575 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18826585)
1. Sensitivity of imaging for multifocal-multicentric breast carcinoma.
Bozzini A; Renne G; Meneghetti L; Bandi G; Santos G; Vento AR; Menna S; Andrighetto S; Viale G; Cassano E; Bellomi M
BMC Cancer; 2008 Sep; 8():275. PubMed ID: 18826585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sensitivity of MRI versus mammography for detecting foci of multifocal, multicentric breast cancer in Fatty and dense breasts using the whole-breast pathologic examination as a gold standard.
Sardanelli F; Giuseppetti GM; Panizza P; Bazzocchi M; Fausto A; Simonetti G; Lattanzio V; Del Maschio A;
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Oct; 183(4):1149-57. PubMed ID: 15385322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The clinical impact of breast scintigraphy acquired with a breast specific γ-camera (BSGC) in the diagnosis of breast cancer: incremental value versus mammography.
Spanu A; Sanna D; Chessa F; Manca A; Cottu P; Fancellu A; Nuvoli S; Madeddu G
Int J Oncol; 2012 Aug; 41(2):483-9. PubMed ID: 22641247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer.
Berg WA; Gutierrez L; NessAiver MS; Carter WB; Bhargavan M; Lewis RS; Ioffe OB
Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):830-49. PubMed ID: 15486214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multifocal, multicentric, and contralateral breast cancers: bilateral whole-breast US in the preoperative evaluation of patients.
Moon WK; Noh DY; Im JG
Radiology; 2002 Aug; 224(2):569-76. PubMed ID: 12147858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection (CAD) of breast cancer].
Yang KY; Liu XJ; Zhai RY
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 May; 34(5):360-3. PubMed ID: 22883457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multifocal, multicentric and contralateral breast cancers: breast MR imaging in the preoperative evaluation of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer.
Girardi V; Carbognin G; Camera L; Baglio I; Bucci A; Bonetti F; Mucelli RP
Radiol Med; 2011 Dec; 116(8):1226-38. PubMed ID: 21744256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Diagnostic imaging of lobular carcinoma of the breast: mammographic, ultrasonographic and MR findings].
Bazzocchi M; Facecchia I; Zuiani C; Puglisi F; Di Loreto C; Smania S
Radiol Med; 2000 Dec; 100(6):436-43. PubMed ID: 11307504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41.
Hooley RJ; Greenberg KL; Stackhouse RM; Geisel JL; Butler RS; Philpotts LE
Radiology; 2012 Oct; 265(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 22723501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of the amount of peritumoral adipose tissue in the detection of additional tumors with digital breast tomosynthesis and ultrasound.
García-Barquín P; Páramo M; Elizalde A; Pina L; Etxano J; Fernandez-Montero A; Caballeros M
Acta Radiol; 2017 Jun; 58(6):645-651. PubMed ID: 28273729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multicentric Cancer Detected at Breast MR Imaging and Not at Mammography: Important or Not?
Iacconi C; Galman L; Zheng J; Sacchini V; Sutton EJ; Dershaw D; Morris EA
Radiology; 2016 May; 279(2):378-84. PubMed ID: 26605912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Importance of the preoperative evaluation of multifocal and multicentric breast cancer with magnetic resonance imaging in women with dense parenchyma.
Olivas-Maguregui S; Villaseñor-Navarro Y; Ferrari-Carballo T; Morales-Chairez V; Michel-Ortega RM; Cerón-Lizarraga T; Silva-Godínez JC; Arrieta O
Rev Invest Clin; 2008; 60(5):382-9. PubMed ID: 19227435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis, digital mammography, and ultrasonography.
Su X; Lin Q; Cui C; Xu W; Wei Z; Fei J; Li L
Breast Cancer; 2017 Jul; 24(4):562-570. PubMed ID: 27837442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Karatasiou A; Pronio A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification--a pilot study.
Wenkel E; Heckmann M; Heinrich M; Schwab SA; Uder M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz WA; Janka R
Rofo; 2008 Sep; 180(9):804-8. PubMed ID: 18704878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection and diagnosis of automated breast ultrasound in patients with BI-RADS category 4 microcalcifications: a retrospective study.
Yu LF; Dai CC; Zhu LX; Xu XJ; Yan HJ; Jiang CX; Bao LY
BMC Med Imaging; 2024 May; 24(1):126. PubMed ID: 38807064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast cancer detection using sonography in women with mammographically dense breasts.
Okello J; Kisembo H; Bugeza S; Galukande M
BMC Med Imaging; 2014 Dec; 14():41. PubMed ID: 25547239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving breast cancer detection using ultrasonography in asymptomatic women with non-fatty breast density.
Korpraphong P; Limsuwarn P; Tangcharoensathien W; Ansusingha T; Thephamongkhol K; Chuthapisith S
Acta Radiol; 2014 Oct; 55(8):903-8. PubMed ID: 24103915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radiologist-performed hand-held ultrasound screening at average risk of breast cancer: results from a single health screening center.
Chang JM; Koo HR; Moon WK
Acta Radiol; 2015 Jun; 56(6):652-8. PubMed ID: 24951614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Missed breast carcinoma; why and how to avoid?
Kamal RM; Abdel Razek NM; Hassan MA; Shaalan MA
J Egypt Natl Canc Inst; 2007 Sep; 19(3):178-94. PubMed ID: 19190691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
