237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18829097)
1. Approach for valuating the influence of laboratory simulation.
Rosentritt M; Behr M; van der Zel JM; Feilzer AJ
Dent Mater; 2009 Mar; 25(3):348-52. PubMed ID: 18829097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fracture resistance of zirconia FPDs with adhesive bonding versus conventional cementation.
Rosentritt M; Hmaidouch R; Behr M; Handel G; Schneider-Feyrer S
Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(2):168-71. PubMed ID: 21479286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of preliminary damage on the load-bearing capacity of zirconia fixed dental prostheses.
Kohorst P; Butzheinen LO; Dittmer MP; Heuer W; Borchers L; Stiesch M
J Prosthodont; 2010 Dec; 19(8):606-13. PubMed ID: 20723012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fracture resistance of all-ceramic zirconia bridges with differing phase stabilizers and quality of sintering.
Sundh A; Sjögren G
Dent Mater; 2006 Aug; 22(8):778-84. PubMed ID: 16414111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fractographic analyses of zirconia-based fixed partial dentures.
Taskonak B; Yan J; Mecholsky JJ; Sertgöz A; Koçak A
Dent Mater; 2008 Aug; 24(8):1077-82. PubMed ID: 18282595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fracture resistance of lithium disilicate-, alumina-, and zirconia-based three-unit fixed partial dentures: a laboratory study.
Tinschert J; Natt G; Mautsch W; Augthun M; Spiekermann H
Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(3):231-8. PubMed ID: 11484570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fracture force of tooth-tooth- and implant-tooth-supported all-ceramic fixed partial dentures using titanium vs. customised zirconia implant abutments.
Kolbeck C; Behr M; Rosentritt M; Handel G
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1049-53. PubMed ID: 18707604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fatigue resistance and failure mode of CAD/CAM composite resin implant abutments restored with type III composite resin and porcelain veneers.
Magne P; Oderich E; Boff LL; Cardoso AC; Belser UC
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Nov; 22(11):1275-81. PubMed ID: 21985284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. All-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Studies on aluminum oxide- and zirconium dioxide-based ceramic systems.
Vult von Steyern P
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2005; (173):1-69. PubMed ID: 16001730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fracture strength of zirconia implants after artificial aging.
Andreiotelli M; Kohal RJ
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Jun; 11(2):158-66. PubMed ID: 18657150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stability of prototype two-piece zirconia and titanium implants after artificial aging: an in vitro pilot study.
Kohal RJ; Finke HC; Klaus G
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):323-9. PubMed ID: 18783418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fracture behaviour of zirconia ceramic cantilever fixed dental prostheses in vitro.
Gabbert O; Ohlmann B; Schmitter M; Gilde H; Ruef T; Rammelsberg P
Acta Odontol Scand; 2008 Aug; 66(4):200-6. PubMed ID: 18622828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The fracture load and failure types of veneered anterior zirconia crowns: an analysis of normal and Weibull distribution of complete and censored data.
Stawarczyk B; Ozcan M; Hämmerle CH; Roos M
Dent Mater; 2012 May; 28(5):478-87. PubMed ID: 22196897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mechanical and fracture behavior of veneer-framework composites for all-ceramic dental bridges.
Studart AR; Filser F; Kocher P; Lüthy H; Gauckler LJ
Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):115-23. PubMed ID: 16473403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fracture strength of prefabricated all-ceramic posterior inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses.
Mehl C; Ludwig K; Steiner M; Kern M
Dent Mater; 2010 Jan; 26(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 19836829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of thermal properties of veneering ceramics on the fracture load of layered Ce-TZP/A nanocomposite frameworks.
Fischer J; Stawarczyk B; Trottmann A; Hämmerle CH
Dent Mater; 2009 Mar; 25(3):326-30. PubMed ID: 18804856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bridging the gap between clinical failure and laboratory fracture strength tests using a fractographic approach.
Aboushelib MN; Feilzer AJ; Kleverlaan CJ
Dent Mater; 2009 Mar; 25(3):383-91. PubMed ID: 18926566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Five-year follow-up of implant-supported Y-TZP and ZTA fixed dental prostheses. A randomized, prospective clinical trial comparing two different material systems.
Larsson C; Vult von Steyern P
Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(6):555-61. PubMed ID: 21209993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Surface characteristics of zirconia-based posterior restorations: clinical and scanning electron microscopic analysis.
Schmitt J; Wichmann M; Karl M; Göllner M; Lohbauer U; Holst S
J Can Dent Assoc; 2011; 77():b31. PubMed ID: 21507284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of substructure design and spacer settings on the in vitro performance of molar zirconia crowns.
Rosentritt M; Steiger D; Behr M; Handel G; Kolbeck C
J Dent; 2009 Dec; 37(12):978-83. PubMed ID: 19695301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
