121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18824308)
61. An HPV 16, 18, and 45 genotyping test based on Hybrid Capture technology.
Thai H; Rangwala S; Gay T; Keating K; McLeod S; Nazarenko I; O'Neil D; Pfister D; Loeffert D
J Clin Virol; 2009 Jul; 45 Suppl 1():S93-7. PubMed ID: 19651375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Hospital-based prevalence and sensitivity of high-risk human papillomavirus in Thai urban population.
Suwannarurk K; Tapanadechopol P; Pattaraarchachai J; Bhamarapravati S
Cancer Epidemiol; 2009 Jul; 33(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 19679049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. comparison of two commercial assays for detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) in cervical scrape specimens: validation of the Roche AMPLICOR HPV test as a means to screen for HPV genotypes associated with a higher risk of cervical disorders.
van Ham MA; Bakkers JM; Harbers GK; Quint WG; Massuger LF; Melchers WJ
J Clin Microbiol; 2005 Jun; 43(6):2662-7. PubMed ID: 15956381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Comparison of the SPF10-LiPA system to the Hybrid Capture 2 Assay for detection of carcinogenic human papillomavirus genotypes among 5,683 young women in Guanacaste, Costa Rica.
Safaeian M; Herrero R; Hildesheim A; Quint W; Freer E; Van Doorn LJ; Porras C; Silva S; González P; Bratti MC; Rodriguez AC; Castle P;
J Clin Microbiol; 2007 May; 45(5):1447-54. PubMed ID: 17344361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Results at recruitment from a randomized controlled trial comparing human papillomavirus testing alone with conventional cytology as the primary cervical cancer screening test.
Ronco G; Giorgi-Rossi P; Carozzi F; Confortini M; Dalla Palma P; Del Mistro A; Gillio-Tos A; Minucci D; Naldoni C; Rizzolo R; Schincaglia P; Volante R; Zappa M; Zorzi M; Cuzick J; Segnan N;
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Apr; 100(7):492-501. PubMed ID: 18364502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Age-specific evaluation of primary human papillomavirus screening vs conventional cytology in a randomized setting.
Leinonen M; Nieminen P; Kotaniemi-Talonen L; Malila N; Tarkkanen J; Laurila P; Anttila A
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Dec; 101(23):1612-23. PubMed ID: 19903804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Comparative analysis of a liquid-based Pap test and concurrent HPV DNA assay of residual samples. A study of 608 cases.
Hong IS; Marshalleck J; Williams RH; Gaiter TE; Mielzynska-Lohnas I; Kim K
Acta Cytol; 2002; 46(5):828-34. PubMed ID: 12365215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Evaluation of the SureX HPV genotyping test for the detection of high-risk HPV in cervical cancer screening.
Wei B; Mei P; Huang S; Yu X; Zhi T; Wang G; Xu X; Xiao L; Dong X; Cui W
Virol J; 2020 Nov; 17(1):171. PubMed ID: 33168022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Contribution of human papillomavirus testing by hybrid capture in the triage of women with repeated abnormal pap smears before colposcopy referral.
Fait G; Kupferminc MJ; Daniel Y; Geva E; Ron IG; Lessing JB; Bar-Am A
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Nov; 79(2):177-80. PubMed ID: 11063640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Risk of precancer and follow-up management strategies for women with human papillomavirus-negative atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Safaeian M; Solomon D; Wacholder S; Schiffman M; Castle P
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jun; 109(6):1325-31. PubMed ID: 17540804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Comparison of clinical performances among Roche Cobas HPV, RFMP HPV PapilloTyper and Hybrid Capture 2 assays for detection of high-risk types of human papillomavirus.
Yu S; Kwon MJ; Lee EH; Park H; Woo HY
J Med Virol; 2015 Sep; 87(9):1587-93. PubMed ID: 25914215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Accuracy and interlaboratory reliability of human papillomavirus DNA testing by hybrid capture.
Schiffman MH; Kiviat NB; Burk RD; Shah KV; Daniel RW; Lewis R; Kuypers J; Manos MM; Scott DR; Sherman ME
J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Mar; 33(3):545-50. PubMed ID: 7751355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Agreement between the AMPLICOR Human Papillomavirus Test and the Hybrid Capture 2 assay in detection of high-risk human papillomavirus and diagnosis of biopsy-confirmed high-grade cervical disease.
Carozzi F; Bisanzi S; Sani C; Zappa M; Cecchini S; Ciatto S; Confortini M
J Clin Microbiol; 2007 Feb; 45(2):364-9. PubMed ID: 17122008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Correlation of Pap smear, cervical biopsy, and clinical follow-up with an HPV typing microarray system.
Nuovo GJ; Bartholomew D; Jung WW; Han IK; Um T; Grabarz DF; Lee DJ; McCabe RT
Diagn Mol Pathol; 2008 Jun; 17(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 18382353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. [Enhanced molecular techniques for the diagnosis of human papillomavirus infections].
Ursu RG; Onofriescu M; Nemescu D; Iancu LS
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2009; 113(4):1205-10. PubMed ID: 20191900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Comparison of cytology, HPV DNA testing and HPV 16/18 genotyping alone or combined targeting to the more balanced methodology for cervical cancer screening.
Chatzistamatiou K; Moysiadis T; Moschaki V; Panteleris N; Agorastos T
Gynecol Oncol; 2016 Jul; 142(1):120-127. PubMed ID: 27126005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Combined p16INK4a and human papillomavirus testing improves the prediction of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN II-III) in Thai patients with low-grade cytological abnormalities.
Ekalaksananan T; Pientong C; Kongyingyoes B; Chaiwongkot A; Yuenyao P; Kleebkaow P; Kritpetcharat O; Evans MF
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(7):1777-83. PubMed ID: 22126564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Prevalence and distribution of human papillomavirus genotypes in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in China: a meta-analysis.
Zhang J; Cheng K; Wang Z
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 Dec; 302(6):1329-1337. PubMed ID: 32914222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. High-risk human papillomavirus genotype distribution and attribution to cervical cancer and precancerous lesions in a rural Chinese population.
Zhao XL; Hu SY; Zhang Q; Dong L; Feng RM; Han R; Zhao FH
J Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Jul; 28(4):e30. PubMed ID: 28541628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Significance and possible causes of false-negative results of reflex human Papillomavirus infection testing.
Eltoum IA; Chhieng DC; Crowe DR; Roberson J; Jin G; Broker TR
Cancer; 2007 Jun; 111(3):154-9. PubMed ID: 17477380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
