These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18829091)
41. Standardized technique of laparoscopic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic cancer optimizes the perioperative outcomes. Kavallaris A; Kalogiannidis I; Chalvatzas N; Hornemann A; Bohlmann MK; Diedrich K Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Jun; 283(6):1373-80. PubMed ID: 20607263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in gynecologic oncology: technique and initial report. Fader AN; Escobar PF Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Aug; 114(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 19481243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. A cost analysis of postoperative management in endometrial cancer patients treated by robotics versus laparoscopic approach. Martino MA; Shubella J; Thomas MB; Morcrette RM; Schindler J; Williams S; Boulay R Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Dec; 123(3):528-31. PubMed ID: 21968341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. A comparative detail analysis of the learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy versus laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in treatment of endometrial cancer: a case-matched controlled study of the first one hundred twenty two patients. Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Mar; 120(3):413-8. PubMed ID: 21194735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. [Study of surplus cost of robotic assistance for radical hysterectomy, versus laparotomy and standard laparoscopy]. Dennis T; de Mendonça C; Phalippou J; Collinet P; Boulanger L; Weingertner F; Leblanc E; Narducci F Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2012 Feb; 40(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 22252053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Analysis of survival after laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with the conventional abdominal approach for early-stage endometrial carcinoma: a review of the literature. Gil-Moreno A; Díaz-Feijoo B; Morchón S; Xercavins J J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 16431320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. [Robot assisted endometrial cancer staging - evaluation the first 100 operations and comparing the first andthe last 30 operations]. Marek R; Dzvinčuk P; Kudela M; Hambálek P; Maděrka M; Zapletalová J; Pilka R Ceska Gynekol; 2015 Oct; 80(5):324-32. PubMed ID: 26606116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Robotic-assisted surgery in the management of endometrial cancer. Holloway RW; Ahmad S J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2012 Jan; 38(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 22136216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. New technologies for reproductive medicine: laparoscopy, endoscopy, robotic surgery and gynecology. A review of the literature. Cho JE; Shamshirsaz AH; Nezhat C; Nezhat C; Nezhat F Minerva Ginecol; 2010 Apr; 62(2):137-67. PubMed ID: 20502426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy using pulsed bipolar system: comparison with conventional bipolar electrosurgery. Lee CL; Huang KG; Wang CJ; Lee PS; Hwang LL Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Jun; 105(3):620-4. PubMed ID: 17303226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and immediate costs. Advincula AP; Xu X; Goudeau S; Ransom SB J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(6):698-705. PubMed ID: 17980329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Comparison of single-port laparoscopy, standard laparoscopy, and robotic surgery in patients with endometrial cancer. Escobar PF; Frumovitz M; Soliman PT; Frasure HE; Fader AN; Schmeler KM; Ramirez PT Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 May; 19(5):1583-8. PubMed ID: 22083622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with abdominal hysterectomy in clinical stage I endometrial cancer: safety, recurrence, and long-term outcome. Kalogiannidis I; Lambrechts S; Amant F; Neven P; Van Gorp T; Vergote I Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Mar; 196(3):248.e1-8. PubMed ID: 17346541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. Ramirez PT; Slomovitz BM; Soliman PT; Coleman RL; Levenback C Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Aug; 102(2):252-5. PubMed ID: 16472844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [Laparoscopic para-aortic and pelvic lymph node excision--initial experiences and development of a technique]. Schneider A; Krause N; Kühne-Heid R; Kamprath S; Endisch U; Merker A; Nöschel H Zentralbl Gynakol; 1996; 118(9):498-504. PubMed ID: 8992817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy for surgical staging of endometrial cancer: morbidity and mortality. Larson DM; Johnson K; Olson KA Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Jun; 79(6):998-1001. PubMed ID: 1579330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Totally laparoscopic radical BII gastrectomy for the treatment of gastric cancer: a comparison with open surgery. Lee WJ; Wang W; Chen TC; Chen JC; Ser KH Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2008 Aug; 18(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 18716536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison of outcomes and cost. Halliday D; Lau S; Vaknin Z; Deland C; Levental M; McNamara E; Gotlieb R; Kaufer R; How J; Cohen E; Gotlieb WH J Robot Surg; 2010 Dec; 4(4):211-6. PubMed ID: 27627947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Robotic versus open radical hysterectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. Ko EM; Muto MG; Berkowitz RS; Feltmate CM Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):425-30. PubMed ID: 18929400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Effect of surgeon's experience on the surgical outcome of laparoscopic surgery for women with endometrial cancer. Eltabbakh GH Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Jul; 78(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 10873411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]