These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

2203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18829091)

  • 1. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
    Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy?
    Seamon LG; Cohn DE; Henretta MS; Kim KH; Carlson MJ; Phillips GS; Fowler JM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19168206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robotically assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer.
    DeNardis SA; Holloway RW; Bigsby GE; Pikaart DP; Ahmad S; Finkler NJ
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):412-7. PubMed ID: 18834620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surgical management of early-stage endometrial cancer in the elderly: is laparoscopy feasible?
    Scribner DR; Walker JL; Johnson GA; McMeekin SD; Gold MA; Mannel RS
    Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Dec; 83(3):563-8. PubMed ID: 11733973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparative study of 3 surgical methods for hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer: robotic assistance, laparoscopy, laparotomy.
    Boggess JF; Gehrig PA; Cantrell L; Shafer A; Ridgway M; Skinner EN; Fowler WC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 199(4):360.e1-9. PubMed ID: 18928974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy.
    Estape R; Lambrou N; Diaz R; Estape E; Dunkin N; Rivera A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Jun; 113(3):357-61. PubMed ID: 19345987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for the surgical staging of endometrial carcinoma.
    Wong CK; Wong YH; Lo LS; Tai CM; Ng TK
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2005 Aug; 31(4):286-90. PubMed ID: 16018773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical outcome and complications of laparoscopic surgery compared with traditional surgery in women with endometrial cancer.
    Kuoppala T; Tomás E; Heinonen PK
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2004 Jul; 270(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 12728326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost analysis of laparoscopy versus laparotomy for early endometrial cancer.
    Scribner DR; Mannel RS; Walker JL; Johnson GA
    Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Dec; 75(3):460-3. PubMed ID: 10600307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
    Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer: Analysis of surgical performance.
    Holloway RW; Ahmad S; DeNardis SA; Peterson LB; Sultana N; Bigsby GE; Pikaart DP; Finkler NJ
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Dec; 115(3):447-52. PubMed ID: 19765807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hysterectomy for obese women with endometrial cancer: laparoscopy or laparotomy?
    Eltabbakh GH; Shamonki MI; Moody JM; Garafano LL
    Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Sep; 78(3 Pt 1):329-35. PubMed ID: 10985889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Endometrial cancer surgery costs: robot vs laparoscopy.
    Holtz DO; Miroshnichenko G; Finnegan MO; Chernick M; Dunton CJ
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(4):500-3. PubMed ID: 20547112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robot-assisted staging using three robotic arms for endometrial cancer: comparison to laparoscopy and laparotomy at a single institution.
    Jung YW; Lee DW; Kim SW; Nam EJ; Kim JH; Kim JW; Kim YT
    J Surg Oncol; 2010 Feb; 101(2):116-21. PubMed ID: 19902479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
    Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A detailed analysis of the learning curve: robotic hysterectomy and pelvic-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer.
    Seamon LG; Fowler JM; Richardson DL; Carlson MJ; Valmadre S; Phillips GS; Cohn DE
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Aug; 114(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 19428096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is laparoscopic or abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy more efficient in operative treatment of endometrial cancer?
    Barwijuk A; Jankowska S
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Oct; 25(7):703-5. PubMed ID: 16263547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.
    Payne TN; Dauterive FR
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18439499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laparoscopic pelvic and paraaortic lymph node dissection: analysis of the first 100 cases.
    Scribner DR; Walker JL; Johnson GA; McMeekin SD; Gold MA; Mannel RS
    Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Sep; 82(3):498-503. PubMed ID: 11520146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of perioperative outcomes and cost of robotic-assisted laparoscopy, laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer.
    Coronado PJ; Herraiz MA; Magrina JF; Fasero M; Vidart JA
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Dec; 165(2):289-94. PubMed ID: 22819573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 111.