283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18827108)
1. Impact of recent legislative bills regarding clinical research on Italian ethics committee activity.
Porcu L; Poli D; Torri V; Rulli E; Di Tullio MC; Cinquini M; Bajetta E; Labianca R; Di Costanzo F; Nitti D; Floriani I
J Med Ethics; 2008 Oct; 34(10):747-50. PubMed ID: 18827108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Setting up of a Clinical Research Centers Ethics Committee in Rhône-Alpes-Auvergne district].
Chomel de Varagnes S; Duale C; Dubray C; Cracowski JL
Therapie; 2008; 63(4):321-5. PubMed ID: 18937911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Obtaining medical ethical approval for a multicentre, randomised study: prospective evaluation of a ponderous process].
van Santvoort HC; Besselink MG; Gooszen HG
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Sep; 152(38):2077-83. PubMed ID: 18837184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Local research ethics committees of the Mexican Institute of Social Security: results of a national survey.
Valdez-Martinez E; Garduño-Espinosa J; Martinez-Salgado H; Porter JD
Public Health; 2004 Jul; 118(5):329-36. PubMed ID: 15178139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The new system of review by multicentre research ethics committees: prospective study.
Tully J; Ninis N; Booy R; Viner R
BMJ; 2000 Apr; 320(7243):1179-82. PubMed ID: 10784541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Local research ethics committee approval for a national study in Scotland.
Ah-See KW; MacKenzie J; Thakker NS; Maran AG
J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1998 Oct; 43(5):303-5. PubMed ID: 9803097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multicentre trials review process by research ethics committees in Spain: where do they stand before implementing the new European regulation?
Dal-Ré R; Ortega R; Morejón E
J Med Ethics; 2005 Jun; 31(6):344-50. PubMed ID: 15923484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of the ethical review process for non-pharmacological multicentre studies in Germany on the basis of a randomised surgical trial.
Seiler CM; Kellmeyer P; Kienle P; Büchler MW; Knaebel HP;
J Med Ethics; 2007 Feb; 33(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 17264200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Health researchers' views of ethics committee functioning in New Zealand.
Paul C
N Z Med J; 2000 Jun; 113(1111):210-4. PubMed ID: 10909934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The annual reports of Local Research Ethics Committees.
Foster CG; Marshall T; Moodie P
J Med Ethics; 1995 Aug; 21(4):214-9. PubMed ID: 7473640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Review of policies for injuries to research participants in India.
Thatte UM; Kulkarni-Munshi R; Kalekar SA
J Med Ethics; 2009 Feb; 35(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 19181889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The conduct of clinical trials for medicinal products in europe in the light of the European clinical trials directive. Review of regulatory and practical aspects in the different countries.
Dubray C; Maillere P; Spriet A;
Therapie; 2007; 62(3):193-7, 199-202. PubMed ID: 17803885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ethical dilemmas of a large national multi-centre study in Australia: time for some consistency.
Driscoll A; Currey J; Worrall-Carter L; Stewart S
J Clin Nurs; 2008 Aug; 17(16):2212-20. PubMed ID: 18705740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Trust and confidence: towards mutual acceptance of ethics committee approval of multicentre studies.
Sarson-Lawrence M; Alt C; Mok MT; Dodds M; Rosenthal MA
Intern Med J; 2004 Nov; 34(11):598-603. PubMed ID: 15546452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Drug development: assessment of pharmacogenetic studies by Spanish research ethics committees.
Dal-Ré R; Luque I; Torres R; Lahuerta J
Pharmacogenomics J; 2009 Apr; 9(2):86-9. PubMed ID: 19079365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ethics committee reviews and mutual acceptance: a pilot study.
Rosenthal MA; Sarson-Lawrence M; Alt C; Arkell K; Dodds M;
Intern Med J; 2005 Nov; 35(11):650-4. PubMed ID: 16248858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Research Ethics Committees in Abruzzo: criticisms and prospects for developments].
Leuter C; Altobelli E; di Orio F
Ann Ig; 2010; 22(3):263-72. PubMed ID: 20677678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ethical review of a multicentre study in Scotland: a weighty problem.
al-Shahi R; Warlow CP
J R Coll Physicians Lond; 1999; 33(6):549-52. PubMed ID: 10633333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Communication deficiencies in research and monitoring by ethics committees.
Karunaratne AS; Myles PS; Ago MJ; Komesaroff PA
Intern Med J; 2006 Feb; 36(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 16472262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Navigating the maze of requirements for obtaining approval of non-interventional studies (NIS) in the European Union.
Ramirez I
Ger Med Sci; 2015; 13():Doc21. PubMed ID: 26633964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
