BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

33 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18823814)

  • 1. Quantitative three-dimensional elasticity imaging from quasi-static deformation: a phantom study.
    Richards MS; Barbone PE; Oberai AA
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Feb; 54(3):757-79. PubMed ID: 19131669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A PDE-Based Regularization Algorithm Toward Reducing Speckle Tracking Noise: A Feasibility Study for Ultrasound Breast Elastography.
    Guo L; Xu Y; Xu Z; Jiang J
    Ultrason Imaging; 2015 Oct; 37(4):277-93. PubMed ID: 25452434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Incompressible deformation estimation algorithm (IDEA) from tagged MR images.
    Liu X; Abd-Elmoniem KZ; Stone M; Murano EZ; Zhuo J; Gullapalli RP; Prince JL
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 Feb; 31(2):326-40. PubMed ID: 21937342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. C-Elastography: In Vitro Feasibility Phantom Study.
    Shahraki DP; Kumar V; Ghavami S; Urban MW; Alizad A; Guzina BB; Fatemi M
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2020 Jul; 46(7):1738-1754. PubMed ID: 32312548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 3-D visualization and non-linear tissue classification of breast tumors using ultrasound elastography in vivo.
    Sayed A; Layne G; Abraham J; Mukdadi OM
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1490-502. PubMed ID: 24768484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lesion edge preserved direct average strain estimation for ultrasound elasticity imaging.
    Hussain MA; Alam F; Rupa SA; Awwal R; Lee SY; Hasan MK
    Ultrasonics; 2014 Jan; 54(1):137-46. PubMed ID: 23806339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Direct mean strain estimation for elastography using nearest-neighbor weighted least-squares approach in the frequency domain.
    Hasan MK; Anas EM; Alam SK; Lee SY
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 Oct; 38(10):1759-77. PubMed ID: 22818879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three-dimensional Ultrasound Elasticity Imaging on an Automated Breast Volume Scanning System.
    Wang Y; Nasief HG; Kohn S; Milkowski A; Clary T; Barnes S; Barbone PE; Hall TJ
    Ultrason Imaging; 2017 Nov; 39(6):369-392. PubMed ID: 28585511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 2-D locally regularized tissue strain estimation from radio-frequency ultrasound images: theoretical developments and results on experimental data.
    Brusseau E; Kybic J; Deprez JF; Basset O
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 Feb; 27(2):145-60. PubMed ID: 18334437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 3D estimation of soft biological tissue deformation from radio-frequency ultrasound volume acquisitions.
    Deprez JF; Brusseau E; Schmitt C; Cloutier G; Basset O
    Med Image Anal; 2009 Feb; 13(1):116-27. PubMed ID: 18823814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breast elasticity: principles, technique, results: an update and overview of commercially available software.
    Balleyguier C; Canale S; Ben Hassen W; Vielh P; Bayou EH; Mathieu MC; Uzan C; Bourgier C; Dromain C
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Mar; 82(3):427-34. PubMed ID: 22445593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recent technological advancements in breast ultrasound.
    Eisenbrey JR; Dave JK; Forsberg F
    Ultrasonics; 2016 Aug; 70():183-90. PubMed ID: 27179143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.