These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

349 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18824190)

  • 1. Feature-based attention and the suppression of non-relevant object features.
    Wegener D; Ehn F; Aurich MK; Galashan FO; Kreiter AK
    Vision Res; 2008 Dec; 48(27):2696-707. PubMed ID: 18824190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Not all features are created equal: Processing asymmetries between location and object features.
    Chen Z
    Vision Res; 2009 May; 49(11):1481-91. PubMed ID: 19303423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of feature-based attention on the motion aftereffect at remote locations.
    Boynton GM; Ciaramitaro VM; Arman AC
    Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(18):2968-76. PubMed ID: 16698060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Object-based cross-feature attentional modulation from color to motion.
    Sohn W; Papathomas TV; Blaser E; Vidnyánszky Z
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1437-43. PubMed ID: 15066402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attentional effects on sensory tuning for single-feature detection and double-feature conjunction.
    Neri P
    Vision Res; 2004 Dec; 44(26):3053-64. PubMed ID: 15474578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Object-based selection of irrelevant features is not confined to the attended object.
    Boehler CN; Schoenfeld MA; Heinze HJ; Hopf JM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Sep; 23(9):2231-9. PubMed ID: 20666592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Location and color biases have different influences on selective attention.
    Fecteau JH; Korjoukov I; Roelfsema PR
    Vision Res; 2009 May; 49(9):996-1005. PubMed ID: 19324066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of spatial attention and salience cues on chromatic and achromatic motion processing.
    Dobkins KR; Rezec AA; Krekelberg B
    Vision Res; 2007 Jun; 47(14):1893-906. PubMed ID: 17445859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Subthreshold features of visual objects: unseen but not unbound.
    Melcher D; Vidnyánszky Z
    Vision Res; 2006 Jun; 46(12):1863-7. PubMed ID: 16414096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Object-based attention and visual area LO.
    de-Wit LH; Kentridge RW; Milner AD
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 May; 47(6):1483-90. PubMed ID: 19038274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of unattended features on object processing depends on task demand.
    Mayer KM; Vuong QC
    Vision Res; 2012 Mar; 56():20-7. PubMed ID: 22306678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrophysiological indices of target and distractor processing in visual search.
    Hickey C; Di Lollo V; McDonald JJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):760-75. PubMed ID: 18564048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Failure of colour and contrast polarity identification at threshold for detection of motion and global form.
    Seymour KJ; Scott McDonald J; Clifford CW
    Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(12):1592-8. PubMed ID: 19341760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination.
    Fujisaki W; Nishida S
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 18281153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Simultaneous priming along multiple feature dimensions in a visual search task.
    Kristjánsson A
    Vision Res; 2006 Aug; 46(16):2554-70. PubMed ID: 16527323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Feature-based attention spreads preferentially in an object-specific manner.
    Festman Y; Braun J
    Vision Res; 2012 Feb; 54():31-8. PubMed ID: 22227158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceptual-binding and persistent surface segregation.
    Moradi F; Shimojo S
    Vision Res; 2004 Nov; 44(25):2885-99. PubMed ID: 15380994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differentiating spatial and object-based effects on attention: an event-related brain potential study with peripheral cueing.
    He X; Humphreys G; Fan S; Chen L; Han S
    Brain Res; 2008 Dec; 1245():116-25. PubMed ID: 18955038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatial and feature-based effects of exogenous cueing on visual motion processing.
    Busse L; Katzner S; Treue S
    Vision Res; 2006 Jun; 46(13):2019-27. PubMed ID: 16476463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recovery from object substitution masking induced by transient suppression of visual motion processing: a repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation study.
    Hirose N; Kihara K; Mima T; Ueki Y; Fukuyama H; Osaka N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1495-503. PubMed ID: 18085959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.