These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18829091)
21. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: program initiation and outcomes after the first year with comparison with laparotomy for endometrial cancer staging. Veljovich DS; Paley PJ; Drescher CW; Everett EN; Shah C; Peters WA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 198(6):679.e1-9; discussion 679.e9-10. PubMed ID: 18538151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Short- and long-term morbidity and outcomes after robotic surgery for comprehensive endometrial cancer staging. Backes FJ; Brudie LA; Farrell MR; Ahmad S; Finkler NJ; Bigsby GE; O'Malley D; Cohn DE; Holloway RW; Fowler JM Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Jun; 125(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 22387522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A prospective, comparative study on robotic versus open-surgery hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma. Eklind S; Lindfors A; Sjöli P; Dahm-Kähler P Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Feb; 25(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 25611898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study. Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Clinical analysis of radical hysterectomy plus pelvic lymphadenectomy for patients with malignant uterine tumors: laparoscopy versus laparotomy]. He YL; Zhang LY; Yang J; Pan SL; Peng DX Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2004 May; 39(5):308-10. PubMed ID: 15196411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. What is the optimal minimally invasive surgical procedure for endometrial cancer staging in the obese and morbidly obese woman? Gehrig PA; Cantrell LA; Shafer A; Abaid LN; Mendivil A; Boggess JF Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Oct; 111(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 18694588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in stages I and II endometrial cancer. Operating data, follow up and survival. Zapico A; Fuentes P; Grassa A; Arnanz F; Otazua J; Cortés-Prieto J Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Aug; 98(2):222-7. PubMed ID: 15982724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A cohort study evaluating robotic versus laparotomy surgical outcomes of obese women with endometrial carcinoma. Subramaniam A; Kim KH; Bryant SA; Zhang B; Sikes C; Kimball KJ; Kilgore LC; Huh WK; Straughn JM; Alvarez RD Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Sep; 122(3):604-7. PubMed ID: 21658752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Robotic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical carcinoma: a pilot study. Kim YT; Kim SW; Hyung WJ; Lee SJ; Nam EJ; Lee WJ Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Feb; 108(2):312-6. PubMed ID: 18035405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with pelvic/aortic lymph node dissection for endometrial cancer--a consecutive series without case selection and comparison to laparotomy. Eisenkop SM Gynecol Oncol; 2010 May; 117(2):216-23. PubMed ID: 20138346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy for early-stage endometrial cancer: a prospective randomized study. Malzoni M; Tinelli R; Cosentino F; Perone C; Rasile M; Iuzzolino D; Malzoni C; Reich H Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Jan; 112(1):126-33. PubMed ID: 18947861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Laparoscopic pelvic and paraaortic lymph node dissection in the obese. Scribner DR; Walker JL; Johnson GA; McMeekin DS; Gold MA; Mannel RS Gynecol Oncol; 2002 Mar; 84(3):426-30. PubMed ID: 11855882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Feasibility and morbidity of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with or without pelvic limphadenectomy in obese women with stage I endometrial cancer. Pellegrino A; Signorelli M; Fruscio R; Villa A; Buda A; Beretta P; Garbi A; Vitobello D Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 May; 279(5):655-60. PubMed ID: 18795308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Perioperative outcomes of total laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy versus total robotic hysterectomy in endometrial cancer patients: a multicentre study. Fagotti A; Gagliardi ML; Fanfani F; Salerno MG; Ercoli A; D'Asta M; Tortorella L; Turco LC; Escobar P; Scambia G Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Jun; 125(3):552-5. PubMed ID: 22391483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Laparoscopic para-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy: experience with 150 patients and review of the literature. Possover M; Krause N; Plaul K; Kühne-Heid R; Schneider A Gynecol Oncol; 1998 Oct; 71(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 9784314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Overall care cost comparison between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for endometrial and cervical cancer. Desille-Gbaguidi H; Hebert T; Paternotte-Villemagne J; Gaborit C; Rush E; Body G Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Dec; 171(2):348-52. PubMed ID: 24135382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparing surgical outcomes in obese women undergoing laparotomy, laparoscopy, or laparotomy with panniculectomy for the staging of uterine malignancy. Eisenhauer EL; Wypych KA; Mehrara BJ; Lawson C; Chi DS; Barakat RR; Abu-Rustum NR Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Aug; 14(8):2384-91. PubMed ID: 17522943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A comparison of laparascopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer. Steed H; Rosen B; Murphy J; Laframboise S; De Petrillo D; Covens A Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Jun; 93(3):588-93. PubMed ID: 15196849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]