139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1882859)
1. Comment on "Implications of OSHA's reliance on TLVs in developing the air contaminants standard" by Robinson et al.
Saric M
Am J Ind Med; 1991; 19(6):815-7. PubMed ID: 1882859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Implications of OSHA's reliance on TLVs in developing the air contaminants standard.
Robinson JC; Paxman DG; Rappaport SM
Am J Ind Med; 1991; 19(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 1989435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Re: implications of OSHA's reliance on TLVs in developing the air contaminants standard.
Myers JE
Am J Ind Med; 1991; 19(6):832-4. PubMed ID: 1882864
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comments on "Implications of OSHA's reliance on TLVs in developing the air contaminants standard".
Cox GV
Am J Ind Med; 1991; 20(6):823-4. PubMed ID: 1805621
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. "Implications of OSHA's reliance on TLVs in developing the air contaminants standard": a comment.
Mendeloff J
Am J Ind Med; 1991; 19(5):681-3. PubMed ID: 2053584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Threshold limit values, permissible exposure limits, and feasibility: the bases for exposure limits in the United States.
Rappaport SM
Am J Ind Med; 1993 May; 23(5):683-94. PubMed ID: 8506846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Re: OSHA's reliance on TLVs.
Hagglund G
Am J Ind Med; 1991; 19(5):691. PubMed ID: 2053588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. OSHA's four inconsistent carcinogen policies.
Robinson JC; Paxman DG
Am J Public Health; 1991 Jun; 81(6):775-80. PubMed ID: 2029055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Technological, economic, and political feasibility in OSHA's Air Contaminants Standard.
Robinson JC; Paxman DG
J Health Polit Policy Law; 1991; 16(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 2066530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Re: "OSHA's reliance on TLVs".
Lauwerys R
Am J Ind Med; 1991; 19(6):827. PubMed ID: 1882861
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Good ideas sorely needed on OSHA's PELs.
Laws J
Occup Health Saf; 2015 May; 84(5):4. PubMed ID: 26043468
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The watchdog has no teeth, and may be blind: comments on OSHA's use of TLVs.
Frank AL
Am J Ind Med; 1991; 19(5):686-7. PubMed ID: 2053586
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. OSHA's final rule on asbestos cuts permissible exposure in half.
Okleshen W
Health Facil Manage; 1995 Jan; 8(1):38-40. PubMed ID: 10139314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. OSHA's respiratory protection standard.
Occup Health Saf; 1993 Sep; 62(9):64. PubMed ID: 8414373
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Updating OSHA's permissible exposure limits: putting politics aside.
Paustenbach DJ
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1997 Dec; 58(12):845-9. PubMed ID: 9425644
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A response to OMB's comments regarding OSHA's approach to risk assessment in support of OSHA's final rule on cadmium.
Crump KS; Gentry R
Risk Anal; 1993 Oct; 13(5):487-9. PubMed ID: 8259438
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. OSHA compliance issues. Styrene overexposure in a bathtub manufacturing facility.
Swearngin S
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2005 Nov; 2(11):D82-6. PubMed ID: 16276634
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The history of OSHA's asbestos rule makings and some distinctive approaches that they introduced for regulating occupational exposure to toxic substances.
Martonik JF; Nash E; Grossman E
AIHAJ; 2001; 62(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 11331993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Regulation of occupational carcinogens under OSHA's Air Contaminants Standard.
Paxman DG; Robinson JC
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1990 Dec; 12(3 Pt 1):296-308. PubMed ID: 2077564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Generic strategies for protecting worker health and safety. OSHA's general duty clause and hazard communications standard.
Baram M
Occup Med; 1996; 11(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 8907052
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
