BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18823532)

  • 1. MetaMQAP: a meta-server for the quality assessment of protein models.
    Pawlowski M; Gajda MJ; Matlak R; Bujnicki JM
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Sep; 9():403. PubMed ID: 18823532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Benchmarking consensus model quality assessment for protein fold recognition.
    McGuffin LJ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Sep; 8():345. PubMed ID: 17877795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prediction of global and local model quality in CASP7 using Pcons and ProQ.
    Wallner B; Elofsson A
    Proteins; 2007; 69 Suppl 8():184-93. PubMed ID: 17894353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of global and local model quality in CASP8 using Pcons and ProQ.
    Larsson P; Skwark MJ; Wallner B; Elofsson A
    Proteins; 2009; 77 Suppl 9():167-72. PubMed ID: 19544566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction of global and local model quality in CASP8 using the ModFOLD server.
    McGuffin LJ
    Proteins; 2009; 77 Suppl 9():185-90. PubMed ID: 19585661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rapid model quality assessment for protein structure predictions using the comparison of multiple models without structural alignments.
    McGuffin LJ; Roche DB
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Jan; 26(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 19897565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating the absolute quality of a single protein model using structural features and support vector machines.
    Wang Z; Tegge AN; Cheng J
    Proteins; 2009 May; 75(3):638-47. PubMed ID: 19004001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating quality of template-based protein models by alignment stability.
    Chen H; Kihara D
    Proteins; 2008 May; 71(3):1255-74. PubMed ID: 18041762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An iterative self-refining and self-evaluating approach for protein model quality estimation.
    Wang Z; Cheng J
    Protein Sci; 2012 Jan; 21(1):142-51. PubMed ID: 22057943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prediction of global and local quality of CASP8 models by MULTICOM series.
    Cheng J; Wang Z; Tegge AN; Eickholt J
    Proteins; 2009; 77 Suppl 9():181-4. PubMed ID: 19544564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing the quality of modelled 3D protein structures using the ModFOLD server.
    Roche DB; Buenavista MT; McGuffin LJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1137():83-103. PubMed ID: 24573476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MQAPsingle: A quasi single-model approach for estimation of the quality of individual protein structure models.
    Pawlowski M; Kozlowski L; Kloczkowski A
    Proteins; 2016 Aug; 84(8):1021-8. PubMed ID: 25737479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automated tertiary structure prediction with accurate local model quality assessment using the IntFOLD-TS method.
    McGuffin LJ; Roche DB
    Proteins; 2011; 79 Suppl 10():137-46. PubMed ID: 22069035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of predictions in the model quality assessment category.
    Cozzetto D; Kryshtafovych A; Ceriani M; Tramontano A
    Proteins; 2007; 69 Suppl 8():175-83. PubMed ID: 17680695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. CAD-score: a new contact area difference-based function for evaluation of protein structural models.
    Olechnovič K; Kulberkytė E; Venclovas C
    Proteins; 2013 Jan; 81(1):149-62. PubMed ID: 22933340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Methods of model accuracy estimation can help selecting the best models from decoy sets: Assessment of model accuracy estimations in CASP11.
    Kryshtafovych A; Barbato A; Monastyrskyy B; Fidelis K; Schwede T; Tramontano A
    Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):349-69. PubMed ID: 26344049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fams-ace: a combined method to select the best model after remodeling all server models.
    Terashi G; Takeda-Shitaka M; Kanou K; Iwadate M; Takaya D; Hosoi A; Ohta K; Umeyama H
    Proteins; 2007; 69 Suppl 8():98-107. PubMed ID: 17894329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of model accuracy estimations in CASP12.
    Kryshtafovych A; Monastyrskyy B; Fidelis K; Schwede T; Tramontano A
    Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):345-360. PubMed ID: 28833563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. FragQA: predicting local fragment quality of a sequence-structure alignment.
    Gao X; Bu D; Li SC; Xu J; Li M
    Genome Inform; 2007; 19():27-39. PubMed ID: 18546502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automated server predictions in CASP7.
    Battey JN; Kopp J; Bordoli L; Read RJ; Clarke ND; Schwede T
    Proteins; 2007; 69 Suppl 8():68-82. PubMed ID: 17894354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.