These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. [Analysis of the epidemiological data concerning radiation carcinogenic effects and approaches to the low doses' upper limits determination in the aspect of a threshold of the unhealthy influences of ionizing radiation]. Rozhdestvenskiĭ LM Radiats Biol Radioecol; 2003; 43(2):227-36. PubMed ID: 12754817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Cancer morbidity and mortality among the liquidators of the Chernobyl accident: estimation of radiation risks]. Ivanov VK; Tsyb AF; Gorskiĭ AI; Maksiutov MA; Chekin SIu; Petrov AV; Tumanov KA; Kashcheev VV Radiats Biol Radioecol; 2006; 46(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 16756113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Protraction effects in radiation studies: epidemiology. Ron E Radiat Res; 2000 Dec; 154(6):737-8. PubMed ID: 11187024 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Some statistical implications of dose uncertainty in radiation dose-response analyses. Schafer DW; Gilbert ES Radiat Res; 2006 Jul; 166(1 Pt 2):303-12. PubMed ID: 16808615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Two principal considerations are needed after low doses of ionizing radiation. Feinendegen LE; Paretzke H; Neumann RD Radiat Res; 2008 Feb; 169(2):247-8. PubMed ID: 18220467 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The meaning of low dose and low dose-rate. Wakeford R; Tawn EJ J Radiol Prot; 2010 Mar; 30(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 20234068 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiation-epidemiological studies of thyroid cancer incidence in Russia after the Chernobyl accident (estimation of radiation risks, 1991-2008 follow-up period). Ivanov VK; Kashcheev VV; Chekin SY; Maksioutov MA; Tumanov KA; Vlasov OK; Shchukina NV; Tsyb AF Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Sep; 151(3):489-99. PubMed ID: 22416255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Epidemiology. Radiation dangerous even at lowest doses. Kaiser J Science; 2005 Jul; 309(5732):233. PubMed ID: 16002592 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Biologically based analysis of lung cancer incidence in a large Canadian occupational cohort with low-dose ionizing radiation exposure, and comparison with Japanese atomic bomb survivors. Hazelton WD; Moolgavkar SH; Curtis SB; Zielinski JM; Ashmore JP; Krewski D J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2006 Jun; 69(11):1013-38. PubMed ID: 16840251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiation risk estimation in human populations: lessons from the radiological accident in Brazil. da Cruz AD; Volpe JP; Saddi V; Curry J; Curadoc MP; Glickman BW Mutat Res; 1997 Feb; 373(2):207-14. PubMed ID: 9042402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Thyroid cancer risk to children calculated. Jacob P; Goulko G; Heidenreich WF; Likhtarev I; Kairo I; Tronko ND; Bogdanova TI; Kenigsberg J; Buglova E; Drozdovitch V; Golovneva A; Demidchik EP; Balonov M; Zvonova I; Beral V Nature; 1998 Mar; 392(6671):31-2. PubMed ID: 9510245 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiation risks of medical imaging: separating fact from fantasy. Hendee WR; O'Connor MK Radiology; 2012 Aug; 264(2):312-21. PubMed ID: 22821690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Common sense about the linear no-threshold controversy-give the general public a break. Leonard BE Radiat Res; 2008 Feb; 169(2):245-6; author reply 246-7. PubMed ID: 18220465 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]