204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18827103)
21. The substance view: a critique (part 2).
Lovering R
Bioethics; 2014 Sep; 28(7):378-86. PubMed ID: 22994595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Derivative deprivation and the wrong of abortion.
Stratton-Lake P
Bioethics; 2021 Mar; 35(3):277-283. PubMed ID: 33368424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Present self-represented futures of value are a reason for the wrongness of killing.
Parsons SJ
J Med Ethics; 2002 Jun; 28(3):196-7. PubMed ID: 12042409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Revisiting the argument from fetal potential.
Manninen BA
Philos Ethics Humanit Med; 2007 May; 2():7. PubMed ID: 17509146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Abortion and the Epicurean challenge.
Ekendahl K
J Med Ethics; 2020 Apr; 46(4):273-274. PubMed ID: 31630130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Deprivations, futures and the wrongness of killing.
Marquis D
J Med Ethics; 2001 Dec; 27(6):363-9. PubMed ID: 11731597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A Critique of Henrik Friberg-Fernros's Defense of the Substance View.
Simkulet W
Bioethics; 2016 Nov; 30(9):767-773. PubMed ID: 27687985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Future-like-ours as a metaphysical reductio ad absurdum argument of personal identity.
Chaffer TJ
Bioethics; 2023 May; 37(4):367-373. PubMed ID: 36773306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The intrinsic value of human life: a critique of Life's Dominion.
Lazarev N
E Law; 2005 Jul; 12(1-2):E7. PubMed ID: 16903026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The morality of abortion and the deprivation of futures.
Brown MT
J Med Ethics; 2000 Apr; 26(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 10786320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Meeting the Epicurean challenge: a reply to Christensen.
Blackshaw BP; Rodger D
J Med Ethics; 2019 Jul; 45(7):478-479. PubMed ID: 30772840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Ronald Dworkin on abortion and assisted suicide.
Kamm FM
J Ethics; 2001; 5(3):221-40. PubMed ID: 14686321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Killing fetuses and killing newborns.
Di Nucci E
J Med Ethics; 2013 May; 39(5):e19-20. PubMed ID: 23637456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The Two tragedies argument.
Simkulet W
J Med Ethics; 2019 May; 45(5):304-308. PubMed ID: 30796091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.
Peterfy A
J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Ensuring a stillborn: the ethics of fetal lethal injection in late abortion.
Callahan JC
J Clin Ethics; 1995; 6(3):254-63. PubMed ID: 8605389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The Substance View: A Critique (Part 3).
Lovering R
Bioethics; 2017 May; 31(4):305-312. PubMed ID: 28008642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The pro-life argument from substantial identity: a defence.
Lee P
Bioethics; 2004 Jun; 18(3):249-63. PubMed ID: 15341038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The pro-life argument from substantial identity and the pro-choice argument from asymmetric value: a reply to Patrick Lee.
Reiman J
Bioethics; 2007 Jul; 21(6):329-41. PubMed ID: 17845457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Moral knowledge: some reflections on moral controversies, incompatible moral epistemologies, and the culture wars.
Engelhardt HT
Christ Bioeth; 2004; 10(1):79-103. PubMed ID: 15675042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
