194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18823747)
1. Role of surgical position on interface stress and initial bone remodeling stimulus around hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
Ong KL; Day JS; Kurtz SM; Field RE; Manley MT
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Oct; 24(7):1137-42. PubMed ID: 18823747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A numerical study of failure mechanisms in the cemented resurfaced femur: effects of interface characteristics and bone remodelling.
Pal B; Gupta S; New AM
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 May; 223(4):471-84. PubMed ID: 19499837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of the stem fixation scenario on load transfer in a hip resurfacing arthroplasty with a biomimetic stem.
Caouette C; Bureau MN; Vendittoli PA; Lavigne M; Nuño N
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2015 May; 45():90-100. PubMed ID: 25688031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanics of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
Ong KL; Kurtz SM; Manley MT; Rushton N; Mohammed NA; Field RE
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Aug; 88(8):1110-5. PubMed ID: 16877617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Experimental evaluation of new concepts in hip arthroplasty.
Wik TS
Acta Orthop Suppl; 2012 Apr; 83(345):1-26. PubMed ID: 22489909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Load-transfer analysis after insertion of cementless anatomical femoral stem using pre- and post-operative CT images based patient-specific finite element analysis.
Yamako G; Chosa E; Zhao X; Totoribe K; Watanabe S; Sakamoto T; Nakane N
Med Eng Phys; 2014 Jun; 36(6):694-700. PubMed ID: 24629623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Numerical evaluation of bone remodelling and adaptation considering different hip prosthesis designs.
Levadnyi I; Awrejcewicz J; Gubaua JE; Pereira JT
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2017 Dec; 50():122-129. PubMed ID: 29100185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A mechanical analysis of femoral resurfacing implantation for osteonecrosis of the femoral head.
Sakagoshi D; Kabata T; Umemoto Y; Sakamoto J; Tomita K
J Arthroplasty; 2010 Dec; 25(8):1282-9. PubMed ID: 19879726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Position of hip resurfacing component affects strain and resistance to fracture in the femoral neck.
Vail TP; Glisson RR; Dominguez DE; Kitaoka K; Ottaviano D
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Sep; 90(9):1951-60. PubMed ID: 18762656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of Charnley hip neck-angle inclination on the stresses at stem/cement and bone/cement interfaces.
Zaki M; Saad F; Al-Ebiary MN
Biomed Mater Eng; 2002; 12(4):411-21. PubMed ID: 12652035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Surgical variables affect the mechanics of a hip resurfacing system.
Long JP; Bartel DL
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Dec; 453():115-22. PubMed ID: 17016222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Role of loads and prosthesis material properties on the mechanics of the proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty.
Cheal EJ; Spector M; Hayes WC
J Orthop Res; 1992 May; 10(3):405-22. PubMed ID: 1569504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is a valgus position of the femoral component in hip resurfacing protective against spontaneous fracture of the femoral neck?: a biomechanical study.
Schnurr C; Nessler J; Meyer C; Schild HH; Koebke J; König DP
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Apr; 91(4):545-51. PubMed ID: 19336820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Activity and loading influence the predicted bone remodeling around cemented hip replacements.
Dickinson AS
J Biomech Eng; 2014 Apr; 136(4):. PubMed ID: 24337038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bone remodelling of a proximal femur with the thrust plate prosthesis: an in vitro case.
Taylor WR; Ploeg H; Hertig D; Warner MD; Clift SE
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2004 Jun; 7(3):131-7. PubMed ID: 15512756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical study of the resurfacing hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis of the femoral component.
Watanabe Y; Shiba N; Matsuo S; Higuchi F; Tagawa Y; Inoue A
J Arthroplasty; 2000 Jun; 15(4):505-11. PubMed ID: 10884212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Influence of proximal stem geometry and stem-cement interface characteristics on bone and cement stresses in femoral hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis].
Massin P; Astoin E; Lavaste F
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Apr; 89(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 12844057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Finite element analysis of femoral neck stress in relation to pelvic width.
Schwarzkopf R; Dong NN; Fetto JF
Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2011; 69(4):292-7. PubMed ID: 22196384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Custom-designed orthopedic implants evaluated using finite element analysis of patient-specific computed tomography data: femoral-component case study.
Harrysson OL; Hosni YA; Nayfeh JF
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2007 Sep; 8():91. PubMed ID: 17854508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
