubMed ID: 20457700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing the surgical skills of trainees in the operating theatre: a prospective observational study of the methodology.
    Beard JD; Marriott J; Purdie H; Crossley J
    Health Technol Assess; 2011 Jan; 15(1):i-xxi, 1-162. PubMed ID: 21227024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. mini-PAT (Peer Assessment Tool): a valid component of a national assessment programme in the UK?
    Archer J; Norcini J; Southgate L; Heard S; Davies H
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 May; 13(2):181-92. PubMed ID: 17036157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors that might undermine the validity of patient and multi-source feedback.
    Archer JC; McAvoy P
    Med Educ; 2011 Sep; 45(9):886-93. PubMed ID: 21848716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing doctors' competencies using multisource feedback: validating a Japanese version of the Sheffield Peer Review Assessment Tool (SPRAT).
    Sasaki H; Archer J; Yonemoto N; Mori R; Nishida T; Kusuda S; Nakayama T
    BMJ Open; 2015 Jun; 5(6):e007135. PubMed ID: 26078310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An investigation into the use of multi-source feedback (MSF) as a work-based assessment tool.
    Brown JM; Lowe K; Fillingham J; Murphy PN; Bamforth M; Shaw NJ
    Med Teach; 2014 Nov; 36(11):997-1004. PubMed ID: 24804910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of rating scales on scores given to junior doctors in multi-source feedback.
    Hassell A; Bullock A; Whitehouse A; Wood L; Jones P; Wall D
    Postgrad Med J; 2012 Jan; 88(1035):10-4. PubMed ID: 22052883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Feasibility, quality and validity of narrative multisource feedback in postgraduate training: a mixed-method study.
    Holm EA; Al-Bayati SJL; Barfod TS; Lembeck MA; Pedersen H; Ramberg E; Klemmensen ÅK; Sorensen JL
    BMJ Open; 2021 Jul; 11(7):e047019. PubMed ID: 34321296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Initial evaluation of the first year of the Foundation Assessment Programme.
    Davies H; Archer J; Southgate L; Norcini J
    Med Educ; 2009 Jan; 43(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 19141000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A single generic multi-source feedback tool for revalidation of all UK career-grade doctors: does one size fit all?
    Mackillop LH; Crossley J; Vivekananda-Schmidt P; Wade W; Armitage M
    Med Teach; 2011; 33(2):e75-83. PubMed ID: 21275537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A multisource feedback tool to assess ward round leadership skills of senior paediatric trainees: (2) Testing reliability and practicability.
    Goodyear HM; Lakshminarayana I; Wall D; Bindal T
    Postgrad Med J; 2015 May; 91(1075):268-73. PubMed ID: 25941417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ensuring quality in postgraduate medical education: competency testing is the key.
    Bailey D
    Virchows Arch; 2016 Jan; 468(1):115-9. PubMed ID: 26374106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How ratings vary by staff group in multi-source feedback assessment of junior doctors.
    Bullock AD; Hassell A; Markham WA; Wall DW; Whitehouse AB
    Med Educ; 2009 Jun; 43(6):516-20. PubMed ID: 19493174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Difficulty giving feedback on underperformance undermines the educational value of multi-source feedback.
    Ingram JR; Anderson EJ; Pugsley L
    Med Teach; 2013 Oct; 35(10):838-46. PubMed ID: 23808684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 'Team observation': a six-year study of the development and use of multi-source feedback (360-degree assessment) in obstetrics and gynaecology training in the UK.
    Wood L; Wall D; Bullock A; Hassell A; Whitehouse A; Campbell I
    Med Teach; 2006 Nov; 28(7):e177-84. PubMed ID: 17594543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The reliability of multisource feedback in competency-based assessment programs: the effects of multiple occasions and assessor groups.
    Moonen-van Loon JM; Overeem K; Govaerts MJ; Verhoeven BH; van der Vleuten CP; Driessen EW
    Acad Med; 2015 Aug; 90(8):1093-9. PubMed ID: 25993283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can student self-ratings be compared with peer ratings? A study of measurement invariance of multisource feedback.
    Lee KL; Tsai SL; Chiu YT; Ho MJ
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2016 May; 21(2):401-13. PubMed ID: 26387118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of SPRAT for peer review of paediatricians in training.
    Archer JC; Norcini J; Davies HA
    BMJ; 2005 May; 330(7502):1251-3. PubMed ID: 15883137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.