204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18827103)
41. Why abortion is immoral.
Marquis D
J Philos; 1989 Apr; 86(4):183-202. PubMed ID: 11782094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Critical notice--defending life: a moral and legal case against abortion choice by Francis J Beckwith.
Stretton D
J Med Ethics; 2008 Nov; 34(11):793-7. PubMed ID: 18974412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Three Problems with the Impairment Argument.
Simkulet W
Asian Bioeth Rev; 2023 Apr; 15(2):169-179. PubMed ID: 37035483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Abortion ethics.
Fromer MJ
Nurs Outlook; 1982 Apr; 30(4):234-40. PubMed ID: 7041095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Abortion and the golden rule.
Hare RM
Philos Public Aff; 1975; 4(3):201-22. PubMed ID: 11661183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Killing and Impairing Fetuses.
Singh P
New Bioeth; 2022 Jun; 28(2):127-138. PubMed ID: 35119344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Gerwirth's ethical rationalism and abortion: a response.
Jun N
Princet J Bioeth; 2000; 3(1):81-98. PubMed ID: 11936140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The impairment argument for the immorality of abortion: A reply.
Blackshaw BP
Bioethics; 2019 Jul; 33(6):723-724. PubMed ID: 30945321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Buddhism and the morality of abortion.
Barnhart MG
J Buddh Ethics; 1998; 5():276-97. PubMed ID: 16526121
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Abortion and self-defense.
Davis N
Philos Public Aff; 1984; 13(3):175-207. PubMed ID: 11655659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Parthenogenesis, identity, and value.
Simkulet W
Bioethics; 2024 Jun; 38(5):419-424. PubMed ID: 38652592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Strong's objections to the future of value account.
Marquis D
J Med Ethics; 2011 Jun; 37(6):384-8. PubMed ID: 21335573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Abortion: identity and loss.
Quinn W
Philos Public Aff; 1984; 13(1):24-54. PubMed ID: 11651752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Judaism and abortion: the hijacking of a tradition.
Nadler R
Hum Life Rev; 2006; 32(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 17111543
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. A dualist analysis of abortion: personhood and the concept of self qua experiential subject.
Himma KE
J Med Ethics; 2005 Jan; 31(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 15634753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. A Christian philosopher's view of recent directions in the abortion debate.
Lee P
Christ Bioeth; 2004; 10(1):7-31. PubMed ID: 15672530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Abortion and deprivation: a reply to Marquis.
Christensen A
J Med Ethics; 2019 Jan; 45(1):22-25. PubMed ID: 30429204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Does the Identity Objection to the future-like-ours argument succeed?
Blackshaw BP
Bioethics; 2020 Feb; 34(2):203-206. PubMed ID: 31769884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Foetuses, famous violinists, and the right to continued aid.
Davis M
Philos Q; 1983 Jul; 33(132):259-78. PubMed ID: 11651766
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Substance, rights, value, and abortion.
Simkulet W
Bioethics; 2019 Nov; 33(9):1002-1011. PubMed ID: 31318435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
